What Phenomenology Can Bring to Theatre Sociology, and What It Cannot, with Reference to Radio Muezzin in Aarhus

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
J. Edelman
{"title":"What Phenomenology Can Bring to Theatre Sociology, and What It Cannot, with Reference to Radio Muezzin in Aarhus","authors":"J. Edelman","doi":"10.7146/nts.v24i1.114827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"What contribution can phenomenology make to contemporary theatre and performance studies? What sort of critical tasks is it better suited for than other available modes of analysis? In this article, I will address these questions from the perspective of the study of theatre as a social practice in the sense proposed by Pierre Bourdieu: that is, as a set of set-apart, taught and embodied patterns of social striving, which pursue their own values and are constantly subject to redefinition by their participants.1 It may seem at first that phenomenology has little in common with this sort of sociological view of the theatrical field. This is only partially correct. The two are distinct but complementary; neither alone can provide as complete a portrait of what theatre does than the two can together. My argument here is twofold: first, phenomenological methods are limited and cannot in themselves describe the functions that theatre serves for audiences or society; second, the social analysis that can aid in this task still has a particular need for phenomenological methods, particularly if it wishes to avoid the Scylla of rigid determinism and the Charybdis of social psychoanalysis. I will make this argument through an encounter between Bourdieu’s work and a few key contemporary examples of theatre phenomenology (principally, Bert States and Erica Fischer-Lichte). I will then demonstrate the applicability of this argument through an analysis of a specific moment from a performance of Rimini Protokoll’s Radio Muezzin in Aarhus. In so doing, I hope to contribute to a better understanding of how artistic fields such as theatre might be amenable to sociological analysis. I believe that such an approach can offer a more flexible, full and vibrant insight into the function that theatrical events serve for those who make and attend them. But the details of this approach remain only sketchily articulated in the existing literature. Detailing how a sociological method would relate to so central an approach as phenomenology would be a useful contribution to the filling in of that sketch.","PeriodicalId":53807,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Theatre Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Theatre Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/nts.v24i1.114827","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

What contribution can phenomenology make to contemporary theatre and performance studies? What sort of critical tasks is it better suited for than other available modes of analysis? In this article, I will address these questions from the perspective of the study of theatre as a social practice in the sense proposed by Pierre Bourdieu: that is, as a set of set-apart, taught and embodied patterns of social striving, which pursue their own values and are constantly subject to redefinition by their participants.1 It may seem at first that phenomenology has little in common with this sort of sociological view of the theatrical field. This is only partially correct. The two are distinct but complementary; neither alone can provide as complete a portrait of what theatre does than the two can together. My argument here is twofold: first, phenomenological methods are limited and cannot in themselves describe the functions that theatre serves for audiences or society; second, the social analysis that can aid in this task still has a particular need for phenomenological methods, particularly if it wishes to avoid the Scylla of rigid determinism and the Charybdis of social psychoanalysis. I will make this argument through an encounter between Bourdieu’s work and a few key contemporary examples of theatre phenomenology (principally, Bert States and Erica Fischer-Lichte). I will then demonstrate the applicability of this argument through an analysis of a specific moment from a performance of Rimini Protokoll’s Radio Muezzin in Aarhus. In so doing, I hope to contribute to a better understanding of how artistic fields such as theatre might be amenable to sociological analysis. I believe that such an approach can offer a more flexible, full and vibrant insight into the function that theatrical events serve for those who make and attend them. But the details of this approach remain only sketchily articulated in the existing literature. Detailing how a sociological method would relate to so central an approach as phenomenology would be a useful contribution to the filling in of that sketch.
现象学能给戏剧社会学带来什么,又不能带来什么——以奥胡斯广播电台为例
现象学对当代戏剧和表演研究有何贡献?它比其他可用的分析模式更适合哪些关键任务?在本文中,我将从皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)提出的意义上的戏剧作为一种社会实践的研究角度来解决这些问题:即,作为一套被设定、教导和体现的社会奋斗模式,它们追求自己的价值观,并不断受到参与者的重新定义乍一看,现象学似乎与这种戏剧领域的社会学观点没有什么共同之处。这只是部分正确。两者截然不同,但互为补充;两者加在一起,都不能完整地描述戏剧的作用。我的观点是双重的:首先,现象学方法是有限的,不能描述戏剧为观众或社会服务的功能;第二,能够帮助完成这项任务的社会分析仍然特别需要现象学方法,特别是如果它希望避免严格决定论的Scylla和社会精神分析的Charybdis。我将通过布迪厄的作品与当代戏剧现象学的几个关键例子(主要是伯特·States和艾丽卡·费舍尔-利希特)之间的相遇来提出这个论点。然后,我将通过分析Rimini Protokoll的Radio Muezzin在奥胡斯演出的一个特定时刻来证明这一论点的适用性。通过这样做,我希望有助于更好地理解戏剧等艺术领域如何适用于社会学分析。我相信,这种方法可以为戏剧活动的制作者和参与者提供更灵活、更全面、更有活力的视角。但是这种方法的细节在现有文献中只是粗略地阐述了一下。详细说明社会学方法如何与现象学这样的核心方法相联系,将对填补这一草图作出有益的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信