Effects of Mean Stress and Multiaxial Loading on the Fatigue Life of Springs

V. Kobelev
{"title":"Effects of Mean Stress and Multiaxial Loading on the Fatigue Life of Springs","authors":"V. Kobelev","doi":"10.3390/eng4020095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, the effects of mean stress and damage accumulation on the fatigue life of springs are theoretically studied. The study examines the fatigue life of homogeneously stressed material subjected to cyclic loading. The mean stress of a load cycle is non-zero. Goodman and Haigh diagrams are commonly used for estimating fatigue life in engineering applications. Alternatively, conventional hypotheses by Smith–Watson–Topper, Walker and Bergmann have been successfully used to describe uniaxial cyclic fatigue with non-zero mean value over the whole range of the fatigue life. However, the physical characteristics of the mean stress sensitivities in these hypotheses are different. The mean stress sensitivity according to Smith–Watson–Topper is identical for all materials and stress levels. This weakness reduces the applicability of the Smith–Watson–Topper parameter. At first glance, the mean stress sensitivities according to Walker and Bergmann are diverse. The mean stress sensitivities depend upon two different additional correction parameters, namely the Bergmann parameter and the Walker exponent. The possibility of fitting the mean stress sensitivity in these hypotheses overcomes the significant drawback of the Smith–Watson–Topper schema. The principal task of this actual study is to reveal the dependence between the Bergmann parameter and the Walker exponent, which leads to a certain mean stress sensitivity. The manuscript establishes the simple relationship between both fitting parameters, which causes the equivalent mean stress sensitivity for the Bergmann and Walker criteria. As known from the state of the technology, fabrication and operation yield several impacts with a significant influence on the fatigue life of springs. One effect deals with the sequence of low and high stress amplitudes and amplitude-dependent damage accumulation. Particularly, during the load cycle a certain microscopical creep occurs. This creep causes damage. The accumulation hypothesis for creep damage is introduced. The hypothesis can be verified experimentally.","PeriodicalId":10630,"journal":{"name":"Comput. Chem. Eng.","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comput. Chem. Eng.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/eng4020095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the effects of mean stress and damage accumulation on the fatigue life of springs are theoretically studied. The study examines the fatigue life of homogeneously stressed material subjected to cyclic loading. The mean stress of a load cycle is non-zero. Goodman and Haigh diagrams are commonly used for estimating fatigue life in engineering applications. Alternatively, conventional hypotheses by Smith–Watson–Topper, Walker and Bergmann have been successfully used to describe uniaxial cyclic fatigue with non-zero mean value over the whole range of the fatigue life. However, the physical characteristics of the mean stress sensitivities in these hypotheses are different. The mean stress sensitivity according to Smith–Watson–Topper is identical for all materials and stress levels. This weakness reduces the applicability of the Smith–Watson–Topper parameter. At first glance, the mean stress sensitivities according to Walker and Bergmann are diverse. The mean stress sensitivities depend upon two different additional correction parameters, namely the Bergmann parameter and the Walker exponent. The possibility of fitting the mean stress sensitivity in these hypotheses overcomes the significant drawback of the Smith–Watson–Topper schema. The principal task of this actual study is to reveal the dependence between the Bergmann parameter and the Walker exponent, which leads to a certain mean stress sensitivity. The manuscript establishes the simple relationship between both fitting parameters, which causes the equivalent mean stress sensitivity for the Bergmann and Walker criteria. As known from the state of the technology, fabrication and operation yield several impacts with a significant influence on the fatigue life of springs. One effect deals with the sequence of low and high stress amplitudes and amplitude-dependent damage accumulation. Particularly, during the load cycle a certain microscopical creep occurs. This creep causes damage. The accumulation hypothesis for creep damage is introduced. The hypothesis can be verified experimentally.
平均应力和多轴载荷对弹簧疲劳寿命的影响
本文从理论上研究了平均应力和损伤累积对弹簧疲劳寿命的影响。研究了均匀应力材料在循环载荷作用下的疲劳寿命。一个荷载周期的平均应力不为零。古德曼图和黑格图在工程应用中常用来估计疲劳寿命。另外,Smith-Watson-Topper、Walker和Bergmann的传统假设已经成功地用于描述在整个疲劳寿命范围内具有非零平均值的单轴循环疲劳。然而,这些假设的平均应力敏感性的物理特征是不同的。根据史密斯-沃森-托普的平均应力敏感性对所有材料和应力水平都是相同的。这个缺点降低了Smith-Watson-Topper参数的适用性。乍一看,根据Walker和Bergmann的平均应力敏感性是多种多样的。平均应力敏感性取决于两个不同的附加校正参数,即Bergmann参数和Walker指数。在这些假设中拟合平均应力敏感性的可能性克服了Smith-Watson-Topper模式的显著缺陷。实际研究的主要任务是揭示Bergmann参数与Walker指数之间的依赖关系,这导致了一定的平均应力敏感性。本文建立了两个拟合参数之间的简单关系,这使得Bergmann和Walker准则的平均应力灵敏度相等。从目前的技术状况来看,弹簧的制造和使用会产生一些影响,这些影响对弹簧的疲劳寿命有很大的影响。一种效应处理了低应力幅值和高应力幅值的序列以及与幅值相关的损伤积累。特别是在荷载循环过程中,会发生一定的微观蠕变。这种蠕变会造成伤害。介绍了蠕变损伤的累积假设。这个假设可以通过实验加以验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信