The Inadequacy of “Choice”

Alison Piepmeier, George Estreich, R. Adams
{"title":"The Inadequacy of “Choice”","authors":"Alison Piepmeier, George Estreich, R. Adams","doi":"10.18574/nyu/9781479816637.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter examines the limitations of feminist discussions about disability and reproduction. Feminism and disability rights often hold different places in reproductive justice discussions. Feminism often oversimplifies the idea of reproductive choice, focusing on individual women and endorsing cultural stereotypes of disability. As a counterpoint to the scholarly literature of these issues, Alison Piepmeier interviewed twenty-nine parents of children with Down syndrome, asking them about their pregnancy, prenatal testing, and their families. The responses of these parents illustrate how families need more support than just individual rights to raise a child with a disability. Although reproductive decisions may rest on an individual woman, she must also consider community support and health services in her decision to raise a child, particularly one with a disability.","PeriodicalId":23169,"journal":{"name":"TP100. TP100 UNEXPECTED COVID-19 CASE REPORTS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP100. TP100 UNEXPECTED COVID-19 CASE REPORTS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479816637.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter examines the limitations of feminist discussions about disability and reproduction. Feminism and disability rights often hold different places in reproductive justice discussions. Feminism often oversimplifies the idea of reproductive choice, focusing on individual women and endorsing cultural stereotypes of disability. As a counterpoint to the scholarly literature of these issues, Alison Piepmeier interviewed twenty-nine parents of children with Down syndrome, asking them about their pregnancy, prenatal testing, and their families. The responses of these parents illustrate how families need more support than just individual rights to raise a child with a disability. Although reproductive decisions may rest on an individual woman, she must also consider community support and health services in her decision to raise a child, particularly one with a disability.
“选择”的不足
本章考察了女性主义关于残疾和生殖的讨论的局限性。女权主义和残疾人权利在生殖正义的讨论中往往占据不同的位置。女权主义往往过分简化了生育选择的概念,把重点放在女性个人身上,支持对残疾的文化刻板印象。作为对这些问题的学术文献的对照,Alison Piepmeier采访了29位唐氏综合症儿童的父母,询问他们的怀孕、产前检查和家庭情况。这些父母的回应说明,抚养残疾儿童,家庭需要的不仅仅是个人权利,还有更多的支持。虽然生育决定可能取决于妇女个人,但她在决定抚养孩子,特别是残疾孩子时,也必须考虑到社区的支持和保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信