Infant Swimming Increase the Risk of Atopy and Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

S. Hamdani, Yue Zhou, Shaista Shireen, Qinglong Li
{"title":"Infant Swimming Increase the Risk of Atopy and Respiratory Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"S. Hamdani, Yue Zhou, Shaista Shireen, Qinglong Li","doi":"10.26710/jbsee.v8i1.2216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The benefits of infant swimming must be considered against the risk of adverse occurrences during infant swimming practice. Several research studies have recommended against newborn swimming since there is little data to support its use in preventing drowning in infants.  \nMethodology / Evidence Acquisitionː In the context of the PRISMA guidelines, the researcher did a systematic review and meta-analysis research on infant swimming. From 1950 to 2021, an online database search was conducted using keywords and MeSH terms such as \"infant swimming\", \"safety\", \"infant swimming lessons\", and \"infant diving\" on healthcare search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, BioMed Central, Cochrane Library, ERIC, PILOTS, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, and Med SC. The researcher excluded articles that were first published in a foreign language and did not have an English translation. \nFindings / Evidence Synthesisː The risk of respiratory tract infection is greater in the control group, 95% confidence interval is 1.95 [1.24, 1.97] (p = 0.000). The difference in risk of atopy is between infant swimmers and the control group is significant, and the risk is greater in the control group compared to swimming infants; 95% confidence interval is 1.36 [1.01, 1.84] (p = 0.000). \nConclusions/ Originality Value: Swimming does not raise the risk of infection in infants, nor does it predispose them to asthma. We propose further more research into the benefits of infant swimming in reducing the burden of childhood drowning, which is the leading cause of death in this age group.                                ","PeriodicalId":53047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business and Social Review in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26710/jbsee.v8i1.2216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The benefits of infant swimming must be considered against the risk of adverse occurrences during infant swimming practice. Several research studies have recommended against newborn swimming since there is little data to support its use in preventing drowning in infants.  Methodology / Evidence Acquisitionː In the context of the PRISMA guidelines, the researcher did a systematic review and meta-analysis research on infant swimming. From 1950 to 2021, an online database search was conducted using keywords and MeSH terms such as "infant swimming", "safety", "infant swimming lessons", and "infant diving" on healthcare search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, BioMed Central, Cochrane Library, ERIC, PILOTS, PsycARTICLES, MEDLINE, AMED, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, and Med SC. The researcher excluded articles that were first published in a foreign language and did not have an English translation. Findings / Evidence Synthesisː The risk of respiratory tract infection is greater in the control group, 95% confidence interval is 1.95 [1.24, 1.97] (p = 0.000). The difference in risk of atopy is between infant swimmers and the control group is significant, and the risk is greater in the control group compared to swimming infants; 95% confidence interval is 1.36 [1.01, 1.84] (p = 0.000). Conclusions/ Originality Value: Swimming does not raise the risk of infection in infants, nor does it predispose them to asthma. We propose further more research into the benefits of infant swimming in reducing the burden of childhood drowning, which is the leading cause of death in this age group.                                
婴儿游泳增加特应性和呼吸道感染的风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:在婴儿游泳练习中,必须考虑到婴儿游泳的好处和不良事件的风险。一些研究建议反对新生儿游泳,因为几乎没有数据支持它在防止婴儿溺水中的使用。方法/证据获取/在PRISMA指南的背景下,研究者对婴儿游泳进行了系统综述和荟萃分析研究。从1950年到2021年,在PubMed、Google Scholar、BioMed Central、Cochrane Library、ERIC、PILOTS、PsycARTICLES、MEDLINE、AMED、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science、Science Direct、Taylor & Francis等医疗搜索引擎上使用“婴儿游泳”、“安全”、“婴儿游泳课程”和“婴儿潜水”等关键词和MeSH术语进行了在线数据库搜索。该研究人员排除了首次以外语发表且没有英文翻译的文章。结果/证据综合:对照组呼吸道感染风险更大,95%可信区间为1.95 [1.24,1.97](p = 0.000)。游泳婴儿与对照组的特应性风险差异显著,对照组的特应性风险高于游泳婴儿;95%置信区间为1.36 [1.01,1.84](p = 0.000)。结论/独创性价值:游泳不会增加婴儿感染的风险,也不会使婴儿易患哮喘。我们建议进一步研究婴儿游泳在减少儿童溺水负担方面的益处,这是这一年龄组死亡的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信