Embodied Energy and Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: A Review in Residential Buildings

P. Chastas, T. Theodosiou, D. Bikas, K. Kontoleon
{"title":"Embodied Energy and Nearly Zero Energy Buildings: A Review in Residential Buildings","authors":"P. Chastas,&nbsp;T. Theodosiou,&nbsp;D. Bikas,&nbsp;K. Kontoleon","doi":"10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Towards the EPBD recast 2010/31/EU and the nearly zero energy building (nZEB), this review addresses the whole life cycle energy analysis of residential buildings. Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) of 90 case studies of residential buildings is evaluated with a specific focus on the normalization procedure that follows the principles of Product Category Rule (PCR) 2014:02 for buildings. The normalization procedure provided a minimization of the sample by considering issues of comparability, the omissions in the boundaries of the system, the LCI method and the updating on the energy efficiency definition of the building. Results indicate that the use of different LCI methods leads to an important fluctuation in the absolute values of embodied energy as the embodied energy of annZEB calculated with process analysis is lower than every case study calculated with hybrid input-output analysis without including nZEBs. The share of embodied energy in low energy buildings could reach up to 57% -or even up to 83% when renewable energy sources are used for electricity production- and in nZEBs up to 100% even though a significant reduction in the total life cycle energy is identified. The increase in embodied energy and a difference of at least 17% in the share of embodied energy between low energy and nearly zero energy buildings indicate that maybe LCEA should be considered in energy efficiency regulations along with further standardization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20460,"journal":{"name":"Procedia environmental sciences","volume":"38 ","pages":"Pages 554-561"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.123","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878029617301275","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

Towards the EPBD recast 2010/31/EU and the nearly zero energy building (nZEB), this review addresses the whole life cycle energy analysis of residential buildings. Life Cycle Energy Analysis (LCEA) of 90 case studies of residential buildings is evaluated with a specific focus on the normalization procedure that follows the principles of Product Category Rule (PCR) 2014:02 for buildings. The normalization procedure provided a minimization of the sample by considering issues of comparability, the omissions in the boundaries of the system, the LCI method and the updating on the energy efficiency definition of the building. Results indicate that the use of different LCI methods leads to an important fluctuation in the absolute values of embodied energy as the embodied energy of annZEB calculated with process analysis is lower than every case study calculated with hybrid input-output analysis without including nZEBs. The share of embodied energy in low energy buildings could reach up to 57% -or even up to 83% when renewable energy sources are used for electricity production- and in nZEBs up to 100% even though a significant reduction in the total life cycle energy is identified. The increase in embodied energy and a difference of at least 17% in the share of embodied energy between low energy and nearly zero energy buildings indicate that maybe LCEA should be considered in energy efficiency regulations along with further standardization.

体现能源与近零能耗建筑:住宅建筑研究综述
针对2010/31/EU的EPBD重塑和近零能耗建筑(nZEB),本文论述了住宅建筑全生命周期的能耗分析。对90个住宅建筑案例研究的生命周期能源分析(LCEA)进行了评估,特别关注了遵循建筑产品类别规则(PCR) 2014:02原则的规范化程序。标准化程序通过考虑可比性、系统边界的遗漏、LCI方法和建筑物能效定义的更新等问题,提供了样本的最小化。结果表明,不同LCI方法的使用导致了隐含能量绝对值的显著波动,因为采用过程分析计算的隐含能量低于不包括nzeb的混合投入产出分析计算的每个案例。低能耗建筑的隐含能源份额可以达到57%,当可再生能源用于发电时甚至可以达到83%,而在nzeb中,即使确定了总生命周期能源的显着减少,隐含能源份额也可以达到100%。低能耗建筑和接近零能耗建筑的隐含能量的增加和至少17%的差异表明,在进一步标准化的同时,在能效法规中可能应该考虑LCEA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信