Genealogi Moral Menurut Foucault dan Nietzsche: Beberapa Catatan

Yogie Pranowo
{"title":"Genealogi Moral Menurut Foucault dan Nietzsche: Beberapa Catatan","authors":"Yogie Pranowo","doi":"10.26593/mel.v33i1.2954.52-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article shows that what Foucault understands as genealogy is in many ways still in line with Nietzsche, that in terms of the basic concept of genealogy, using history, reveals the Herkunft – the origin of values that will dismantle the assumption of finality. Morality is born in the midst of a chaotic situation that forces individuals to make decisions and in the experience of a fragmented and unstable body. While through Entstethung one can see how the dominations that play behind any value are considered noble, the noble value is not in the hands of an independent subject. But there are also differences, since Foucault calls for the death of the subject, while Nietzsche is not up to that extreme. Another point of difference is that Foucault’s genealogy is practiced in a strict study discipline, wrestling with historical documents and writing down the detailed facts, while Nietzsche does not. The author argues that through Foucault’s thought, one might find a new meaning of the subject, that the subject is not an autonomous entity, but merely a production of power. The appearance of the subject is considered as a result of domination-relationships. In other words, these are the result of a disciplining effort.","PeriodicalId":18472,"journal":{"name":"MELINTAS","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MELINTAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26593/mel.v33i1.2954.52-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article shows that what Foucault understands as genealogy is in many ways still in line with Nietzsche, that in terms of the basic concept of genealogy, using history, reveals the Herkunft – the origin of values that will dismantle the assumption of finality. Morality is born in the midst of a chaotic situation that forces individuals to make decisions and in the experience of a fragmented and unstable body. While through Entstethung one can see how the dominations that play behind any value are considered noble, the noble value is not in the hands of an independent subject. But there are also differences, since Foucault calls for the death of the subject, while Nietzsche is not up to that extreme. Another point of difference is that Foucault’s genealogy is practiced in a strict study discipline, wrestling with historical documents and writing down the detailed facts, while Nietzsche does not. The author argues that through Foucault’s thought, one might find a new meaning of the subject, that the subject is not an autonomous entity, but merely a production of power. The appearance of the subject is considered as a result of domination-relationships. In other words, these are the result of a disciplining effort.
根据福ucault和Nietzsche的道德家谱
这篇文章表明,福柯所理解的系谱学,在很多方面仍然与尼采一致,在系谱学的基本概念方面,利用历史,揭示了Herkunft——价值的起源,它将拆除最终假设。道德诞生于一个迫使个人做出决定的混乱局面中,诞生于一个支离破碎、不稳定的身体的经历中。虽然通过Entstethung,人们可以看到任何价值背后的支配是如何被认为是高贵的,但高贵的价值并不掌握在一个独立的主体手中。但也有不同之处,因为福柯呼吁主体的死亡,而尼采并没有走到那个极端。另一个不同之处在于,福柯的谱系学是在严格的研究纪律中实践的,他与历史文献搏斗,写下详细的事实,而尼采则不是这样。作者认为,通过福柯的思想,人们可能会发现主体的新意义,即主体不是一个自主的实体,而仅仅是权力的产物。主体的外表被认为是支配关系的结果。换句话说,这些都是纪律努力的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信