A personal approach to hearing conservation: the key to effective second-level noise control

R. Steenkamp
{"title":"A personal approach to hearing conservation: the key to effective second-level noise control","authors":"R. Steenkamp","doi":"10.4314/ASP.V6I2.31599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The English term \"boilermaker's deafness\" was often used during the 1700 and 1800s. It referred to high-frequency sensori-neural hearing loss found in workers exposed to high levels of noise intensity. Second-level noise control relates to hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) and hearing protection (as well as hearing protection devices, known as HPDs). First-level noise control involves using modern engineering to quieten machines. Effective second-level noise control (hearing conservation) is required in the presence of noise. This article focuses on HPD trends, personal hearing protection and personal hearing conservation. Statistics gathered over the years have indicated that HCPs were and still are inadequate, and the assumption that workers are well-protected is a dangerous one. Despite all the HCP models and HPD types, noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) compensation statistics are still incredibly high. The multidimensionality of the problem necessitates a more personal and individualised approach to hearing conservation. This article reports on a study of HPD and HCP trends based on a questionnaire survey conducted with 55 specialist safety, health and environmental (SHE) managers in industry. The article describes a new paradigm of personal (custom-made) hearing conservation based on individual risk profiles, personal hearing protection, and higher HPD / HCP standards to prevent further spread of the irreversible and incurable NIHL pandemic.","PeriodicalId":41085,"journal":{"name":"African Safety Promotion","volume":"36 1","pages":"42-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Safety Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ASP.V6I2.31599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The English term "boilermaker's deafness" was often used during the 1700 and 1800s. It referred to high-frequency sensori-neural hearing loss found in workers exposed to high levels of noise intensity. Second-level noise control relates to hearing conservation programmes (HCPs) and hearing protection (as well as hearing protection devices, known as HPDs). First-level noise control involves using modern engineering to quieten machines. Effective second-level noise control (hearing conservation) is required in the presence of noise. This article focuses on HPD trends, personal hearing protection and personal hearing conservation. Statistics gathered over the years have indicated that HCPs were and still are inadequate, and the assumption that workers are well-protected is a dangerous one. Despite all the HCP models and HPD types, noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) compensation statistics are still incredibly high. The multidimensionality of the problem necessitates a more personal and individualised approach to hearing conservation. This article reports on a study of HPD and HCP trends based on a questionnaire survey conducted with 55 specialist safety, health and environmental (SHE) managers in industry. The article describes a new paradigm of personal (custom-made) hearing conservation based on individual risk profiles, personal hearing protection, and higher HPD / HCP standards to prevent further spread of the irreversible and incurable NIHL pandemic.
保护听力的个人方法:有效控制二级噪声的关键
在18世纪和19世纪,英语术语“锅炉制造者的耳聋”经常被使用。它指的是暴露在高水平噪音强度下的工人的高频感觉神经性听力损失。二级噪音管制涉及听力保护计划(HCPs)和听力保护(以及听力保护装置)。一级噪声控制包括使用现代工程来使机器安静。在噪声存在的情况下,需要有效的二级噪声控制(听力保护)。本文重点介绍了HPD的发展趋势、个人听力保护和个人听力保护。多年来收集的统计数据表明,卫生保健服务过去和现在都是不足的,认为工人受到良好保护的假设是危险的。尽管有各种HCP模型和HPD类型,噪声性听力损失(NIHL)的补偿统计数据仍然高得令人难以置信。问题的多维性需要一种更个性化和个性化的听力保护方法。本文报告了一项基于对55名行业安全、健康和环境(SHE)管理专家进行的问卷调查的HPD和HCP趋势研究。本文描述了一种基于个人风险概况、个人听力保护和更高的HPD / HCP标准的个人(定制)听力保护的新范例,以防止不可逆转且无法治愈的NIHL大流行的进一步传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
African Safety Promotion
African Safety Promotion SOCIAL ISSUES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信