Reading Feminism in Modern Tapestry’s Archive

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ART
K. Wells
{"title":"Reading Feminism in Modern Tapestry’s Archive","authors":"K. Wells","doi":"10.1086/714300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that modern tapestry’s archive reveals two lacunae in the history of modernism and addresses them through the dual practices of a feminist reading of the archives and an archival reading of feminism. The first lacuna is the role of women as not only artists but also producers of art, more broadly conceived. A feminist reading of the archive shows how women worked as “publishers,” weavers, widows, dealers, curators, and critics to produce tapestry and other forms of modern art. The second lacuna regards the role of the feminist art movement in transforming art history narratives, as feminists both recovered marginalized artistic practices and marginalized others that did not fit their political agenda. An archival reading of feminism shows how modern tapestry, as a relatively prestigious and masculine form of decorative art, would have complicated feminists’ simplification of modernism as misogynously opposed to decoration.","PeriodicalId":41204,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL","volume":"43 1","pages":"24 - 43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVES OF AMERICAN ART JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/714300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article argues that modern tapestry’s archive reveals two lacunae in the history of modernism and addresses them through the dual practices of a feminist reading of the archives and an archival reading of feminism. The first lacuna is the role of women as not only artists but also producers of art, more broadly conceived. A feminist reading of the archive shows how women worked as “publishers,” weavers, widows, dealers, curators, and critics to produce tapestry and other forms of modern art. The second lacuna regards the role of the feminist art movement in transforming art history narratives, as feminists both recovered marginalized artistic practices and marginalized others that did not fit their political agenda. An archival reading of feminism shows how modern tapestry, as a relatively prestigious and masculine form of decorative art, would have complicated feminists’ simplification of modernism as misogynously opposed to decoration.
阅读现代挂毯档案中的女权主义
本文认为,现代挂毯的档案揭示了现代主义历史上的两个空白,并通过对档案的女性主义阅读和对女性主义的档案阅读的双重实践来解决这些空白。第一个空白是女性不仅作为艺术家,而且作为更广泛意义上的艺术生产者的角色。对这些档案的女权主义解读展示了女性如何作为“出版商”、织工、寡妇、经销商、策展人和评论家,制作挂毯和其他形式的现代艺术。第二个空白是关于女权主义艺术运动在改变艺术史叙事中的作用,因为女权主义者既恢复了边缘化的艺术实践,也边缘化了不符合其政治议程的其他艺术实践。对女权主义的一份档案阅读显示,现代挂毯作为一种相对有声望的、男性化的装饰艺术形式,会使女权主义者对现代主义的简化复杂化,认为现代主义是厌恶女性的,反对装饰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书