{"title":"Constructing ensembles of dispatching rules for multi-objective tasks in the unrelated machines environment","authors":"Marko Djurasevic, F. Gil-Gala, D. Jakobović","doi":"10.3233/ica-230704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scheduling is a frequently studied combinatorial optimisation that often needs to be solved under dynamic conditions and to optimise multiple criteria. The most commonly used method for solving dynamic problems are dispatching rules (DRs), simple constructive heuristics that build the schedule incrementally. Since it is difficult to design DRs manually, they are often created automatically using genetic programming. Although such rules work well, their performance is still limited and various methods, especially ensemble learning, are used to improve them. So far, ensembles have only been used in the context of single-objective scheduling problems This study aims to investigate the possibility of constructing ensembles of DRs for solving multi-objective (MO) scheduling problems. To this end, an existing ensemble construction method called SEC is adapted by extending it with non-dominated sorting to construct Pareto fronts of ensembles for a given MO problem. In addition, the algorithms NSGA-II and NSGA-III were adapted to construct ensembles and compared with the SEC method to demonstrate their effectiveness. All methods were evaluated on four MO problems with different number of criteria to be optimised. The results show that ensembles of DRs achieve better Pareto fronts compared to individual DRs. Moreover, the results show that SEC achieves equally good or even slightly better results than NSGA-II and NSGA-III when constructing ensembles, while it is simpler and slightly less computationally expensive. This shows the potential of using ensembles to increase the performance of individual DRs for MO problems.","PeriodicalId":50358,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ica-230704","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Scheduling is a frequently studied combinatorial optimisation that often needs to be solved under dynamic conditions and to optimise multiple criteria. The most commonly used method for solving dynamic problems are dispatching rules (DRs), simple constructive heuristics that build the schedule incrementally. Since it is difficult to design DRs manually, they are often created automatically using genetic programming. Although such rules work well, their performance is still limited and various methods, especially ensemble learning, are used to improve them. So far, ensembles have only been used in the context of single-objective scheduling problems This study aims to investigate the possibility of constructing ensembles of DRs for solving multi-objective (MO) scheduling problems. To this end, an existing ensemble construction method called SEC is adapted by extending it with non-dominated sorting to construct Pareto fronts of ensembles for a given MO problem. In addition, the algorithms NSGA-II and NSGA-III were adapted to construct ensembles and compared with the SEC method to demonstrate their effectiveness. All methods were evaluated on four MO problems with different number of criteria to be optimised. The results show that ensembles of DRs achieve better Pareto fronts compared to individual DRs. Moreover, the results show that SEC achieves equally good or even slightly better results than NSGA-II and NSGA-III when constructing ensembles, while it is simpler and slightly less computationally expensive. This shows the potential of using ensembles to increase the performance of individual DRs for MO problems.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering (ICAE) was founded in 1993. "Based on the premise that interdisciplinary thinking and synergistic collaboration of disciplines can solve complex problems, open new frontiers, and lead to true innovations and breakthroughs, the cornerstone of industrial competitiveness and advancement of the society" as noted in the inaugural issue of the journal.
The focus of ICAE is the integration of leading edge and emerging computer and information technologies for innovative solution of engineering problems. The journal fosters interdisciplinary research and presents a unique forum for innovative computer-aided engineering. It also publishes novel industrial applications of CAE, thus helping to bring new computational paradigms from research labs and classrooms to reality. Areas covered by the journal include (but are not limited to) artificial intelligence, advanced signal processing, biologically inspired computing, cognitive modeling, concurrent engineering, database management, distributed computing, evolutionary computing, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, geometric modeling, intelligent and adaptive systems, internet-based technologies, knowledge discovery and engineering, machine learning, mechatronics, mobile computing, multimedia technologies, networking, neural network computing, object-oriented systems, optimization and search, parallel processing, robotics virtual reality, and visualization techniques.