The Management of Voluntary Abortion in Family Counselling Services. A Qualitative Study on the Role of Social Workers in Italy

IF 0.4 Q4 SOCIAL WORK
Alternativas Pub Date : 2023-01-23 DOI:10.14198/altern.21262
I. Testoni, Giulia Salvalaio, Sara Pompele, Adriano Zamperini
{"title":"The Management of Voluntary Abortion in Family Counselling Services. A Qualitative Study on the Role of Social Workers in Italy","authors":"I. Testoni, Giulia Salvalaio, Sara Pompele, Adriano Zamperini","doi":"10.14198/altern.21262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Elective abortion has always been considered taboo. The event can sometimes be experienced as traumatic, as the woman finds herself struggling against a range of emotions: fear, shame, ambivalence, and a sense of guilt. Multidisciplinary support is therefore fundamental to guide women during this complex phase, and social workers usually play a key role in the process. The present study aimed therefore to explore the experiences and perspectives of social workers who worked with women who decided to have abortions, focusing on the strongest and weakest aspects of their support process. Methodology. The study involved 10 social workers working in family counselling services in Italy. All of them were female, with a mean age of 47 years, and a mean of 16.7 years of experience in the field. The study followed a qualitative approach, based on semi-structured interviews that were studied following the principles of thematic analysis. Results. Three fundamental themes emerged from the data analysis: «Limits of the family counselling procedures and organization»; «The emotional dimension of elective abortion»; and «The issue of conscientious objectors». Discussion. The study highlighted how family counselling services are facing a crisis due to the lack of resources, personnel, and projects allowing for women’s proper sexual education and support. It also showed how the social worker’s role, which is fundamental, has instead been reduced, especially regarding elective abortions. Moreover, there was a lack of social and sanitary contexts integration and professional training that would provide the operators with specific skills and make them feel prepared to address such delicate situations. Conclusions. The need has emerged for a new, multidisciplinary perspective on the issue of voluntary interruption of pregnancy and social workers play a major role. However, the support system still presents many shortcomings for the women in need of assistance. The present study offers innovative and practical suggestions to properly fill these gaps.","PeriodicalId":36594,"journal":{"name":"Alternativas","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternativas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14198/altern.21262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Elective abortion has always been considered taboo. The event can sometimes be experienced as traumatic, as the woman finds herself struggling against a range of emotions: fear, shame, ambivalence, and a sense of guilt. Multidisciplinary support is therefore fundamental to guide women during this complex phase, and social workers usually play a key role in the process. The present study aimed therefore to explore the experiences and perspectives of social workers who worked with women who decided to have abortions, focusing on the strongest and weakest aspects of their support process. Methodology. The study involved 10 social workers working in family counselling services in Italy. All of them were female, with a mean age of 47 years, and a mean of 16.7 years of experience in the field. The study followed a qualitative approach, based on semi-structured interviews that were studied following the principles of thematic analysis. Results. Three fundamental themes emerged from the data analysis: «Limits of the family counselling procedures and organization»; «The emotional dimension of elective abortion»; and «The issue of conscientious objectors». Discussion. The study highlighted how family counselling services are facing a crisis due to the lack of resources, personnel, and projects allowing for women’s proper sexual education and support. It also showed how the social worker’s role, which is fundamental, has instead been reduced, especially regarding elective abortions. Moreover, there was a lack of social and sanitary contexts integration and professional training that would provide the operators with specific skills and make them feel prepared to address such delicate situations. Conclusions. The need has emerged for a new, multidisciplinary perspective on the issue of voluntary interruption of pregnancy and social workers play a major role. However, the support system still presents many shortcomings for the women in need of assistance. The present study offers innovative and practical suggestions to properly fill these gaps.
自愿堕胎在家庭辅导服务中的管理。意大利社会工作者角色的定性研究
介绍。选择性堕胎一直被认为是禁忌。这一事件有时会带来创伤,因为女性发现自己在与一系列情绪作斗争:恐惧、羞耻、矛盾心理和内疚感。因此,多学科支助对于在这一复杂阶段指导妇女至关重要,社会工作者通常在这一过程中发挥关键作用。因此,本研究旨在探讨与决定堕胎的妇女一起工作的社会工作者的经验和观点,重点关注她们支持过程中最强和最弱的方面。方法。这项研究涉及意大利10名从事家庭咨询服务的社会工作者。全部为女性,平均年龄47岁,平均工作经验16.7年。这项研究采用了一种定性方法,基于半结构化的访谈,这些访谈是按照主题分析的原则进行研究的。结果。数据分析产生了三个基本主题:“家庭咨询程序和组织的局限性”;“选择性堕胎的情感维度”;和“良心拒服兵役者的问题”。讨论。该研究强调,由于缺乏资源、人员和项目,家庭咨询服务面临危机,无法为妇女提供适当的性教育和支持。它还表明,社会工作者的基本作用是如何被削弱的,特别是在选择性堕胎方面。此外,缺乏社会和卫生环境的综合和专业培训,无法向操作员提供具体技能,使他们感到准备好处理这种微妙的情况。结论。已经出现了对自愿中止怀孕问题采取新的多学科观点的需要,社会工作者发挥了重要作用。但是,对需要援助的妇女来说,支助制度仍然有许多缺点。本研究为适当填补这些空白提供了创新和实用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alternativas
Alternativas Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
54 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信