Is it possible to identify ancient wine production using biomolecular approaches?

L. Drieu, M. Rageot, N. Wales, B. Stern, J. Lundy, Maximilian Zerrer, Isabella Gaffney, M. Bondetti, C. Spiteri, J. Thomas-Oates, O. Craig
{"title":"Is it possible to identify ancient wine production using biomolecular approaches?","authors":"L. Drieu, M. Rageot, N. Wales, B. Stern, J. Lundy, Maximilian Zerrer, Isabella Gaffney, M. Bondetti, C. Spiteri, J. Thomas-Oates, O. Craig","doi":"10.1080/20548923.2020.1738728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Chemical analysis of archaeological artefacts is used with increasing regularity to understand how wine was produced, traded, and consumed in the past and to shed light on its antiquity. Based both on an extensive review of the published literature and on new analyses, here we critically evaluate the diverse range of methodological approaches that have been used for wine identification. Overall, we conclude that currently none of the proposed chemical ‘biomarkers’ for wine provide unequivocal evidence. Nevertheless, valid interpretations may be offered if systematically supported by additional contextual data, such as archaeobotanical evidence. We found the extraction and detection method to be particularly crucial for successful identification. We urge the use of controls and quantification to rule out false positives. DNA sequencing offers potential for identifying wine and provides much higher taxonomic resolution, but work is needed to determine the limits of DNA survival on artefacts.","PeriodicalId":21858,"journal":{"name":"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20548923.2020.1738728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chemical analysis of archaeological artefacts is used with increasing regularity to understand how wine was produced, traded, and consumed in the past and to shed light on its antiquity. Based both on an extensive review of the published literature and on new analyses, here we critically evaluate the diverse range of methodological approaches that have been used for wine identification. Overall, we conclude that currently none of the proposed chemical ‘biomarkers’ for wine provide unequivocal evidence. Nevertheless, valid interpretations may be offered if systematically supported by additional contextual data, such as archaeobotanical evidence. We found the extraction and detection method to be particularly crucial for successful identification. We urge the use of controls and quantification to rule out false positives. DNA sequencing offers potential for identifying wine and provides much higher taxonomic resolution, but work is needed to determine the limits of DNA survival on artefacts.
是否有可能用生物分子方法来鉴定古代葡萄酒的生产?
对考古文物的化学分析越来越频繁地用于了解过去葡萄酒是如何生产、交易和消费的,并揭示其古老。基于对已发表文献和新分析的广泛回顾,我们在这里批判性地评估了用于葡萄酒鉴定的各种方法方法。总的来说,我们得出的结论是,目前提议的葡萄酒化学“生物标志物”都没有提供明确的证据。然而,如果有额外的背景资料系统地支持,如考古植物证据,可能会提供有效的解释。我们发现提取和检测方法对成功鉴定尤为重要。我们敦促使用对照和量化来排除假阳性。DNA测序为鉴定葡萄酒提供了潜力,并提供了更高的分类分辨率,但需要确定DNA在人工制品上的生存极限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信