A practical guidance on estimation of european wild ungulate population density

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Atenea Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.18239/atenea_2022.41.00
Vários Autores
{"title":"A practical guidance on estimation of european wild ungulate population density","authors":"Vários Autores","doi":"10.18239/atenea_2022.41.00","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the diversity of available methods and the geographical diversity of Europe, methodological harmonization is duly needed. The general aim of this guidance is to review the methods for estimating density in European wild ungula¬tes. This guidance is based in previous comprehensive reviews carried out by the ENETWILD Consortium, which propo¬sed general recommendations for practical implementation of methods to estimate wild ungulate density. We present 9 methods used in nineteen wild ruminant species and wild boar distributed across Europe, paying special attention to most practical methods for further implementation in the field to calculate reliable and accurate density estimates, allowing further comparable results over their distribution ranges. This guidance provides recommendations to select the methods to estimate the density and its implementations for ungulate populations with the aim of increasing the output quality (good accuracy and precision). The method should be used in a harmonized way: we provide detailed instructions for the design of most recommended methods, but specific protocols must be specifically adapted to local conditions. Every method on estimating reliable and comparable wild ungulate population density has some advanta¬ges and disadvantages depending on the habitat, the weather conditions and the benefit and do not discard their use if applied in a harmonized way. It arises from this guidance the need of developing a permanent network and a data platform to collect and share local density estimates, so as abundance in the EU.","PeriodicalId":43674,"journal":{"name":"Atenea","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atenea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18239/atenea_2022.41.00","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Given the diversity of available methods and the geographical diversity of Europe, methodological harmonization is duly needed. The general aim of this guidance is to review the methods for estimating density in European wild ungula¬tes. This guidance is based in previous comprehensive reviews carried out by the ENETWILD Consortium, which propo¬sed general recommendations for practical implementation of methods to estimate wild ungulate density. We present 9 methods used in nineteen wild ruminant species and wild boar distributed across Europe, paying special attention to most practical methods for further implementation in the field to calculate reliable and accurate density estimates, allowing further comparable results over their distribution ranges. This guidance provides recommendations to select the methods to estimate the density and its implementations for ungulate populations with the aim of increasing the output quality (good accuracy and precision). The method should be used in a harmonized way: we provide detailed instructions for the design of most recommended methods, but specific protocols must be specifically adapted to local conditions. Every method on estimating reliable and comparable wild ungulate population density has some advanta¬ges and disadvantages depending on the habitat, the weather conditions and the benefit and do not discard their use if applied in a harmonized way. It arises from this guidance the need of developing a permanent network and a data platform to collect and share local density estimates, so as abundance in the EU.
欧洲野生有蹄类动物种群密度估算的实用指南
鉴于现有方法的多样性和欧洲地理的多样性,方法的统一是必要的。本指南的总体目的是回顾估计欧洲野生蹄类动物密度的方法。本指南以ENETWILD联盟以前进行的全面审查为基础,该审查为实际实施估算野生有蹄类密度的方法提出了一般性建议。我们介绍了分布在欧洲的19种野生反刍动物和野猪所使用的9种方法,特别关注在野外进一步实施的最实用的方法,以计算可靠和准确的密度估计,允许在其分布范围内进一步比较结果。本指南为有蹄类种群选择估计密度的方法及其实施提供了建议,目的是提高输出质量(良好的准确性和精密度)。该方法应以统一的方式使用:我们为大多数推荐方法的设计提供了详细的说明,但具体方案必须特别适应当地条件。每一种估计可靠和可比较的野生有蹄类种群密度的方法都有一些优点和缺点,这取决于栖息地、天气条件和效益,如果以统一的方式应用,不要放弃它们的使用。根据这一指导方针,需要建立一个永久的网络和数据平台,以收集和分享当地的密度估计,从而在欧盟实现丰度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Atenea
Atenea HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The journal Atenea, published by the University of Concepcion, is published twice a year. Its objective is to circulate research and critical reflection in the area of Chilean and Latin American Culture. It includes relevant themes of different disciplines (literary, sociological, fine arts, historical, scientific, etc.), arising from research and studies coming from the university and intellectual areas of Chile and Latin America. It is a publication aimed at researchers, thinkers, artists and readers in general who are interested in the development of ideas, knowledge and critical intellectual dialogue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信