Disappearing the Enslaved: The Destruction and Recovery of Richmond's Second African Burial Ground

IF 0.2 4区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Ryan K. Smith
{"title":"Disappearing the Enslaved: The Destruction and Recovery of Richmond's Second African Burial Ground","authors":"Ryan K. Smith","doi":"10.5749/buildland.27.1.0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:The hilltop at the intersection of Fifth and Hospital Streets in Richmond, Virginia, served as the city's primary burial ground for enslaved and free blacks from 1816 through emancipation, making it one of the longest-serving and most populous burial grounds of its kind in the nation. The site's early history and active use show its profound role in the lives of the city's African American residents as well as intimate connections with resident whites buried in adjoining cemeteries. Yet today the burial ground stands as the site of an abandoned gas station, its historic core unrecognized like so many other smaller burial grounds for the enslaved elsewhere. By tracing the process of obliteration at Richmond's \"second African Burial Ground,\" this article illustrates how those in power—in this case a New South coalition of government officials, city engineers, and private developers—worked to truncate the highly charged memorial landscape related to human remains. The loss of this immense burial ground, untouched in the scholarly literature until now, underscores how essential the landscape and even human bodies are for the maintenance of social space and memory. As this site continues to face threats by roadway and railway projects and a proposed auction, it poses a key challenge to the concept of material \"integrity\" at the heart of federal preservation guidelines that have placed such properties at a disadvantage. As descendants and activists work to reclaim this burial ground without benefit of archaeological discoveries, the historic importance of its destruction may offer one of its few ways forward.","PeriodicalId":41826,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.27.1.0017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

abstract:The hilltop at the intersection of Fifth and Hospital Streets in Richmond, Virginia, served as the city's primary burial ground for enslaved and free blacks from 1816 through emancipation, making it one of the longest-serving and most populous burial grounds of its kind in the nation. The site's early history and active use show its profound role in the lives of the city's African American residents as well as intimate connections with resident whites buried in adjoining cemeteries. Yet today the burial ground stands as the site of an abandoned gas station, its historic core unrecognized like so many other smaller burial grounds for the enslaved elsewhere. By tracing the process of obliteration at Richmond's "second African Burial Ground," this article illustrates how those in power—in this case a New South coalition of government officials, city engineers, and private developers—worked to truncate the highly charged memorial landscape related to human remains. The loss of this immense burial ground, untouched in the scholarly literature until now, underscores how essential the landscape and even human bodies are for the maintenance of social space and memory. As this site continues to face threats by roadway and railway projects and a proposed auction, it poses a key challenge to the concept of material "integrity" at the heart of federal preservation guidelines that have placed such properties at a disadvantage. As descendants and activists work to reclaim this burial ground without benefit of archaeological discoveries, the historic importance of its destruction may offer one of its few ways forward.
消失的奴隶:里士满第二个非洲墓地的破坏和恢复
位于弗吉尼亚州里士满第五街和医院街交汇处的山顶,从1816年到解放时期,一直是该市被奴役和自由黑人的主要墓地,是美国同类墓地中服役时间最长、人口最多的墓地之一。该遗址的早期历史和积极使用显示了它在城市非裔美国居民生活中的深远作用,以及与埋葬在邻近墓地的白人居民的密切联系。然而,今天的墓地是一个废弃的加油站,它的历史核心没有被认出来,就像其他地方许多被奴役的小墓地一样。通过追踪里士满“第二非洲墓地”的毁灭过程,这篇文章说明了那些当权者——在这种情况下,一个由政府官员、城市工程师和私人开发商组成的新南方联盟——是如何努力截断与人类遗骸有关的高度负责的纪念景观的。这片巨大的墓地直到现在还未被学术文献触及,它的消失凸显了景观乃至人体对于维护社会空间和记忆的重要性。由于该遗址继续面临公路和铁路项目以及拟议的拍卖的威胁,它对联邦保护指导方针核心的材料“完整性”概念提出了关键挑战,该指导方针已将此类财产置于不利地位。由于后代和活动人士在没有考古发现的情况下努力开垦这片墓地,它的破坏的历史重要性可能提供了为数不多的前进道路之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Buildings & Landscapes is the leading source for scholarly work on vernacular architecture of North America and beyond. The journal continues VAF’s tradition of scholarly publication going back to the first Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture in 1982. Published through the University of Minnesota Press since 2007, the journal moved from one to two issues per year in 2009. Buildings & Landscapes examines the places that people build and experience every day: houses and cities, farmsteads and alleys, churches and courthouses, subdivisions and shopping malls. The journal’s contributorsundefinedhistorians and architectural historians, preservationists and architects, geographers, anthropologists and folklorists, and others whose work involves documenting, analyzing, and interpreting vernacular formsundefinedapproach the built environment as a windows into human life and culture, basing their scholarship on both fieldwork and archival research. The editors encourage submission of articles that explore the ways the built environment shapes everyday life within and beyond North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信