PATHFINDING THE “FIELD OF TRUTH”: GEDANKENEXPERIMENT, MACH'S PRINCIPLE AND THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL METHOD OF VARIATIONS

IF 0.2 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
A. A. Tyutyunnikov, D. Tereshchenko, V. F. Panov
{"title":"PATHFINDING THE “FIELD OF TRUTH”: GEDANKENEXPERIMENT, MACH'S PRINCIPLE AND THE PHENOMENOLOGICAL METHOD OF VARIATIONS","authors":"A. A. Tyutyunnikov, D. Tereshchenko, V. F. Panov","doi":"10.22363/2224-7580-2022-4-63-108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contributes to the development of an a priori methodology adequate to the legitimate claims of fundamental physics as a mathematical philosophy of nature. Husserl’s phenomenological method of variations - the most important part of this methodology - is seen as a means of bringing to clarity and achieving apodictic evidence, highly relevant in the current conditions of erosion of the empirical criterion of truth, when the invention of hypotheses for the needs of deductive theorization has become the norm of so-called fundamental research. As an example for express testing of the method, a problematic principle is taken that needs to be clarified: the “Mach principle” formulated in many ways since the time of A. Einstein. The result of a clarifying reflection of one of the transitions between versions of the principle is the conclusion that the conceptual development of the general theory of relativity on methodologically clarified grounds, one of which would be a correctly formulated Mach principle, should proceed from a relational understanding of space-time consistent with this principle. Mach’s principle, since it determines the structure of the equations of the theory themselves, the solutions of which are conceived in the modus of the possible, is in no way affected in its truth value by the fact of the existence of vacuum solutions of these equations. In conclusion, the article examines the question of the influence of the Mach theory of thought experiment on the genesis of the phenomenological method of variations.","PeriodicalId":46225,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2224-7580-2022-4-63-108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article contributes to the development of an a priori methodology adequate to the legitimate claims of fundamental physics as a mathematical philosophy of nature. Husserl’s phenomenological method of variations - the most important part of this methodology - is seen as a means of bringing to clarity and achieving apodictic evidence, highly relevant in the current conditions of erosion of the empirical criterion of truth, when the invention of hypotheses for the needs of deductive theorization has become the norm of so-called fundamental research. As an example for express testing of the method, a problematic principle is taken that needs to be clarified: the “Mach principle” formulated in many ways since the time of A. Einstein. The result of a clarifying reflection of one of the transitions between versions of the principle is the conclusion that the conceptual development of the general theory of relativity on methodologically clarified grounds, one of which would be a correctly formulated Mach principle, should proceed from a relational understanding of space-time consistent with this principle. Mach’s principle, since it determines the structure of the equations of the theory themselves, the solutions of which are conceived in the modus of the possible, is in no way affected in its truth value by the fact of the existence of vacuum solutions of these equations. In conclusion, the article examines the question of the influence of the Mach theory of thought experiment on the genesis of the phenomenological method of variations.
寻找“真理场”的路径:格丹肯实验、马赫原理与变型的现象学方法
这篇文章有助于发展一种先验的方法论,足以满足基础物理学作为自然的数学哲学的合法主张。胡塞尔的变型现象学方法——这一方法论中最重要的部分——被视为一种带来清晰和获得绝对证据的手段,在目前真理的经验标准受到侵蚀的情况下,当为演绎理论化的需要而发明假设已经成为所谓基础研究的规范时,这种方法是高度相关的。作为对该方法进行明确测试的一个例子,采用了一个需要澄清的有问题的原理:自爱因斯坦时代以来以多种方式表述的“马赫原理”。对这一原理的一个版本之间的过渡进行澄清性反思的结果是得出这样的结论:在方法上澄清的基础上,广义相对论的概念发展,其中之一将是正确表述马赫原理,应该从与这一原理相一致的对时空的关系理解出发。马赫原理,因为它决定了理论方程本身的结构,而这些方程的解是用可能的模态来设想的,所以它的真值丝毫不受这些方程的真空解存在这一事实的影响。最后,本文考察了马赫思想实验理论对变分法现象学起源的影响问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS
REVIEW OF METAPHYSICS PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信