Reading Romans 13:1–7 as a Hidden Transcript of Public Theology

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
D. Moe, James C. Scott
{"title":"Reading Romans 13:1–7 as a Hidden Transcript of Public Theology","authors":"D. Moe, James C. Scott","doi":"10.1163/15697320-20230085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nRomans 13:1–7 is a potential key text in determining the theological response of the churches in Myanmar to the 2021 coup. The text presents those who invoke its use with a dilemma that requires resolution and decision. Is it an oppressive text that justifies the coup and commands the church’s blind obedience to the coup-led state? Does Paul’s exhortation to be subject to the governing authorities’ (13:1) justify the line of the church’s uncritical obedience? Or does his description of the governing authorities as ‘servants for good’ (v.4) provide the basis for resistance to the coup conceived as adharma or untruth or evil? James Scott’s creative theory of hidden transcripts suggests that the text can be read as a script for a public theology that demands the church’s faithful disobedience to the coup. It invites a fresh reading of Paul being resistant to empire in a hidden and indirect way. Rom: 13.4 may then be placed in dialogue with Rom. 12:9 (‘resisting evil and loving good’). Through a hermeneutic of correspondence between Paul’s texts and contemporary protesters of the coup forms of everyday public resistance to the military power are disclosed. The text becomes a vehicle through which the goals of the resistance movement can be set in a biblical case for a public theology.","PeriodicalId":43324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Public Theology","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Public Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-20230085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Romans 13:1–7 is a potential key text in determining the theological response of the churches in Myanmar to the 2021 coup. The text presents those who invoke its use with a dilemma that requires resolution and decision. Is it an oppressive text that justifies the coup and commands the church’s blind obedience to the coup-led state? Does Paul’s exhortation to be subject to the governing authorities’ (13:1) justify the line of the church’s uncritical obedience? Or does his description of the governing authorities as ‘servants for good’ (v.4) provide the basis for resistance to the coup conceived as adharma or untruth or evil? James Scott’s creative theory of hidden transcripts suggests that the text can be read as a script for a public theology that demands the church’s faithful disobedience to the coup. It invites a fresh reading of Paul being resistant to empire in a hidden and indirect way. Rom: 13.4 may then be placed in dialogue with Rom. 12:9 (‘resisting evil and loving good’). Through a hermeneutic of correspondence between Paul’s texts and contemporary protesters of the coup forms of everyday public resistance to the military power are disclosed. The text becomes a vehicle through which the goals of the resistance movement can be set in a biblical case for a public theology.
阅读罗马书13:1-7作为公共神学的隐藏文本
罗马书13:1-7可能是决定缅甸教会对2021年政变的神学反应的关键文本。这篇文章给那些使用它的人带来了一个需要解决和决定的困境。这是一篇压迫性的文章,为政变辩护,命令教会盲目服从政变领导的国家吗?保罗要顺服掌权的(13:1)的劝勉是否可以证明教会不加批判的顺服是合理的呢?或者他对执政当局的描述是“为善的仆人”(第4节),这是否为抵抗政变提供了基础,而政变被认为是达摩、谎言或邪恶?詹姆斯·斯科特(James Scott)关于隐藏抄本的创造性理论表明,该文本可以被解读为一种公共神学的剧本,这种神学要求教会忠实地不服从政变。这让我们对保罗以一种隐蔽而间接的方式反抗帝国有了新的解读。罗马书13章4节可以与罗马书12章9节(“弃恶爱善”)进行对话。通过保罗的文本和当代政变抗议者之间的通信的解释学,揭示了日常公众抵抗军事力量的形式。文本成为了一种工具,通过它,抵抗运动的目标可以被设定在一个公共神学的圣经案例中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信