Polarized Perceptions: How Time and Vaccination Status Modify Republican and Democratic COVID-19 Risk Perceptions.

Biomechanica Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1080/17457289.2023.2216461
Evan W Sandlin, Daniel J Simmons
{"title":"Polarized Perceptions: How Time and Vaccination Status Modify Republican and Democratic COVID-19 Risk Perceptions.","authors":"Evan W Sandlin, Daniel J Simmons","doi":"10.1080/17457289.2023.2216461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies show Republicans have lower risk perceptions of COVID-19 than Democrats. Has this gap in risk perception been consistent throughout the course of the pandemic? Using longitudinal data from the Understanding America Study's <i>Understanding Coronavirus in America</i> longitudinal panel survey we examine how time and vaccination status have changed Republican and Democratic risk perceptions of engaging in various activities (such as grocery shopping, visiting friends and family etc.) as well as risk perceptions of infection, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19. We find that while Republicans have lowered their perceived risk of activity more than Democrats over time, vaccinated Democrats have lowered their perceived risk of infection, hospitalization, and death more than vaccinated Republicans. These results are robust to inclusion of media consumption and social media use. This divergence on the two measures of risk from COVID-19 may complicate leaders' efforts to move on from the politics of the pandemic toward a return to \"normal.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":30208,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanica Hungarica","volume":"6 1","pages":"624-642"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463727/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2023.2216461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous studies show Republicans have lower risk perceptions of COVID-19 than Democrats. Has this gap in risk perception been consistent throughout the course of the pandemic? Using longitudinal data from the Understanding America Study's Understanding Coronavirus in America longitudinal panel survey we examine how time and vaccination status have changed Republican and Democratic risk perceptions of engaging in various activities (such as grocery shopping, visiting friends and family etc.) as well as risk perceptions of infection, hospitalization, and death due to COVID-19. We find that while Republicans have lowered their perceived risk of activity more than Democrats over time, vaccinated Democrats have lowered their perceived risk of infection, hospitalization, and death more than vaccinated Republicans. These results are robust to inclusion of media consumption and social media use. This divergence on the two measures of risk from COVID-19 may complicate leaders' efforts to move on from the politics of the pandemic toward a return to "normal."

两极分化的认知:时间和疫苗接种状况如何改变共和党和民主党对 COVID-19 的风险认知。
以前的研究表明,共和党人对 COVID-19 的风险认知低于民主党人。这种风险认知上的差距在整个大流行过程中是否一直存在?我们利用 "了解美国研究"(Understanding America Study)的 "了解美国冠状病毒"(Understanding Coronavirus in America)纵向小组调查的纵向数据,研究了时间和疫苗接种状况如何改变了共和党人和民主党人对参与各种活动(如购物、探亲访友等)的风险认知,以及对 COVID-19 引起的感染、住院和死亡的风险认知。我们发现,随着时间的推移,共和党人比民主党人更多地降低了他们认为的活动风险,而接种过疫苗的民主党人比接种过疫苗的共和党人更多地降低了他们认为的感染、住院和死亡风险。这些结果在纳入媒体消费和社交媒体使用后是稳健的。COVID-19 的两种风险衡量标准的差异可能会使领导人从大流行病政治中走出来、恢复 "正常 "的努力变得更加复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信