[Treatment adherence and effectiveness of anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Faktor(VEGF) treatment of diabetic macular edema in the clinical routine : Comparison between cooperative and unicentric organization of treatment].

H Faatz, K Rothaus, D Westhues, B Heimes-Bussmann, M L Farecki, M Ziegler, M Gutfleisch, G Spital, A Lommatzsch, D Pauleikhoff
{"title":"[Treatment adherence and effectiveness of anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Faktor(VEGF) treatment of diabetic macular edema in the clinical routine : Comparison between cooperative and unicentric organization of treatment].","authors":"H Faatz, K Rothaus, D Westhues, B Heimes-Bussmann, M L Farecki, M Ziegler, M Gutfleisch, G Spital, A Lommatzsch, D Pauleikhoff","doi":"10.1007/s00347-019-00977-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an established method for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME); however, to ensure the best possible functional results continuous treatment of patients over a long period with regular control visits are necessary. The adherence of patients to the treatment is of great importance for success.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In order to make implementation of treatment easier for patients, an internet-based referral platform was established to enable the follow-up examination to be performed by an ophthalmologist using spectal domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) close to the patients place of residence. Based on 50 patients the effectiveness of this cooperative treatment (IT-Cooperation) was compared to 50 patients who were controlled in the treatment center for DME patients over a period of 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the IT-Cooperation group received an average of 6.3 injections in the first year of follow-up compared to the lower number of 5.2 injections for patients attending the treatment center. During the second year the average number of injections decreased to 2.7 (IT-Cooperation) and 2.4 (treatment center). Patients of the IT-Cooperation showed an average of 12.0 control visits in contrast to the average number of 9.6 visits (p < 0.01) for patients attending the treatment center in the first year of observation. This difference between the two groups was significant and was confirmed in the second year of follow-up with 8.3 visits in the IT-Cooperation group compared to 4.4 visits in the treatment center group (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The greater number of follow-up examinations close to the patient's place of residence for the IT-Cooperation group significantly improved the quality of treatment adherence in DME patients; however, intensive exchange of information between the ophthalmologist performing the control examinations and the treatment center where the injections were carried out is mandatory.</p>","PeriodicalId":11105,"journal":{"name":"Der Ophthalmologe","volume":"29 1","pages":"557-565"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Der Ophthalmologe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00347-019-00977-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intravitreal injection of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is an established method for treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME); however, to ensure the best possible functional results continuous treatment of patients over a long period with regular control visits are necessary. The adherence of patients to the treatment is of great importance for success.

Methods: In order to make implementation of treatment easier for patients, an internet-based referral platform was established to enable the follow-up examination to be performed by an ophthalmologist using spectal domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) close to the patients place of residence. Based on 50 patients the effectiveness of this cooperative treatment (IT-Cooperation) was compared to 50 patients who were controlled in the treatment center for DME patients over a period of 2 years.

Results: Patients in the IT-Cooperation group received an average of 6.3 injections in the first year of follow-up compared to the lower number of 5.2 injections for patients attending the treatment center. During the second year the average number of injections decreased to 2.7 (IT-Cooperation) and 2.4 (treatment center). Patients of the IT-Cooperation showed an average of 12.0 control visits in contrast to the average number of 9.6 visits (p < 0.01) for patients attending the treatment center in the first year of observation. This difference between the two groups was significant and was confirmed in the second year of follow-up with 8.3 visits in the IT-Cooperation group compared to 4.4 visits in the treatment center group (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: The greater number of follow-up examinations close to the patient's place of residence for the IT-Cooperation group significantly improved the quality of treatment adherence in DME patients; however, intensive exchange of information between the ophthalmologist performing the control examinations and the treatment center where the injections were carried out is mandatory.

[抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿临床常规依从性及疗效:合作与单中心组织治疗的比较]。
背景:玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)是治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)的一种成熟方法;然而,为了确保最佳的功能结果,有必要对患者进行长期持续治疗并定期进行对照访问。病人对治疗的坚持对成功至关重要。方法:为方便患者实施治疗,建立基于互联网的转诊平台,使眼科医生在患者居住地附近使用SD-OCT进行随访检查。以50名患者为基础,将这种合作治疗(IT-Cooperation)的有效性与在治疗中心控制的50名DME患者进行了2年的比较。结果:IT-Cooperation组患者在随访的第一年平均接受6.3次注射,而在治疗中心的患者平均接受5.2次注射。在第二年,平均注射次数下降到2.7次(IT-Cooperation)和2.4次(治疗中心)。it -合作组患者的平均对照就诊次数为12.0次,而it -合作组患者的平均对照就诊次数为9.6次(p )。结论:it -合作组患者在患者居住地附近进行更多的随访检查,显著提高了DME患者的治疗依从性质量;然而,进行对照检查的眼科医生和进行注射的治疗中心之间必须进行密集的信息交流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书