Development and Culture in the Context of Chittagong Hill Tracts (Cht), Bangladesh

IF 0.1 0 RELIGION
Sabiha Yeasmin Rosy
{"title":"Development and Culture in the Context of Chittagong Hill Tracts (Cht), Bangladesh","authors":"Sabiha Yeasmin Rosy","doi":"10.3329/ssr.v37i2.56507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to understand the background of development and draws a link to culture in the context of Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) - a post conflict region – to explore how the dispossession and commercialisation of culture in development planning is processing tension between different actors by reviewing secondary literature. The Indigenous people of Bangladesh have a longstanding history of struggle to achieve self-determination due to their institutional reference as ‘tribes’ or ‘ethnic minorities’. Denial of Indigenous peoples’ identity contributes to their discrimination and violation within the existing development concerns. The specific structural regulations and resource mobilization activities resulting from institutions – government, military, and powerful individuals - in areas inhabited by Indigenous people reflect the asymmetrical relations between Indigenous peoples and Bangalee actors. The conflict started in this region with the mobilization of ethnic majority Bangalee through the settlement programs in 1970s as a part of ‘development’ project, which later created tensions in this region due to the exploitation of people, land, and culture. As the government and ongoing military presence greatly shape ‘development’ for local people, the power relations between different actors facilitate the various forms of exploitative development projects. In addition, the ignorance towards integration of culture in development projects results in imposing threats to Indigenous peoples’ lives, livelihoods, and access to resources. This paper focuses on the economic expansions in this region from modernist perspectives drawing the example of tourism development in the CHT, which can marginalize and exploit Indigenous people in the making of ‘development’, \nSocial Science Review, Vol. 37(2), Dec 2020 Page 87-103","PeriodicalId":40271,"journal":{"name":"Catholic Social Science Review","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catholic Social Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/ssr.v37i2.56507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to understand the background of development and draws a link to culture in the context of Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) - a post conflict region – to explore how the dispossession and commercialisation of culture in development planning is processing tension between different actors by reviewing secondary literature. The Indigenous people of Bangladesh have a longstanding history of struggle to achieve self-determination due to their institutional reference as ‘tribes’ or ‘ethnic minorities’. Denial of Indigenous peoples’ identity contributes to their discrimination and violation within the existing development concerns. The specific structural regulations and resource mobilization activities resulting from institutions – government, military, and powerful individuals - in areas inhabited by Indigenous people reflect the asymmetrical relations between Indigenous peoples and Bangalee actors. The conflict started in this region with the mobilization of ethnic majority Bangalee through the settlement programs in 1970s as a part of ‘development’ project, which later created tensions in this region due to the exploitation of people, land, and culture. As the government and ongoing military presence greatly shape ‘development’ for local people, the power relations between different actors facilitate the various forms of exploitative development projects. In addition, the ignorance towards integration of culture in development projects results in imposing threats to Indigenous peoples’ lives, livelihoods, and access to resources. This paper focuses on the economic expansions in this region from modernist perspectives drawing the example of tourism development in the CHT, which can marginalize and exploit Indigenous people in the making of ‘development’, Social Science Review, Vol. 37(2), Dec 2020 Page 87-103
孟加拉国吉大港山区(Cht)的发展与文化
本文旨在了解发展的背景,并在吉大港山区(CHT) -冲突后地区的背景下与文化联系起来,通过回顾二手文献,探讨发展规划中文化的剥夺和商业化如何处理不同参与者之间的紧张关系。由于在制度上被称为“部落”或“少数民族”,孟加拉国土著人民有争取自决的长期历史。否认土著人民的特性助长了在现有发展问题范围内对他们的歧视和侵犯。在土著居民居住的地区,由政府、军队和有权势的个人等机构产生的具体结构法规和资源动员活动反映了土著人民和班加罗尔行动者之间的不对称关系。作为“发展”项目的一部分,20世纪70年代的定居计划动员了占多数的孟加拉人,冲突开始于该地区,后来由于对人口、土地和文化的剥削,该计划在该地区造成了紧张局势。由于政府和持续的军事存在极大地影响了当地人民的“发展”,不同参与者之间的权力关系促进了各种形式的剥削性发展项目。此外,由于不重视将文化融入发展项目,土著人民的生命、生计和获取资源的机会受到了威胁。本文从现代主义的角度关注该地区的经济扩张,并以CHT的旅游发展为例,在“发展”中边缘化和剥削土著人民,社会科学评论,Vol. 37(2), 2020年12月,第87-103页
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书