Gaining Substantial New Insights Into University Students' Self-Regulated Learning Competencies How Can We Succeed?

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Barbara Schober, Julia Klug, Gregor Jöstl, C. Spiel, M. Dresel, G. Steuer, B. Schmitz, A. Ziegler
{"title":"Gaining Substantial New Insights Into University Students' Self-Regulated Learning Competencies How Can We Succeed?","authors":"Barbara Schober, Julia Klug, Gregor Jöstl, C. Spiel, M. Dresel, G. Steuer, B. Schmitz, A. Ziegler","doi":"10.1027/2151-2604/A000201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a major issue in current educational research. A comprehensive body of evidence points to the relevance of SRL for creating lasting learning success in many learning contexts (Zimmerman & Schunk, 2011). SRL competences are of particular importance for success in higher education because students have to deal with rather unstructured contexts and diverse learning challenges (Peverly, Brobst, Graham, & Shaw, 2003). Despite SRL’s undeniable relevance and the large body of research attesting to this (Winne, 2005), some core issues – especially regarding learning at universities – have not been solved yet. We still do not know which components of SRL in which combination are crucial for success at university. Which aspects of SRL are relevant in which learning phases in which contexts? How do situational and personal factors interact? How do these competences actually develop under different institutional conditions? Why do we still find substantial knowledge deficits in this intensively researched field? A closer look makes it obvious that research often concerns very specific details of the complex SRL construct, such as the interrelations among specific SRL components, teachers’ effects on specific students’ SRL strategies, or the effects of very specific contexts (e.g., Eccles & Wigfield, 2002). Furthermore, a variety of research approaches are used, based on different models, measures, and study designs. Consequently, results are often inconsistent. Approaches and results therefore remain rather unconnected, and no comprehensive picture is able to emerge. However, if we want to create instructional designs that promote SRL at universities, we need a deeper comprehensive understanding of SRL competences and their development. To reach more coherence and advance in research on SRL competencies in complex learning settings like universities, we suggest an integrative approach in terms of theory and measurement in this opinion paper.","PeriodicalId":47289,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"64-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/A000201","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) is a major issue in current educational research. A comprehensive body of evidence points to the relevance of SRL for creating lasting learning success in many learning contexts (Zimmerman & Schunk, 2011). SRL competences are of particular importance for success in higher education because students have to deal with rather unstructured contexts and diverse learning challenges (Peverly, Brobst, Graham, & Shaw, 2003). Despite SRL’s undeniable relevance and the large body of research attesting to this (Winne, 2005), some core issues – especially regarding learning at universities – have not been solved yet. We still do not know which components of SRL in which combination are crucial for success at university. Which aspects of SRL are relevant in which learning phases in which contexts? How do situational and personal factors interact? How do these competences actually develop under different institutional conditions? Why do we still find substantial knowledge deficits in this intensively researched field? A closer look makes it obvious that research often concerns very specific details of the complex SRL construct, such as the interrelations among specific SRL components, teachers’ effects on specific students’ SRL strategies, or the effects of very specific contexts (e.g., Eccles & Wigfield, 2002). Furthermore, a variety of research approaches are used, based on different models, measures, and study designs. Consequently, results are often inconsistent. Approaches and results therefore remain rather unconnected, and no comprehensive picture is able to emerge. However, if we want to create instructional designs that promote SRL at universities, we need a deeper comprehensive understanding of SRL competences and their development. To reach more coherence and advance in research on SRL competencies in complex learning settings like universities, we suggest an integrative approach in terms of theory and measurement in this opinion paper.
对大学生自主学习能力的新认识如何取得成功?
自我调节学习是当前教育研究的一个重要课题。大量证据表明,在许多学习环境中,SRL与创造持久的学习成功相关(Zimmerman & Schunk, 2011)。SRL能力对于在高等教育中取得成功特别重要,因为学生必须处理相当非结构化的环境和多样化的学习挑战(Peverly, Brobst, Graham, & Shaw, 2003)。尽管SRL不可否认的相关性和大量的研究证明了这一点(Winne, 2005),但一些核心问题,特别是关于大学学习的问题,尚未得到解决。我们仍然不知道SRL的哪些组成部分和哪些组合对大学的成功至关重要。SRL的哪些方面与哪些学习阶段、哪些环境相关?情境因素和个人因素是如何相互作用的?这些能力在不同的制度条件下是如何发展的?为什么在这个被深入研究的领域,我们仍然发现大量的知识缺陷?仔细观察就会发现,研究往往关注复杂的SRL结构的非常具体的细节,比如特定SRL成分之间的相互关系,教师对特定学生SRL策略的影响,或者非常具体的语境的影响(例如,Eccles & Wigfield, 2002)。此外,基于不同的模型、测量和研究设计,使用了多种研究方法。因此,结果往往不一致。因此,方法和结果仍然相当不相关,无法形成全面的图景。然而,如果我们想要创造促进大学SRL的教学设计,我们需要对SRL能力及其发展有更深入全面的了解。为了使大学等复杂学习环境下的自主学习能力研究更加连贯和进步,本文从理论和测量两方面提出了一种综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology
Zeitschrift Fur Psychologie-Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.60%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信