Magnitude of Airway Problems at a University Teaching and Referral Hospital Recovery Room of Low Resource Setting-A Cross Sectional Study

Gebremedhn Endale Gebreegziabher, H. Tawuye
{"title":"Magnitude of Airway Problems at a University Teaching and Referral Hospital Recovery Room of Low Resource Setting-A Cross Sectional Study","authors":"Gebremedhn Endale Gebreegziabher, H. Tawuye","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Airway management is a basic life-saving intervention which is used when the patient’s breathing effort is compromised due to various reasons. Postsurgical patients are at risk of developing airway problems due to co-morbidities, intraoperative complications, surgery and anaesthetic drug effects. The severity of illness, analgesic drugs like narcotics and postoperative standard of monitoring may impact on breathing process of the patients. We aimed to assess the magnitude of airway problems at the recovery room. Methods and material: Cross sectional study conducted at a referral hospital recovery room, 2014. Standardized checklist used for data collection. All patients with airway problem who admitted at the recovery room during the study period were included in the study. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used. Results: One hundred seventy seven patients developed airway problems over five months duration. Of these, 47.5%, 32.2%, and 20.3% patients developed mild, moderate and severe airway problems respectively. The major airway problems were desaturation (62.7%), respiratory arrest (14.7%), aspiration (18.1%), bronchospasm (3.4%) and laryngospasm (1.1%) respectively. Factors associated with severity of airway problems were ASA status (P=0.031), type of trauma (P=0.026), intraoperative analgesia (P=0.020) and type of patient (P=0.049). The interventions made were ETTI or LMA (35%) patients, nasopharyngeal airway insertion (21.5%), oral airway (14.1%), oxygen supplementation (10.2%), surgical airway (9.6%), recovery position (7.3%) and emergency airway manoeuvre (2.3%) respectively. Anaesthetists involved in airway management in 30.5% of patients. Conclusion: The magnitude of airway problem was high. We recommend the availability of well trained staff for airway management and fulfilment of basic equipments and drugs for patient monitoring and resuscitation. High airway problems are an alarm for the need for well-equipped recovery room with well trained staff, patient monitoring and resuscitation materials.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"74 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Airway management is a basic life-saving intervention which is used when the patient’s breathing effort is compromised due to various reasons. Postsurgical patients are at risk of developing airway problems due to co-morbidities, intraoperative complications, surgery and anaesthetic drug effects. The severity of illness, analgesic drugs like narcotics and postoperative standard of monitoring may impact on breathing process of the patients. We aimed to assess the magnitude of airway problems at the recovery room. Methods and material: Cross sectional study conducted at a referral hospital recovery room, 2014. Standardized checklist used for data collection. All patients with airway problem who admitted at the recovery room during the study period were included in the study. Descriptive statistics and Chi-square were used. Results: One hundred seventy seven patients developed airway problems over five months duration. Of these, 47.5%, 32.2%, and 20.3% patients developed mild, moderate and severe airway problems respectively. The major airway problems were desaturation (62.7%), respiratory arrest (14.7%), aspiration (18.1%), bronchospasm (3.4%) and laryngospasm (1.1%) respectively. Factors associated with severity of airway problems were ASA status (P=0.031), type of trauma (P=0.026), intraoperative analgesia (P=0.020) and type of patient (P=0.049). The interventions made were ETTI or LMA (35%) patients, nasopharyngeal airway insertion (21.5%), oral airway (14.1%), oxygen supplementation (10.2%), surgical airway (9.6%), recovery position (7.3%) and emergency airway manoeuvre (2.3%) respectively. Anaesthetists involved in airway management in 30.5% of patients. Conclusion: The magnitude of airway problem was high. We recommend the availability of well trained staff for airway management and fulfilment of basic equipments and drugs for patient monitoring and resuscitation. High airway problems are an alarm for the need for well-equipped recovery room with well trained staff, patient monitoring and resuscitation materials.
低资源环境下大学教学转诊医院康复室气道问题严重程度的横断面研究
背景:气道管理是一项基本的挽救生命的干预措施,当患者的呼吸努力受到损害,由于各种原因。由于合并症、术中并发症、手术和麻醉药物的作用,术后患者有发生气道问题的风险。病情的严重程度、麻醉等镇痛药物以及术后监测的标准都可能影响患者的呼吸过程。我们的目的是评估恢复室气道问题的严重程度。方法与材料:2014年在某转诊医院康复室进行横断面研究。用于数据收集的标准化检查表。所有在研究期间入住康复室的气道问题患者都被纳入研究。采用描述性统计和卡方分析。结果:177例患者在5个月内出现气道问题。其中,47.5%、32.2%和20.3%的患者分别出现轻度、中度和重度气道问题。主要气道问题分别为去饱和(62.7%)、呼吸骤停(14.7%)、误吸(18.1%)、支气管痉挛(3.4%)和喉痉挛(1.1%)。与气道问题严重程度相关的因素有ASA状态(P=0.031)、创伤类型(P=0.026)、术中镇痛(P=0.020)和患者类型(P=0.049)。采取干预措施的患者分别为ETTI或LMA(35%)、鼻咽气道插入(21.5%)、口腔气道(14.1%)、补氧(10.2%)、手术气道(9.6%)、恢复体位(7.3%)和紧急气道操作(2.3%)。30.5%的患者有麻醉师参与气道管理。结论:患儿气道问题严重。我们建议提供训练有素的人员进行气道管理,并提供基本的设备和药物,以进行患者监测和复苏。高气道问题是一个警报,需要装备精良的恢复室,训练有素的工作人员,病人监测和复苏材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信