Isolated Pulmonary Recurrence After Resection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases—Is Resection Indicated?

D. Labow, J. Buell, A. Yoshida, S. Rosen, M. Posner
{"title":"Isolated Pulmonary Recurrence After Resection of Colorectal Hepatic Metastases—Is Resection Indicated?","authors":"D. Labow, J. Buell, A. Yoshida, S. Rosen, M. Posner","doi":"10.1097/00130404-200207000-00011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUNDResection of colorectal hepatic metastases is an accepted treatment modality for stage IV colorectal cancer. Concurrent or sequential pulmonary metastasectomy continues to be a controversial strategy. We analyzed factors that predicted pulmonary recurrence in patients with resected hepatic metastases and examined the efficacy of these combined interventions in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODSA retrospective review of a database of patients who underwent resection of colorectal hepatic metastases was performed to identify patients who either had synchronous pulmonary metastases (defined as pulmonary recurrence at the time of or within 3 months of hepatic metastasectomy) or subsequently experienced pulmonary metastases. Patient demographics, operative interventions, and overall survival were analyzed. Statistical methods included unpaired Student's t-test, actuarial survival and log-rank analysis. RESULTSTwenty-one patients (19%) had pulmonary metastases after hepatic resection, of which 12/21(57%) underwent pulmonary resection. No differences were observed between the resection group, the nine patients with pulmonary metastases who did not undergo resection, and the 87 patients without pulmonary metastases with regard to age, sex, race, or extent of hepatic metastases. When comparing the resected versus the unresected pulmonary recurrences, the disease-free interval from hepatic resection to detection of pulmonary metastases was 21 ± 20 months (range, 3–72 months) versus 16 ± 8 months (range, 4–25 months), respectively. All patients with pulmonary recurrence who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy had unilateral disease. Seven of 12 (58%) underwent wedge/segmental resections, and the remaining five (42%) required lobectomy in order to obtain a complete resection. Four patients who underwent pulmonary resection had multiple lung metastases (two to four lesions), and eight had isolated metastasis. There were no perioperative deaths in the pulmonary metastasectomy group. Contraindications to pulmonary resection included extensive pulmonary disease and concurrent extrapulmonary disease. A survival benefit was noted at 3 years for the resected versus the unresected group (60% vs 31%). Survival was no different between the resected pulmonary recurrence patients and the resected hepatic metastases only patients (60% vs 54%). CONCLUSIONSPulmonary metastasectomy can be performed safely and effectively in patients with recurrent disease after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Prolonged survival can be achieved with resection of isolated pulmonary recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer. Further studies that delineate selection criteria for pulmonary resection of colorectal metastases are warranted.","PeriodicalId":22430,"journal":{"name":"The Cancer Journal","volume":"69 1","pages":"342–347"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cancer Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00130404-200207000-00011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

BACKGROUNDResection of colorectal hepatic metastases is an accepted treatment modality for stage IV colorectal cancer. Concurrent or sequential pulmonary metastasectomy continues to be a controversial strategy. We analyzed factors that predicted pulmonary recurrence in patients with resected hepatic metastases and examined the efficacy of these combined interventions in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODSA retrospective review of a database of patients who underwent resection of colorectal hepatic metastases was performed to identify patients who either had synchronous pulmonary metastases (defined as pulmonary recurrence at the time of or within 3 months of hepatic metastasectomy) or subsequently experienced pulmonary metastases. Patient demographics, operative interventions, and overall survival were analyzed. Statistical methods included unpaired Student's t-test, actuarial survival and log-rank analysis. RESULTSTwenty-one patients (19%) had pulmonary metastases after hepatic resection, of which 12/21(57%) underwent pulmonary resection. No differences were observed between the resection group, the nine patients with pulmonary metastases who did not undergo resection, and the 87 patients without pulmonary metastases with regard to age, sex, race, or extent of hepatic metastases. When comparing the resected versus the unresected pulmonary recurrences, the disease-free interval from hepatic resection to detection of pulmonary metastases was 21 ± 20 months (range, 3–72 months) versus 16 ± 8 months (range, 4–25 months), respectively. All patients with pulmonary recurrence who underwent pulmonary metastasectomy had unilateral disease. Seven of 12 (58%) underwent wedge/segmental resections, and the remaining five (42%) required lobectomy in order to obtain a complete resection. Four patients who underwent pulmonary resection had multiple lung metastases (two to four lesions), and eight had isolated metastasis. There were no perioperative deaths in the pulmonary metastasectomy group. Contraindications to pulmonary resection included extensive pulmonary disease and concurrent extrapulmonary disease. A survival benefit was noted at 3 years for the resected versus the unresected group (60% vs 31%). Survival was no different between the resected pulmonary recurrence patients and the resected hepatic metastases only patients (60% vs 54%). CONCLUSIONSPulmonary metastasectomy can be performed safely and effectively in patients with recurrent disease after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases. Prolonged survival can be achieved with resection of isolated pulmonary recurrence after hepatic resection for colorectal cancer. Further studies that delineate selection criteria for pulmonary resection of colorectal metastases are warranted.
结肝转移瘤切除后孤立性肺部复发-是否需要切除?
背景:结直肠癌肝转移灶切除术是IV期结直肠癌的一种公认的治疗方式。同时或顺序肺转移切除术仍然是一个有争议的策略。我们分析了预测肝转移切除患者肺复发的因素,并检查了这些联合干预治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效。方法回顾性分析接受结直肠肝转移切除术的患者数据库,以确定同步肺转移(定义为在肝转移切除术时或术后3个月内肺复发)或随后发生肺转移的患者。分析患者人口统计学、手术干预和总生存率。统计方法包括未配对学生t检验、精算生存和log-rank分析。结果肝切除术后发生肺转移的患者21例(19%),其中12/21例(57%)行肺切除术。在切除组、未切除的9例肺转移患者和87例无肺转移患者之间,在年龄、性别、种族或肝转移程度方面没有观察到差异。当比较切除与未切除的肺部复发时,从肝切除到发现肺转移的无病间隔分别为21±20个月(范围,3-72个月)和16±8个月(范围,4-25个月)。所有接受肺转移切除术的肺复发患者均为单侧疾病。12例患者中有7例(58%)接受了楔形/节段性切除术,其余5例(42%)需要肺叶切除术以获得完全切除术。接受肺切除术的4例患者有多发肺转移(2至4个病灶),8例有孤立转移。肺转移切除术组围手术期无死亡病例。肺切除术的禁忌症包括广泛的肺部疾病和并发的肺外疾病。与未切除组相比,切除组在3年生存率上有明显提高(60% vs 31%)。切除肺复发患者和仅切除肝转移患者的生存率无差异(60% vs 54%)。结论对结直肠癌肝切除术后复发的患者行肺转移切除术是安全有效的。结直肠癌肝切除术后孤立性肺复发切除可延长生存期。进一步研究确定肺切除结肠转移瘤的选择标准是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信