Untangling Public Values: Incorporating Regime Values to Advance Research and Practice

IF 2.7 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Anna Wiersma Strauss
{"title":"Untangling Public Values: Incorporating Regime Values to Advance Research and Practice","authors":"Anna Wiersma Strauss","doi":"10.1093/PPMGOV/GVAB020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of “public values” is receiving increasing attention in the field of public administration. Much of the focus has been on the micro-level implications of public values for the behavior of bureaucrats and public institutions. This article argues that the public values approach could benefit from more systematic and detailed consideration of the macro-level implications of public values, that is, the nature of the public sector’s expected and legitimated contribution to society. Building on the work of John Rohr and Peter Overeem, it highlights how the concept of “prescriptive regime values” already provides a relevant foundation for this purpose and could help to untangle and better structure the plethora of public values currently found in the literature. To build and support this argument, the article reviews the public values literature, seeking to answer the following questions. First, what constitutes the public values perspective in public administration? Second, what are more “macro” public values? Where can they be found and how can they be characterized? Finally, what do “macro” public values do? To conclude, implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed, including a future research agenda that specifically incorporates prescriptive regime values as “macro” public values.","PeriodicalId":29947,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Public Management and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/PPMGOV/GVAB020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The concept of “public values” is receiving increasing attention in the field of public administration. Much of the focus has been on the micro-level implications of public values for the behavior of bureaucrats and public institutions. This article argues that the public values approach could benefit from more systematic and detailed consideration of the macro-level implications of public values, that is, the nature of the public sector’s expected and legitimated contribution to society. Building on the work of John Rohr and Peter Overeem, it highlights how the concept of “prescriptive regime values” already provides a relevant foundation for this purpose and could help to untangle and better structure the plethora of public values currently found in the literature. To build and support this argument, the article reviews the public values literature, seeking to answer the following questions. First, what constitutes the public values perspective in public administration? Second, what are more “macro” public values? Where can they be found and how can they be characterized? Finally, what do “macro” public values do? To conclude, implications for researchers and practitioners are discussed, including a future research agenda that specifically incorporates prescriptive regime values as “macro” public values.
理清公共价值:整合制度价值以推进研究与实践
“公共价值”概念在公共行政领域日益受到重视。大部分焦点都集中在公共价值观对官僚和公共机构行为的微观影响上。本文认为,如果对公共价值的宏观层面含义进行更系统和详细的考虑,即公共部门对社会的预期和合法贡献的性质,公共价值方法可能会受益。在约翰·罗尔(John Rohr)和彼得·欧维姆(Peter Overeem)工作的基础上,它强调了“规范性制度价值”的概念如何为这一目的提供了相关的基础,并有助于理清和更好地构建目前在文献中发现的过多的公共价值。为了建立和支持这一论点,本文回顾了公共价值文献,试图回答以下问题。首先,公共行政中的公共价值观是由什么构成的?第二,更“宏观”的公共价值观是什么?在哪里可以找到它们,它们如何被描述?最后,“宏观”公共价值有什么作用?最后,讨论了对研究人员和实践者的影响,包括未来的研究议程,具体地将规范性制度价值纳入“宏观”公共价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信