Political Economy of Non-Communicable Diseases: From Unconventional to Essential

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Reich
{"title":"Political Economy of Non-Communicable Diseases: From Unconventional to Essential","authors":"M. Reich","doi":"10.1080/23288604.2019.1609872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In January 2019, the Prince Mahidol Award Conference organized an international meeting on “the political economy of non-communicable diseases”—the first major global health symposium to include political economy in its title and as its frame for discussion. This commentary is based on a plenary presentation made at the start of the conference. The overall goal of PMAC 2019was “to foster and enhance global momentum for NCD prevention and control,” using a political economy perspective. The organizers called this “an unconventional outlook.” This commentary argues that political economy should become viewed as a conventional, indeed, an essential outlook for NCDs, and more broadly for global health. Political economy factors are integral to the problems of NCDs and therefore must also be integral to the policy responses. I have often argued inmy career for more attention to political economy in public health—for more attention to the political dimensions of health policy, especially for lowand middleincome countries. This undoubtedly reflects my training as a political scientist. Political scientists constitute a tiny disciplinary club in global health. Just as health economists have a significant organization and a global meeting every two years in the International Health Economics Association, so too should political scientists engaged in health policy issues. The study of politics remains on the margins in the global health community, despite decades of scholarship on this topic, while economics and economic analysis are squarely situated at the center. PMAC 2019 contributed to placing political economy analysis more visibly at the core of debates on global health policy. While a prolonged discussion of the definition of political economy is not appropriate here, some consideration of definitions is necessary to ensure clarity. In general, most definitions of political economy focus on how the distributions of political and economic resources affect something we care about: inequality, economic growth, some specific policy, who controls a country, or health. The analysis of political economy typically involves consideration of power,","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1609872","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

In January 2019, the Prince Mahidol Award Conference organized an international meeting on “the political economy of non-communicable diseases”—the first major global health symposium to include political economy in its title and as its frame for discussion. This commentary is based on a plenary presentation made at the start of the conference. The overall goal of PMAC 2019was “to foster and enhance global momentum for NCD prevention and control,” using a political economy perspective. The organizers called this “an unconventional outlook.” This commentary argues that political economy should become viewed as a conventional, indeed, an essential outlook for NCDs, and more broadly for global health. Political economy factors are integral to the problems of NCDs and therefore must also be integral to the policy responses. I have often argued inmy career for more attention to political economy in public health—for more attention to the political dimensions of health policy, especially for lowand middleincome countries. This undoubtedly reflects my training as a political scientist. Political scientists constitute a tiny disciplinary club in global health. Just as health economists have a significant organization and a global meeting every two years in the International Health Economics Association, so too should political scientists engaged in health policy issues. The study of politics remains on the margins in the global health community, despite decades of scholarship on this topic, while economics and economic analysis are squarely situated at the center. PMAC 2019 contributed to placing political economy analysis more visibly at the core of debates on global health policy. While a prolonged discussion of the definition of political economy is not appropriate here, some consideration of definitions is necessary to ensure clarity. In general, most definitions of political economy focus on how the distributions of political and economic resources affect something we care about: inequality, economic growth, some specific policy, who controls a country, or health. The analysis of political economy typically involves consideration of power,
非传染性疾病的政治经济学:从非常规到必要
2019年1月,玛希隆亲王奖会议组织了一次关于“非传染性疾病的政治经济学”的国际会议,这是第一次将政治经济学纳入其标题和讨论框架的重大全球卫生专题讨论会。这篇评论是根据在会议开始时所作的全体发言编写的。PMAC 2019的总体目标是从政治经济学角度出发,“促进和加强全球预防和控制非传染性疾病的势头”。组织者称这是“一种非传统的观点”。这篇评论认为,政治经济学应该被视为一种传统的、实际上是非传染性疾病乃至更广泛的全球健康的基本观点。政治经济因素是非传染性疾病问题的组成部分,因此也必须是政策反应的组成部分。在我的职业生涯中,我经常主张更多地关注公共卫生中的政治经济学——更多地关注卫生政策的政治层面,特别是对低收入和中等收入国家。这无疑反映了我作为政治学家的训练。政治科学家构成了全球卫生领域的一个小型学科俱乐部。正如卫生经济学家每两年在国际卫生经济学协会有一个重要的组织和一次全球会议一样,从事卫生政策问题的政治科学家也应该如此。政治研究在全球卫生界仍然处于边缘,尽管几十年来一直在研究这一主题,而经济学和经济分析则处于中心位置。PMAC 2019有助于将政治经济分析更明显地置于全球卫生政策辩论的核心。虽然在这里对政治经济学的定义进行长时间的讨论是不合适的,但为了确保清晰,有必要对定义进行一些考虑。一般来说,政治经济学的大多数定义关注的是政治和经济资源的分配如何影响我们关心的事情:不平等、经济增长、某些具体政策、谁控制一个国家或健康。政治经济学的分析通常涉及对权力的考虑,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信