Public Health Needs the Public Trust: A Pandemic Retrospective

SPG biomed Pub Date : 2023-05-30 DOI:10.3390/biomed3020023
Matthew T. J. Halma, Joshua Guetzkow
{"title":"Public Health Needs the Public Trust: A Pandemic Retrospective","authors":"Matthew T. J. Halma, Joshua Guetzkow","doi":"10.3390/biomed3020023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID crisis of the past three years has greatly impacted stakeholder relationships between scientists, health providers, policy makers, pharmaceutical industry employees, and the public. Lockdowns and restrictions of civil liberties strained an already fraught relationship between the public and policy makers, with scientists also seen as complicit in providing the justification for the abrogation of civil liberties. This was compounded by the suppression of open debate over contentious topics of public interest and a violation of core bioethical principles embodied in the Nuremberg Code. Overall, the policies chosen during the pandemic have had a corrosive impact on public trust, which is observable in surveys and consumer behaviour. While a loss of trust is difficult to remedy, the antidotes are accountability and transparency. This narrative review presents an overview of key issues that have motivated public distrust during the pandemic and ends with suggested remedies. Scientific norms and accountability must be restored in order to rebuild the vital relationship between scientists and the public they serve.","PeriodicalId":93816,"journal":{"name":"SPG biomed","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SPG biomed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed3020023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The COVID crisis of the past three years has greatly impacted stakeholder relationships between scientists, health providers, policy makers, pharmaceutical industry employees, and the public. Lockdowns and restrictions of civil liberties strained an already fraught relationship between the public and policy makers, with scientists also seen as complicit in providing the justification for the abrogation of civil liberties. This was compounded by the suppression of open debate over contentious topics of public interest and a violation of core bioethical principles embodied in the Nuremberg Code. Overall, the policies chosen during the pandemic have had a corrosive impact on public trust, which is observable in surveys and consumer behaviour. While a loss of trust is difficult to remedy, the antidotes are accountability and transparency. This narrative review presents an overview of key issues that have motivated public distrust during the pandemic and ends with suggested remedies. Scientific norms and accountability must be restored in order to rebuild the vital relationship between scientists and the public they serve.
公共卫生需要公众信任:大流行回顾
过去三年的COVID危机极大地影响了科学家、卫生服务提供者、政策制定者、制药行业员工和公众之间的利益相关者关系。封锁和限制公民自由使公众和政策制定者之间本已紧张的关系变得更加紧张,科学家也被视为为废除公民自由提供理由的同谋。对公众利益有争议话题的公开辩论的压制,以及对《纽伦堡法典》中体现的核心生物伦理原则的违反,加剧了这种情况。总体而言,大流行期间选择的政策对公众信任产生了腐蚀性影响,这在调查和消费者行为中可以观察到。虽然失去信任很难补救,但解药是问责制和透明度。本述评概述了大流行期间引发公众不信任的关键问题,最后提出了补救措施建议。必须恢复科学规范和问责制,以便重建科学家与他们所服务的公众之间的重要关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信