On Anatomical Enumeration and Difference in Early Sanskrit Medical Literature

Q2 Arts and Humanities
M. Selby
{"title":"On Anatomical Enumeration and Difference in Early Sanskrit Medical Literature","authors":"M. Selby","doi":"10.1163/15734218-12341453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nWhat does it mean to inventory all the components of the human body, and what do those inventories tell us about medical ideas and practice? I compare the lists of body parts in the śārīra-sthānas (sections relating to the body) of the Caraka-saṃhitā (ca. first century CE) and the Suśruta-saṃhitā (ca. second century CE). Rather than provide a detailed list of differences, I contemplate what these differences “mean” in terms of counting as a practice and of how we might think about these two texts as articulations of the concerns of the “theorist-physicians” of the Caraka-saṃhitā and the “anatomist-surgeons” of the Suśruta-saṃhitā. How might a close comparative reading of these passages—an “emic” reading, if you will—shed light on medical practice in early India and its relationship with metaphysical concerns, issues of selfhood, sexual “difference,” and the problem of understanding what cannot be seen with the naked eye?","PeriodicalId":34972,"journal":{"name":"Asian Medicine","volume":"90 1","pages":"263-276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15734218-12341453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What does it mean to inventory all the components of the human body, and what do those inventories tell us about medical ideas and practice? I compare the lists of body parts in the śārīra-sthānas (sections relating to the body) of the Caraka-saṃhitā (ca. first century CE) and the Suśruta-saṃhitā (ca. second century CE). Rather than provide a detailed list of differences, I contemplate what these differences “mean” in terms of counting as a practice and of how we might think about these two texts as articulations of the concerns of the “theorist-physicians” of the Caraka-saṃhitā and the “anatomist-surgeons” of the Suśruta-saṃhitā. How might a close comparative reading of these passages—an “emic” reading, if you will—shed light on medical practice in early India and its relationship with metaphysical concerns, issues of selfhood, sexual “difference,” and the problem of understanding what cannot be seen with the naked eye?
论早期梵文医学文献的解剖列举与差异
盘点人体的所有组成部分意味着什么?这些盘点能告诉我们关于医学理念和实践的什么信息?我比较了Caraka-saṃhitā(公元1世纪左右)和Suśruta-saṃhitā(公元2世纪左右)的śārīra-sthānas(与身体有关的部分)中的身体部位列表。我并没有列出详细的差异清单,而是考虑了这些差异在作为一种实践的计算方面“意味着”什么,以及我们如何将这两种文本视为Caraka-saṃhitā的“理论家-医生”和Suśruta-saṃhitā的“解剖学家-外科医生”所关注的问题的表达。对这些段落进行仔细的比较阅读——如果你愿意的话,这是一种“主位”阅读——如何揭示早期印度的医疗实践及其与形而上学关注、自我问题、性别“差异”问题的关系,以及理解肉眼无法看到的东西的问题?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Medicine
Asian Medicine Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Asian Medicine -Tradition and Modernity is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at researchers and practitioners of Asian Medicine in Asia as well as in Western countries. It makes available in one single publication academic essays that explore the historical, anthropological, sociological and philological dimensions of Asian medicine as well as practice reports from clinicians based in Asia and in Western countries. With the recent upsurge of interest in non-Western alternative approaches to health care, Asian Medicine - Tradition and Modernity will be of relevance to those studying the modifications and adaptations of traditional medical systems on their journey to non-Asian settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信