"Sovereign Democracy" and Russia's Relations with the European Union

Q2 Social Sciences
D. Averre
{"title":"\"Sovereign Democracy\" and Russia's Relations with the European Union","authors":"D. Averre","doi":"10.3200/DEMO.15.2.173-190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This article examines European Union-Russia relations against broader trends in Russian foreign and security policy. It assesses the prospects for a new agreement to replace the EU-Russia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, analyzes the recently appeared Russian concept of \"sovereign democracy,\" and considers the challenges Moscow's more assertive foreign policy presents to Europe. Keywords: democracy, European Union, foreign policy, Russia, security, sovereignty Introduction How are relations between the European Union and Russia, two entities whose interaction--especially in term of trade, energy markets, and security--is crucial to the future of the continent, conceptualized? On the one hand, positive developments appear to hold out the prospect of Russia's inclusion in a wider European political community. The establishment of high-level institutional arrangements--biannual summits, the Permanent Partnership Council Ministerial, and Ministerial EU Troika-Russia meetings--and the development of an increasingly dense network of contacts between officials and experts across wide areas of sectoral cooperation give Moscow a privileged and perhaps unique position among Brussels's many external partners. Russia's leaders frequently stress the importance of the country's \"European choice.\" On the other hand there are growing strains in the relationship. The lack of a coherent European policy for engagement with Russia or a common strategic vision, particularly regarding their shared neighborhood; a relatively narrow agenda for security cooperation; disputes over trade and energy issues; Moscow's insistence on a partnership between equals and the reluctance of Russian elites to accept the imposition of European norms and models; the \"values gap\" and concerns among Europe's policymakers about Russia's political, social, and economic development--all of these factors have combined to silence talk of Russia's \"systematic integration\" into Europe, or of \"Europeanizing\" Russia, and create a climate of limited pragmatic cooperation. One authoritative Russian commentator, not alone in his assessment, recently characterized the relationship in terms of \"economic rapprochement accompanied by complete geopolitical stagnation ... relations [with Europe] are respectable and calm but are not going anywhere in particular.\" (1) This article identifies the key assumptions underpinning Russia's dealings with the EU and examines them against broader trends in Russian foreign and security policy, which has recently undergone a notable--and perhaps decisive--shift. It falls into three parts. First, a brief critical analysis of the existing basis for EU-Russia relations as contained in the road maps for the four Common Spaces, (2) adopted at the May 2005 summit, and proposals for a new agreement to replace the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), whose initial term is due to expire at the end of November 2007, are presented and assessed. Second, we investigate the views of Russia's governing elite on the country's role in the international system and examine the ideas underpinning the concept of \"sovereign democracy,\" promoted by some elites as a kind of new national ideology. Finally, the challenges presented to Europe by Moscow's more assertive foreign policy, and particularly the implications for their shared neighborhood, are considered. Russia's foreign policymakers perceive an external security environment where Russian interests and values must be pursued competitively and that the underlying tension--unlikely to be resolved soon--between Moscow's preoccupations with sovereignty and national security on the one hand and, on the other, closer political, economic, and social engagement with Europe will continue to cause problems in the relationship. Beyond the PCA: What Kind of Future Agreement? The Common Spaces format signalled the failure of Brussels's earlier attempts to devise a suitable framework for relations with Russia through the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP)--essentially an attempt to project the integrationist logic of the European project into a wider \"external\" European security space by promoting convergence with EU norms and models. …","PeriodicalId":39667,"journal":{"name":"Demokratizatsiya","volume":"50 1","pages":"173-190"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"52","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demokratizatsiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3200/DEMO.15.2.173-190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 52

Abstract

Abstract: This article examines European Union-Russia relations against broader trends in Russian foreign and security policy. It assesses the prospects for a new agreement to replace the EU-Russia Partnership and Cooperation Agreement, analyzes the recently appeared Russian concept of "sovereign democracy," and considers the challenges Moscow's more assertive foreign policy presents to Europe. Keywords: democracy, European Union, foreign policy, Russia, security, sovereignty Introduction How are relations between the European Union and Russia, two entities whose interaction--especially in term of trade, energy markets, and security--is crucial to the future of the continent, conceptualized? On the one hand, positive developments appear to hold out the prospect of Russia's inclusion in a wider European political community. The establishment of high-level institutional arrangements--biannual summits, the Permanent Partnership Council Ministerial, and Ministerial EU Troika-Russia meetings--and the development of an increasingly dense network of contacts between officials and experts across wide areas of sectoral cooperation give Moscow a privileged and perhaps unique position among Brussels's many external partners. Russia's leaders frequently stress the importance of the country's "European choice." On the other hand there are growing strains in the relationship. The lack of a coherent European policy for engagement with Russia or a common strategic vision, particularly regarding their shared neighborhood; a relatively narrow agenda for security cooperation; disputes over trade and energy issues; Moscow's insistence on a partnership between equals and the reluctance of Russian elites to accept the imposition of European norms and models; the "values gap" and concerns among Europe's policymakers about Russia's political, social, and economic development--all of these factors have combined to silence talk of Russia's "systematic integration" into Europe, or of "Europeanizing" Russia, and create a climate of limited pragmatic cooperation. One authoritative Russian commentator, not alone in his assessment, recently characterized the relationship in terms of "economic rapprochement accompanied by complete geopolitical stagnation ... relations [with Europe] are respectable and calm but are not going anywhere in particular." (1) This article identifies the key assumptions underpinning Russia's dealings with the EU and examines them against broader trends in Russian foreign and security policy, which has recently undergone a notable--and perhaps decisive--shift. It falls into three parts. First, a brief critical analysis of the existing basis for EU-Russia relations as contained in the road maps for the four Common Spaces, (2) adopted at the May 2005 summit, and proposals for a new agreement to replace the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement (PCA), whose initial term is due to expire at the end of November 2007, are presented and assessed. Second, we investigate the views of Russia's governing elite on the country's role in the international system and examine the ideas underpinning the concept of "sovereign democracy," promoted by some elites as a kind of new national ideology. Finally, the challenges presented to Europe by Moscow's more assertive foreign policy, and particularly the implications for their shared neighborhood, are considered. Russia's foreign policymakers perceive an external security environment where Russian interests and values must be pursued competitively and that the underlying tension--unlikely to be resolved soon--between Moscow's preoccupations with sovereignty and national security on the one hand and, on the other, closer political, economic, and social engagement with Europe will continue to cause problems in the relationship. Beyond the PCA: What Kind of Future Agreement? The Common Spaces format signalled the failure of Brussels's earlier attempts to devise a suitable framework for relations with Russia through the European Neighborhood Policy (ENP)--essentially an attempt to project the integrationist logic of the European project into a wider "external" European security space by promoting convergence with EU norms and models. …
“主权民主”与俄罗斯与欧盟的关系
摘要:本文从俄罗斯外交与安全政策的大趋势出发,考察了欧盟与俄罗斯的关系。报告评估了取代《欧盟-俄罗斯伙伴关系与合作协议》的新协议的前景,分析了俄罗斯最近提出的“主权民主”概念,并考虑了莫斯科更加自信的外交政策给欧洲带来的挑战。欧盟和俄罗斯这两个实体的互动——尤其是在贸易、能源市场和安全方面——对欧洲大陆的未来至关重要,它们之间的关系是如何概念化的?一方面,积极的事态发展似乎为俄罗斯融入更广泛的欧洲政治共同体提供了前景。高层制度安排的建立——一年两次的峰会、常设伙伴关系理事会部长级会议和欧盟三巨头与俄罗斯部长级会议——以及官员和专家在广泛的部门合作领域之间日益紧密的联系网络的发展,使莫斯科在布鲁塞尔的众多外部伙伴中享有特权,也许是独特的地位。俄罗斯领导人经常强调该国“欧洲选择”的重要性。另一方面,两国关系也日益紧张。欧洲在与俄罗斯接触方面缺乏连贯的政策,也缺乏共同的战略愿景,尤其是在他们共同的邻国问题上;相对狭窄的安全合作议程;贸易和能源争端;莫斯科坚持平等伙伴关系,俄罗斯精英不愿接受强加于人的欧洲规范和模式;“价值观鸿沟”以及欧洲政策制定者对俄罗斯政治、社会和经济发展的担忧——所有这些因素加在一起,使俄罗斯“系统融入”欧洲或“欧洲化”俄罗斯的言论噤声,并创造了一种有限的务实合作氛围。一位权威的俄罗斯评论人士(并非唯一一位)最近用“经济和解伴随着地缘政治完全停滞……(与欧洲的)关系是令人尊敬的、平静的,但没有什么特别的进展。”(1)本文确定了支撑俄罗斯与欧盟打交道的关键假设,并将其与俄罗斯外交和安全政策的更广泛趋势进行了对比。俄罗斯外交和安全政策最近经历了一个显著的——或许是决定性的——转变。它分为三个部分。首先,本文对2005年5月峰会通过的四个共同空间路线图所包含的欧俄关系的现有基础进行了简要的批判性分析,并提出了一项新协议来取代伙伴关系与合作协议(PCA)的建议,该协议的初始期限将于2007年11月底到期。其次,我们调查了俄罗斯执政精英对该国在国际体系中的角色的看法,并考察了一些精英作为一种新的国家意识形态所推动的“主权民主”概念的基础思想。最后,本文考虑了莫斯科更加自信的外交政策给欧洲带来的挑战,尤其是对他们共同的邻国的影响。俄罗斯的外交政策制定者认为,在一个外部安全环境中,俄罗斯的利益和价值观必须通过竞争来追求,而莫斯科一方面关注主权和国家安全,另一方面与欧洲进行更密切的政治、经济和社会接触,这两者之间潜在的紧张关系(不太可能很快得到解决)将继续给两国关系带来问题。超越PCA:什么样的未来协议?“共同空间”的模式标志着,布鲁塞尔此前试图通过“欧洲邻国政策”(ENP)为与俄罗斯的关系设计一个合适的框架的努力失败了。ENP本质上是试图通过促进与欧盟规范和模式的趋同,将欧洲项目的一体化逻辑投射到更广泛的“外部”欧洲安全空间。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Demokratizatsiya
Demokratizatsiya Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Occupying a unique niche among literary journals, ANQ is filled with short, incisive research-based articles about the literature of the English-speaking world and the language of literature. Contributors unravel obscure allusions, explain sources and analogues, and supply variant manuscript readings. Also included are Old English word studies, textual emendations, and rare correspondence from neglected archives. The journal is an essential source for professors and students, as well as archivists, bibliographers, biographers, editors, lexicographers, and textual scholars. With subjects from Chaucer and Milton to Fitzgerald and Welty, ANQ delves into the heart of literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信