Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: Empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Santo Kočović-De, Danijela Milovanović-Rodić, Dunja Babović, I. Kuźma
{"title":"Empowering strategic priority areas of cultural policy: Empirical findings on cultural participation processes in Serbia","authors":"Santo Kočović-De, Danijela Milovanović-Rodić, Dunja Babović, I. Kuźma","doi":"10.5937/straman2200030k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The background of this research encompasses contemporary cultural policy issues and their factors of influence, with a special focus on cultural participation processes. The sphere of culture provides the fundamental base for reading and changing the paradigmatic paths through the contents and acts of formal and informal stakeholders. Culture is deeply interlinked with other departments of the entire economy by connections with feedback loops. The impacts of culture on the socio-economic and natural environment, as the \"fourth pillar\" of sustainable development, are recognized on the international level by theory, expert groups, and practice. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to bring about a deeper understanding of participatory processes and their importance for strategic priority areas of cultural policy development. Study design/methodology/approach: Our study design included institutional analysis, starting from the regulatory framework that reflects cultural policy and its strategic goals, by involving previous relevant theoretical research including the ICET model. Another objective of the paper is to answer a range of questions. What are participation processes' main characteristics and challenges in culture and cultural policy development? Is there a relationship between these challenges? How to achieve desirable cultural and institutional integrative transformations in order to accomplish the strategic priority areas of cultural policy? We bring the conclusions based on theoretic and empirical overview of new empirical research findings based on the survey conducted in 2022 for the need of EPICA research project Findings/conclusions: The findings of this research lead us to recognition, conceptualization and understanding of the existing participatory processes in culture, towards inspiring the future modelling of more integrative strategic and systemic solutions to reflect desirable and harmonized development. Limitations/future research: The limitations of research reflect future endeavour to contribute to reforming the field of culture (by formal and informal means) through more robust horizontal integration with other departments, to achieve sustainable and coherent effects through linking strategies, new forms of participation, decentralization, arm's length principle, and degrowth policy.","PeriodicalId":43778,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/straman2200030k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The background of this research encompasses contemporary cultural policy issues and their factors of influence, with a special focus on cultural participation processes. The sphere of culture provides the fundamental base for reading and changing the paradigmatic paths through the contents and acts of formal and informal stakeholders. Culture is deeply interlinked with other departments of the entire economy by connections with feedback loops. The impacts of culture on the socio-economic and natural environment, as the "fourth pillar" of sustainable development, are recognized on the international level by theory, expert groups, and practice. Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to bring about a deeper understanding of participatory processes and their importance for strategic priority areas of cultural policy development. Study design/methodology/approach: Our study design included institutional analysis, starting from the regulatory framework that reflects cultural policy and its strategic goals, by involving previous relevant theoretical research including the ICET model. Another objective of the paper is to answer a range of questions. What are participation processes' main characteristics and challenges in culture and cultural policy development? Is there a relationship between these challenges? How to achieve desirable cultural and institutional integrative transformations in order to accomplish the strategic priority areas of cultural policy? We bring the conclusions based on theoretic and empirical overview of new empirical research findings based on the survey conducted in 2022 for the need of EPICA research project Findings/conclusions: The findings of this research lead us to recognition, conceptualization and understanding of the existing participatory processes in culture, towards inspiring the future modelling of more integrative strategic and systemic solutions to reflect desirable and harmonized development. Limitations/future research: The limitations of research reflect future endeavour to contribute to reforming the field of culture (by formal and informal means) through more robust horizontal integration with other departments, to achieve sustainable and coherent effects through linking strategies, new forms of participation, decentralization, arm's length principle, and degrowth policy.
赋予文化政策的战略优先领域权力:塞尔维亚文化参与过程的实证研究结果
背景:本研究的背景包括当代文化政策问题及其影响因素,特别关注文化参与过程。文化领域为通过正式和非正式利益相关者的内容和行为来解读和改变范式路径提供了基础。文化通过反馈回路与整个经济的其他部门紧密相连。文化对社会经济和自然环境的影响,作为可持续发展的“第四支柱”,在国际上得到了理论、专家团体和实践的认可。目的:本文的目的是使人们更深入地了解参与性过程及其对文化政策发展战略优先领域的重要性。研究设计/方法/方法:我们的研究设计包括制度分析,从反映文化政策及其战略目标的监管框架开始,通过涉及先前的相关理论研究,包括ICET模型。本文的另一个目的是回答一系列问题。参与过程在文化和文化政策发展中的主要特点和挑战是什么?这些挑战之间是否存在联系?如何实现理想的文化和制度一体化转型,以实现文化政策的战略优先领域?根据EPICA研究项目的需要,我们对2022年开展的一项调查的新实证研究结果进行了理论和实证综述,得出了结论。研究结果/结论:本研究的结果使我们认识到,概念化和理解现有的文化参与性过程,以启发未来更综合的战略和系统解决方案的建模,以反映理想的和协调的发展。局限性/未来研究:研究的局限性反映了未来的努力,即通过与其他部门更有力的横向整合,为文化领域的改革(通过正式和非正式的方式)做出贡献,通过联系战略、新形式的参与、权力下放、保持距离原则和去增长政策,实现可持续和连贯的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Strategic Management
Strategic Management MANAGEMENT-
自引率
8.30%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信