Maximising Oil Recovery in Mature Water Floods Using Automated Pattern Flood Management

Edet Ita Okon, Joseph Adeoluwa Adetuberu, D. Appah
{"title":"Maximising Oil Recovery in Mature Water Floods Using Automated Pattern Flood Management","authors":"Edet Ita Okon, Joseph Adeoluwa Adetuberu, D. Appah","doi":"10.2118/198797-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n One of the most significant challenges for extending production life in mature waterflood fields is high water production. Couple with high reservoir heterogeneity, extensive layering and faulting, these fields often developed irregular flood patterns after decades of production which compounded the challenge to optimizing recovery from these fields. The severity of this problem can be seen in the Niger Delta oil fields where there are several matured fields that are producing at high water cut after many years of water flooding. The main objective of this study is to maximize oil recovery from a matured waterflood oil field while reducing the water cut. To achieve this objective, simulation studies were conducted on two cases scenarios. The first case was modelling and running waterflood simulation studied without applying pattern flood management (No PFM) while the second case scenario was done by exploring an automated pattern flood management (PFM). This was done with the aid of Petrel E&P software platform and ECLIPSE FrontSim to efficiently optimize the rate of water allocated to individual injectors. Using data from one of the oil fields operating in the Niger Delta, their performances were compared. The PFM gave the best result with a cumulative oil production of 30,727,470 STB when compared with the case of No PFM which gave a cumulative oil production of 26,968,224 STB (about 12% increase in oil recovery). The PFM water cut was 16% when compared with the case of No PFM which gave a water cut of 47% (about 63% reduction in water production). Hence, The PFM approach has made it possible to reduce water injection in more than 30% of the injectors while more than 62% of the producers experienced increase production and reduced water cut. The productivity increased upon automation of the workflow will enable engineers to identify the optimal injection allocation factors. It will also help engineers to understand and produce from the reservoir at an optimized decline rate and ensure the increase in ultimate recovery.","PeriodicalId":11250,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, August 07, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/198797-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the most significant challenges for extending production life in mature waterflood fields is high water production. Couple with high reservoir heterogeneity, extensive layering and faulting, these fields often developed irregular flood patterns after decades of production which compounded the challenge to optimizing recovery from these fields. The severity of this problem can be seen in the Niger Delta oil fields where there are several matured fields that are producing at high water cut after many years of water flooding. The main objective of this study is to maximize oil recovery from a matured waterflood oil field while reducing the water cut. To achieve this objective, simulation studies were conducted on two cases scenarios. The first case was modelling and running waterflood simulation studied without applying pattern flood management (No PFM) while the second case scenario was done by exploring an automated pattern flood management (PFM). This was done with the aid of Petrel E&P software platform and ECLIPSE FrontSim to efficiently optimize the rate of water allocated to individual injectors. Using data from one of the oil fields operating in the Niger Delta, their performances were compared. The PFM gave the best result with a cumulative oil production of 30,727,470 STB when compared with the case of No PFM which gave a cumulative oil production of 26,968,224 STB (about 12% increase in oil recovery). The PFM water cut was 16% when compared with the case of No PFM which gave a water cut of 47% (about 63% reduction in water production). Hence, The PFM approach has made it possible to reduce water injection in more than 30% of the injectors while more than 62% of the producers experienced increase production and reduced water cut. The productivity increased upon automation of the workflow will enable engineers to identify the optimal injection allocation factors. It will also help engineers to understand and produce from the reservoir at an optimized decline rate and ensure the increase in ultimate recovery.
利用自动化模式洪水管理实现成熟水驱采收率最大化
成熟注水油田延长生产寿命的最大挑战之一是高含水产量。由于储层非均质性高,层状和断层分布广泛,经过数十年的生产,这些油田经常形成不规则的洪水模式,这加大了这些油田优化采收率的挑战。这个问题的严重性可以从尼日尔三角洲油田中看到,那里有几个经过多年注水后处于高含水生产状态的成熟油田。本研究的主要目标是在降低含水率的同时,最大限度地提高成熟水驱油田的采收率。为了实现这一目标,在两种情况下进行了模拟研究。第一种情况是在没有应用模式洪水管理(No PFM)的情况下进行建模和运行水驱模拟研究,而第二种情况是通过探索自动化模式洪水管理(PFM)来完成的。这是在Petrel E&P软件平台和ECLIPSE FrontSim的帮助下完成的,可以有效地优化分配给各个注入器的水量。利用尼日尔三角洲一个油田的数据,比较了它们的性能。与No PFM的累计产油量26,968,224 STB相比,PFM的累计产油量为30,727,470 STB,效果最好(采收率提高约12%)。与没有PFM的情况相比,PFM的含水率为16%,没有PFM的情况下含水率为47%(约减少63%的产水量)。因此,PFM方法使超过30%的注水井减少了注水量,而超过62%的生产商实现了增产和降低含水率。自动化工作流程提高了生产效率,这将使工程师能够确定最佳的注入分配因素。它还将帮助工程师以最佳递减率了解和开采储层,并确保最终采收率的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信