Evaluation of Korean Firefighters’ Fitness Using Candidate Physical Ability Test: Pilot Study

Ji-Been Kim, Kyung-Tea Kim, Young-Seuk Cho, Dong‐il Seo, Wook Song, Han-joon Lee, H. Kang, Chung-Gun Lee, Yeon-Soon Ahn, Jung-Jun Park
{"title":"Evaluation of Korean Firefighters’ Fitness Using Candidate Physical Ability Test: Pilot Study","authors":"Ji-Been Kim, Kyung-Tea Kim, Young-Seuk Cho, Dong‐il Seo, Wook Song, Han-joon Lee, H. Kang, Chung-Gun Lee, Yeon-Soon Ahn, Jung-Jun Park","doi":"10.15758/ajk.2022.24.3.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES The Candidate Physical Ability Capability Test (CPAT) is a complex performance test to assess whether firefighters have sufficient ability to meet the physical demands of firefighting, and is widely used in many countries, especially in North America. In South Korea, however, simple basic physical fitness assessments are still used for firefighters’ fitness evaluation. Here, we report the physical fitness of Korean firefighters using the CPAT for the first time in Korea.METHODS Eighteen male Korean firefighters aged between 20 to 30 years participated in this study. All subjects were measured for maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) by using gas analyzer and cycle ergometer before CPAT. On a separate day, each subject performed CPAT with the best effort. Each subject’s oxygen consumption (VO₂), heart rate (HR) and completion time were measured during the CPAT. The results of CPAT were analyzed based on VO2max and HRmax and compared to the those of previous study from North American firefighter candidates.RESULTS VO2max was significantly (p< .001) lower and HRmax was significantly (p< .05) higher in Korean firefighters (45.4±4.6 ml/kg/min and 194.2±2.1 beat/min) than American firefighter candidates (53.0±7.4 ml/kg/min and 188.0±8.0 beat/min). During CPAT, Korean firefighters showed 69.4±15.8 %VO2max and 87.6±7.8 %HRmax and American firefighter candidates had 73.1±8.0 %VO2max and 90.1±5.3 %HRmax, but these were not statistically significant. However, the completed time of CPAT was significantly slower in Korean firefighters than American firefighter candidates (726.8±84.6 sec vs. 512.0±51.0 sec, p<.001).CONCLUSIONS Korean firefighters have lower cardiorespiratory endurance capacity and CPAT performance than American firefighter candidates. In addition, Korean firefighters did not complete the CPAT within the pass time limit. It suggests that Korean firefighters need to improve more physical ability for physical demands of firefighting.","PeriodicalId":22264,"journal":{"name":"The Asian Journal of Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Asian Journal of Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15758/ajk.2022.24.3.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The Candidate Physical Ability Capability Test (CPAT) is a complex performance test to assess whether firefighters have sufficient ability to meet the physical demands of firefighting, and is widely used in many countries, especially in North America. In South Korea, however, simple basic physical fitness assessments are still used for firefighters’ fitness evaluation. Here, we report the physical fitness of Korean firefighters using the CPAT for the first time in Korea.METHODS Eighteen male Korean firefighters aged between 20 to 30 years participated in this study. All subjects were measured for maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) by using gas analyzer and cycle ergometer before CPAT. On a separate day, each subject performed CPAT with the best effort. Each subject’s oxygen consumption (VO₂), heart rate (HR) and completion time were measured during the CPAT. The results of CPAT were analyzed based on VO2max and HRmax and compared to the those of previous study from North American firefighter candidates.RESULTS VO2max was significantly (p< .001) lower and HRmax was significantly (p< .05) higher in Korean firefighters (45.4±4.6 ml/kg/min and 194.2±2.1 beat/min) than American firefighter candidates (53.0±7.4 ml/kg/min and 188.0±8.0 beat/min). During CPAT, Korean firefighters showed 69.4±15.8 %VO2max and 87.6±7.8 %HRmax and American firefighter candidates had 73.1±8.0 %VO2max and 90.1±5.3 %HRmax, but these were not statistically significant. However, the completed time of CPAT was significantly slower in Korean firefighters than American firefighter candidates (726.8±84.6 sec vs. 512.0±51.0 sec, p<.001).CONCLUSIONS Korean firefighters have lower cardiorespiratory endurance capacity and CPAT performance than American firefighter candidates. In addition, Korean firefighters did not complete the CPAT within the pass time limit. It suggests that Korean firefighters need to improve more physical ability for physical demands of firefighting.
运用候选体能测试评价韩国消防员体能:初步研究
目的候选体能能力测试(Candidate Physical Ability Capability Test, CPAT)是一项复杂的性能测试,用于评估消防员是否有足够的能力来满足消防的身体需求,在许多国家,尤其是北美地区被广泛使用。然而,在韩国,消防员的体能评估仍然采用简单的基本体能评估。在这里,我们报告了韩国消防员首次使用CPAT的身体素质。方法选取18名年龄在20 ~ 30岁的韩国男性消防员为研究对象。在CPAT前用气体分析仪和循环测功仪测定所有受试者的最大耗氧量(VO2max)。在单独的一天,每个受试者都以最大的努力完成CPAT。在CPAT期间测量每位受试者的耗氧量(vo2)、心率(HR)和完成时间。CPAT结果基于VO2max和HRmax进行分析,并与先前对北美消防员候选人的研究结果进行比较。结果韩国消防员的VO2max(45.4±4.6 ml/kg/min, 194.2±2.1 beat/min)显著低于美国消防员(53.0±7.4 ml/kg/min, 188.0±8.0 beat/min), HRmax显著高于美国消防员(p< 0.001)。在CPAT中,韩国消防员的VO2max为69.4±15.8%,HRmax为87.6±7.8%,美国消防员的VO2max为73.1±8.0%,HRmax为90.1±5.3%,但差异无统计学意义。然而,韩国消防员完成CPAT的时间明显慢于美国消防员(726.8±84.6秒比512.0±51.0秒,p< 0.001)。结论韩国消防员的心肺耐力和CPAT表现低于美国消防员候选人。此外,韩国消防员也没有在规定时间内完成CPAT考试。这表明,韩国消防队员需要提高体力,以适应消防的体力要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信