An Approach to the Argumentation in the “Front Line’s” Discourse in Colombia

IF 2.1 3区社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES

South Atlantic Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-01-20 DOI:10.1215/00382876-9663744

Farid Abud

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article contributes to our understanding the uprising that took place in Colombia in 2021, providing an exploratory approach to the argumentative discourse deployed by the so-called front line (one of the key participants in the uprising). The author examines the points of view put forward by the front line, attempting to determine how they account for the social, economic, and political conditions in which they were produced. The article analyzes the types of arguments that recur in that discourse and reflects on how actancial roles are taken up in the argumentation.

查看原文本刊更多论文

哥伦比亚“前线”话语中的论证探析

本文有助于我们理解2021年发生在哥伦比亚的起义，为所谓的前线(起义的关键参与者之一)部署的争论性话语提供了一种探索性方法。作者考察了前线提出的观点，试图确定这些观点是如何解释产生这些观点的社会、经济和政治条件的。本文分析了在该论述中反复出现的论证类型，并反思了在论证中财务角色是如何被承担的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

South Atlantic Quarterly Multiple-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Individual subscribers and institutions with electronic access can view issues of the South Atlantic Quarterly online. If you have not signed up, review the first-time access instructions. Founded amid controversy in 1901, the South Atlantic Quarterly continues to cover the beat, center and fringe, with bold analyses of the current scene—national, cultural, intellectual—worldwide. Now published exclusively in special issues, this vanguard centenarian journal is tackling embattled states, evaluating postmodernity"s influential writers and intellectuals, and examining a wide range of cultural phenomena.