Seed Systems Resilience—An Overview

N. Louwaars, G. Manicad
{"title":"Seed Systems Resilience—An Overview","authors":"N. Louwaars, G. Manicad","doi":"10.3390/seeds1040028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Seeds are a basic input for all crop production. Good seed is crucial for the global food and nutrition security, for rural development and farmers’ livelihoods and for all green value chains. What “good seed” is depends on individual farmer’s needs. The sustainable availability of seed and seed choice is thus an essential issue for every farmer. Farmers access seeds from multiple sources. Different seed systems have their strengths and vulnerabilities. With changing farming conditions around the world due to climate change, soil degradation and market demands, an analysis of possible disruptions and general future-proofing appears necessary. Such analysis also informs the kinds of support that different seed systems may need to be optimally resilient. Given the very limited studies on resilience of current seed systems, we performed a literature review on the opportunities and vulnerabilities of seed systems to identify possible resilience challenges. Seed system resilience in terms of future-proofing is closely linked with “seed security”, the secured access to preferred seeds by farmers. Such resilience depends on the functioning of each of the formal and farmers’ seed systems and how these two systems complement each other, particularly when one falters. In this paper, we describe the major characteristics of seed systems, analyze their strength and vulnerabilities, and describe support functions toward future-proofing them. Both the farmers’ and the formal seed systems are increasingly facing varying forms and degrees of sustainability challenges. These require various types of support. Farmers’ seed systems may find it hard to respond to radically changing conditions without support. Commercial formal seed systems are less vulnerable, as they generally are better equipped to respond to the (changing) needs of their customers. Commercial formal seed systems, however, only serve those farmers that are able and willing to pay for quality seeds. This immediately indicates a significant limitation. A common feature of both formal and farmers’ systems is their dependence on the continuous flow and capacity to use a diversity of plant genetic resources. In conclusion, no single seed system can be considered totally resilient and thus future-proof without specific external support.","PeriodicalId":85504,"journal":{"name":"Seeds (New York, N.Y.)","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seeds (New York, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/seeds1040028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Seeds are a basic input for all crop production. Good seed is crucial for the global food and nutrition security, for rural development and farmers’ livelihoods and for all green value chains. What “good seed” is depends on individual farmer’s needs. The sustainable availability of seed and seed choice is thus an essential issue for every farmer. Farmers access seeds from multiple sources. Different seed systems have their strengths and vulnerabilities. With changing farming conditions around the world due to climate change, soil degradation and market demands, an analysis of possible disruptions and general future-proofing appears necessary. Such analysis also informs the kinds of support that different seed systems may need to be optimally resilient. Given the very limited studies on resilience of current seed systems, we performed a literature review on the opportunities and vulnerabilities of seed systems to identify possible resilience challenges. Seed system resilience in terms of future-proofing is closely linked with “seed security”, the secured access to preferred seeds by farmers. Such resilience depends on the functioning of each of the formal and farmers’ seed systems and how these two systems complement each other, particularly when one falters. In this paper, we describe the major characteristics of seed systems, analyze their strength and vulnerabilities, and describe support functions toward future-proofing them. Both the farmers’ and the formal seed systems are increasingly facing varying forms and degrees of sustainability challenges. These require various types of support. Farmers’ seed systems may find it hard to respond to radically changing conditions without support. Commercial formal seed systems are less vulnerable, as they generally are better equipped to respond to the (changing) needs of their customers. Commercial formal seed systems, however, only serve those farmers that are able and willing to pay for quality seeds. This immediately indicates a significant limitation. A common feature of both formal and farmers’ systems is their dependence on the continuous flow and capacity to use a diversity of plant genetic resources. In conclusion, no single seed system can be considered totally resilient and thus future-proof without specific external support.
种子系统弹性-概述
种子是所有作物生产的基本投入。优质种子对全球粮食和营养安全、农村发展和农民生计以及所有绿色价值链都至关重要。什么是“好种子”取决于每个农民的需求。因此,种子的可持续供应和种子选择对每个农民来说都是一个至关重要的问题。农民从多种渠道获取种子。不同的种子系统各有优缺点。由于气候变化、土壤退化和市场需求,世界各地的农业条件不断变化,因此有必要对可能出现的破坏和总体的未来防护进行分析。这样的分析还告诉我们,不同的种子系统可能需要什么样的支持才能获得最佳的恢复能力。鉴于目前对种子系统弹性的研究非常有限,我们对种子系统的机会和脆弱性进行了文献综述,以确定可能的弹性挑战。种子系统的抗灾能力与“种子安全”密切相关,即农民有保障地获得首选种子。这种恢复力取决于正规和农民种子系统各自的功能,以及这两个系统如何相互补充,特别是当其中一个系统出现问题时。本文描述了种子系统的主要特征,分析了种子系统的优势和脆弱性,并描述了种子系统的支持功能。农民和正规种子系统都日益面临不同形式和程度的可持续性挑战。这需要各种类型的支持。如果没有支持,农民的种子系统可能很难对急剧变化的环境做出反应。商业正规种子系统不那么脆弱,因为它们通常能够更好地响应客户(不断变化的)需求。然而,商业正规种子系统只服务于那些有能力并且愿意购买优质种子的农民。这立即表明了一个重要的限制。正规系统和农民系统的一个共同特点是,它们都依赖于植物遗传资源的持续流动和利用多样性的能力。总之,没有特定的外部支持,任何单一的种子系统都不能被认为是完全有弹性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信