A trend of cumulative trauma disorders in indian computer users: A comparison of surveys of the year 2009 versus 2019

Pooja Mehta, Chandanbala Maru
{"title":"A trend of cumulative trauma disorders in indian computer users: A comparison of surveys of the year 2009 versus 2019","authors":"Pooja Mehta, Chandanbala Maru","doi":"10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_6_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Digitalization has resulted in increased computer use. Computer use involves repetitive movements and relatively static posture of neck, limbs, and trunk, contributing in cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs). Over a decade, ergonomic awareness has increased, but CTDs have prevailed. Objective: A comparison of 2009 versus 2019 surveys was done to understand CTD trends and to find the significance of the number of people affected due to hours per day computer use. Study Design: A comparison of two surveys was conducted to research trend in occurrences of CTDs. Methods: The sampling was done using the snowball method. Both surveys had identical research methodology and collected data of (n) 100 computer users of India with an age range of 20–50 years, i.e., total of N = 200 in combined surveys. Participants filled in the self-explanatory questionnaire on Google Forms that assessed areas of CTD pain, severity of pain, and functional performance during pain. Results: Data analysis showed a higher percentage of pain in the neck, eye strain, and back pain in computer users in both 2009 and 2019 surveys. There was an overall decrease in the percentage of computer users affected with CTDs from 86% to 70%, but anatomically, an increase in percentages of pain in the upper limb, headaches, and lower-back pain was reported in 2019. The relation between duration of computer use and number of computer users affected was found to be nonsignificant for both 2009 and 2019 surveys (χ[2] = 3.5408; P = 1.7027 and χ[2] = 1.3739; P = 0.5031, respectively, 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.605, 7.378]). Spearman's correlation showed no significant correlation between duration of computer use and severity of pain in both 2009 (r = 0.078; P = 0.443, 95% CI [−0.120, 0.270]) and 2019 (r = −0.085; P = 0.398, 95% CI [−0.277, 0.114]). Conclusion: The comparison of 2009 and 2019 surveys showed an overall decrease in the percentage of computer users affected with CTDs in the 2019 survey. An increase in upper-limb pain, headache, and lower-back ache percentages was noted, while upper-back pain, neck pain, and eye strain percentage showed a decreasing trend in the 2019 survey. The percentage of computer users affected with pain in the neck, pain in the back, and eye strain was higher than other CTD areas in both the surveys. The duration of computer use did not show a significant correlation to the presence of CTDs among computer users in both surveys.","PeriodicalId":75019,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of occupational therapy","volume":"37 1","pages":"50 - 55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of occupational therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoth.ijoth_6_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digitalization has resulted in increased computer use. Computer use involves repetitive movements and relatively static posture of neck, limbs, and trunk, contributing in cumulative trauma disorders (CTDs). Over a decade, ergonomic awareness has increased, but CTDs have prevailed. Objective: A comparison of 2009 versus 2019 surveys was done to understand CTD trends and to find the significance of the number of people affected due to hours per day computer use. Study Design: A comparison of two surveys was conducted to research trend in occurrences of CTDs. Methods: The sampling was done using the snowball method. Both surveys had identical research methodology and collected data of (n) 100 computer users of India with an age range of 20–50 years, i.e., total of N = 200 in combined surveys. Participants filled in the self-explanatory questionnaire on Google Forms that assessed areas of CTD pain, severity of pain, and functional performance during pain. Results: Data analysis showed a higher percentage of pain in the neck, eye strain, and back pain in computer users in both 2009 and 2019 surveys. There was an overall decrease in the percentage of computer users affected with CTDs from 86% to 70%, but anatomically, an increase in percentages of pain in the upper limb, headaches, and lower-back pain was reported in 2019. The relation between duration of computer use and number of computer users affected was found to be nonsignificant for both 2009 and 2019 surveys (χ[2] = 3.5408; P = 1.7027 and χ[2] = 1.3739; P = 0.5031, respectively, 95% confidence interval [CI] [4.605, 7.378]). Spearman's correlation showed no significant correlation between duration of computer use and severity of pain in both 2009 (r = 0.078; P = 0.443, 95% CI [−0.120, 0.270]) and 2019 (r = −0.085; P = 0.398, 95% CI [−0.277, 0.114]). Conclusion: The comparison of 2009 and 2019 surveys showed an overall decrease in the percentage of computer users affected with CTDs in the 2019 survey. An increase in upper-limb pain, headache, and lower-back ache percentages was noted, while upper-back pain, neck pain, and eye strain percentage showed a decreasing trend in the 2019 survey. The percentage of computer users affected with pain in the neck, pain in the back, and eye strain was higher than other CTD areas in both the surveys. The duration of computer use did not show a significant correlation to the presence of CTDs among computer users in both surveys.
印度计算机用户累积性创伤障碍的趋势:2009年与2019年调查的比较
背景:数字化导致了计算机使用的增加。使用电脑涉及颈部、四肢和躯干的重复运动和相对静止的姿势,导致累积性创伤障碍(CTDs)。十多年来,人们对人体工程学的认识有所提高,但CTDs仍然盛行。目的:对2009年和2019年的调查进行比较,以了解CTD趋势,并发现由于每天使用电脑的时间而受影响的人数的重要性。研究设计:对两项调查进行比较,研究CTDs的发生趋势。方法:采用滚雪球法取样。两项调查采用相同的研究方法,收集了(n) 100名年龄在20-50岁之间的印度计算机用户的数据,即合并调查共n = 200人。参与者在谷歌表格上填写自我解释的问卷,评估CTD疼痛的区域、疼痛的严重程度和疼痛期间的功能表现。结果:数据分析显示,在2009年和2019年的调查中,电脑用户的颈部疼痛、眼睛疲劳和背部疼痛的比例更高。受CTDs影响的计算机用户比例总体上从86%下降到70%,但从解剖学角度来看,2019年上肢疼痛、头痛和下背部疼痛的比例有所增加。在2009年和2019年的调查中,计算机使用时间与受影响的计算机用户数量之间的关系均不显著(χ[2] = 3.5408;P = 1.7027, χ[2] = 1.3739;P = 0.5031, 95%可信区间[CI][4.605, 7.378])。Spearman相关分析显示,2009年使用电脑时间与疼痛严重程度无显著相关(r = 0.078;P = 0.443, 95% CI[- 0.120, 0.270])和2019年(r = - 0.085;P = 0.398, 95% ci[- 0.277, 0.114])。结论:2009年和2019年调查的比较显示,2019年调查中受CTDs影响的计算机用户百分比总体下降。在2019年的调查中,上肢疼痛、头痛和下背部疼痛的比例有所增加,而上背部疼痛、颈部疼痛和眼睛疲劳的比例呈下降趋势。在这两项调查中,受颈部疼痛、背部疼痛和眼睛疲劳影响的电脑用户比例都高于其他CTD区域。在这两项调查中,电脑使用的持续时间与电脑用户中CTDs的存在没有显着的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书