Comparing the rate of applying Knowledge Management in Guidance Schools of Education Districts 1 and 4 in Tabriz

Z. Barzegar, S. M. Avarsin
{"title":"Comparing the rate of applying Knowledge Management in Guidance Schools of Education Districts 1 and 4 in Tabriz","authors":"Z. Barzegar, S. M. Avarsin","doi":"10.14196/SJR.V3I8.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to compare the application of Knowledge Management in Education, Tabriz guidance schools districts 1 and 4 was performed. Research methods, descriptive - survey, and the population is 392 people of principals and teachers, using Cochran formula, 86, and 258, respectively, stratified sampling method was chosen. Measuring instruments, Bokoitz and Williams Knowledge Management questionnaire, with a reliability of 0.89 is. For data analysis, Student's t test and Friedman were used, and the results showed that the Tabriz guidance schools districts 1 and 4, the components of knowledge management applications, such as to acquire knowledge, applying knowledge, learn from the knowledge process, sharing and exchanging knowledge, and optimal use of knowledge, there is no significant difference. However, evaluation knowledge, and create and consolidate knowledge, there are significant differences. The components of the optimal use of knowledge, apply knowledge, evaluating knowledge, create and consolidate knowledge, sharing and exchanging knowledge, to acquire knowledge, and learn from the knowledge process, the highest rank in regions 1 and 4, respectively.","PeriodicalId":21707,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Journal of Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"890-897"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Journal of Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14196/SJR.V3I8.1586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the application of Knowledge Management in Education, Tabriz guidance schools districts 1 and 4 was performed. Research methods, descriptive - survey, and the population is 392 people of principals and teachers, using Cochran formula, 86, and 258, respectively, stratified sampling method was chosen. Measuring instruments, Bokoitz and Williams Knowledge Management questionnaire, with a reliability of 0.89 is. For data analysis, Student's t test and Friedman were used, and the results showed that the Tabriz guidance schools districts 1 and 4, the components of knowledge management applications, such as to acquire knowledge, applying knowledge, learn from the knowledge process, sharing and exchanging knowledge, and optimal use of knowledge, there is no significant difference. However, evaluation knowledge, and create and consolidate knowledge, there are significant differences. The components of the optimal use of knowledge, apply knowledge, evaluating knowledge, create and consolidate knowledge, sharing and exchanging knowledge, to acquire knowledge, and learn from the knowledge process, the highest rank in regions 1 and 4, respectively.
比较大不里士市第一教育区和第四教育区辅导学校应用知识管理的比率
本研究以大不里士一区与四区学校为研究对象,比较知识管理在教育中的应用。研究方法,采用描述性调查法,对人口为392人的校长和教师,分别采用科克伦公式86、258,采用分层抽样法。测量工具为Bokoitz and Williams知识管理问卷,信度为0.89。对数据进行分析,采用Student’st检验和Friedman检验,结果显示,大不里士区1区和4区指导学校在知识管理应用的组成部分,如获取知识、应用知识、从知识过程中学习、共享和交换知识、优化利用知识等方面,没有显著差异。但是,评价知识,与创造和巩固知识,有显著的区别。知识的最优利用、应用知识、评价知识、创造和巩固知识、共享和交换知识、获取知识和从知识过程中学习,分别在区域1和4中排名最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信