DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR-TIER DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR MISCONCEPTION OF OSCILLATION AND WAVES

IF 3.3 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
R. Negoro, Viga Karina
{"title":"DEVELOPMENT OF A FOUR-TIER DIAGNOSTIC TEST FOR MISCONCEPTION OF OSCILLATION AND WAVES","authors":"R. Negoro, Viga Karina","doi":"10.21009/1.05201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Difficulty understanding students' concepts needs to be known so that improvements can be made so that eventually students can master the concepts well. Misconception diagnostic tests can be an alternative to uncovering causes or factors of misconception in students. This study aims to develop a Four-Tier Test diagnostic test instrument to diagnose students' misconceptions on vibration and wave material to adapt the Mechanical Waves Conceptual Survey by Thongchai which has content compatibility with the segmentation of Indonesian curriculum material. This research is a development study using 3D development models. The 3D development model consists of 3 stages, namely: 1) Define, 2) Design and 3) Develop. The developed four-tier test diagnostic test instrument consists of 22 multiple-choice questions. The results of the content validation by three experts stated that the instrument was very feasible with an average percentage of 87%. Empirical trial results show as many as 22 valid diagnostic test items have enough to good power a level of difficulty and discrimination power. The reliability of the questions was analyzed using the Kuder Richardson formula of 0.765 with a high category. This instrument can be used to minimize the time spent in the process of identifying misconceptions because it is in the form of multiple-choice with varied questions.","PeriodicalId":31990,"journal":{"name":"JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPPPF Jurnal Penelitian Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Difficulty understanding students' concepts needs to be known so that improvements can be made so that eventually students can master the concepts well. Misconception diagnostic tests can be an alternative to uncovering causes or factors of misconception in students. This study aims to develop a Four-Tier Test diagnostic test instrument to diagnose students' misconceptions on vibration and wave material to adapt the Mechanical Waves Conceptual Survey by Thongchai which has content compatibility with the segmentation of Indonesian curriculum material. This research is a development study using 3D development models. The 3D development model consists of 3 stages, namely: 1) Define, 2) Design and 3) Develop. The developed four-tier test diagnostic test instrument consists of 22 multiple-choice questions. The results of the content validation by three experts stated that the instrument was very feasible with an average percentage of 87%. Empirical trial results show as many as 22 valid diagnostic test items have enough to good power a level of difficulty and discrimination power. The reliability of the questions was analyzed using the Kuder Richardson formula of 0.765 with a high category. This instrument can be used to minimize the time spent in the process of identifying misconceptions because it is in the form of multiple-choice with varied questions.
对振荡和波动的误解的四层诊断测试的发展
理解学生概念的难度需要知道,这样才能进行改进,最终使学生能够很好地掌握概念。误解诊断测试可以是发现学生误解的原因或因素的另一种选择。本研究旨在开发一套四层测试诊断测试工具,以诊断学生对振动和波浪材料的误解,以适应通柴的机械波概念调查,该调查内容与印度尼西亚课程材料的分割相兼容。本研究是一个使用3D开发模型的开发研究。三维开发模型包括3个阶段,即:1)定义,2)设计和3)开发。开发的四层测试诊断测试仪由22道选择题组成。三位专家的含量验证结果表明,该仪器的平均含量为87%,是非常可行的。实证试验结果表明,多达22个有效诊断测试项目具有足够好的难度和辨别力。采用库德-理查森公式(0.765)分析问题的信度,其中类别较高。这个工具可以用来最大限度地减少在识别错误概念的过程中花费的时间,因为它是以多种问题的选择形式出现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信