A utilização dos recursos eletrotermofototerapêuticos no tratamento da síndrome da fibromialgia: uma revisão sistemática

Natalia Aquorini Ricci, Carolina Náglio Kalil Dias, P. Driusso
{"title":"A utilização dos recursos eletrotermofototerapêuticos no tratamento da síndrome da fibromialgia: uma revisão sistemática","authors":"Natalia Aquorini Ricci, Carolina Náglio Kalil Dias, P. Driusso","doi":"10.1590/S1413-35552010000100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the scientific evidence relating to electrothermal and phototherapeutic methods for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: The search for reports on interventions using electrothermal and phototherapy for FMS was carried out in the Pubmed, Medline, Lilacs, Scielo, ISI Web of Knowledge, PEDro and Cochrane Collaboration databases. Randomized controlled clinical trials published over the past 10 years in English, Portuguese and Spanish were selected. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Jadad scale. The analysis on the study results was done by means of critical review of the content. RESULTS: Seven studies were reviewed in full, and these identified interventions using laser (n=4), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS; n=1), interferential current (IFC) alone (n=1) and IFC combined with ultrasound (US; n=1). Only two studies showed good methodological quality according to the Jadad scale. Most of the studies (n=6) used the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the clinical diagnosis of FMS. Pain was the most frequently evaluated FMS symptom. The intervention methods and their duration varied widely, and there was no mention of the parameters used in the electrothermal and phototherapeutic methods. Pain levels reduced significantly in all of the studies. CONCLUSION: There are still limitations on the generalization of the results, adverse reactions and doses of the FMS treatment. Further studies are needed to establish the effectiveness of electrothermal and phototherapy in treating FMS.","PeriodicalId":21195,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Fisioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552010000100002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To systematically investigate the scientific evidence relating to electrothermal and phototherapeutic methods for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: The search for reports on interventions using electrothermal and phototherapy for FMS was carried out in the Pubmed, Medline, Lilacs, Scielo, ISI Web of Knowledge, PEDro and Cochrane Collaboration databases. Randomized controlled clinical trials published over the past 10 years in English, Portuguese and Spanish were selected. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Jadad scale. The analysis on the study results was done by means of critical review of the content. RESULTS: Seven studies were reviewed in full, and these identified interventions using laser (n=4), transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS; n=1), interferential current (IFC) alone (n=1) and IFC combined with ultrasound (US; n=1). Only two studies showed good methodological quality according to the Jadad scale. Most of the studies (n=6) used the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology for the clinical diagnosis of FMS. Pain was the most frequently evaluated FMS symptom. The intervention methods and their duration varied widely, and there was no mention of the parameters used in the electrothermal and phototherapeutic methods. Pain levels reduced significantly in all of the studies. CONCLUSION: There are still limitations on the generalization of the results, adverse reactions and doses of the FMS treatment. Further studies are needed to establish the effectiveness of electrothermal and phototherapy in treating FMS.
电热光疗资源在纤维肌痛综合征治疗中的应用:系统综述
目的:系统探讨电热与光疗方法治疗纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)的科学依据。方法:在Pubmed, Medline, Lilacs, Scielo, ISI Web of Knowledge, PEDro和Cochrane Collaboration数据库中检索有关FMS使用电热和光疗干预措施的报告。我们选取了过去10年间用英语、葡萄牙语和西班牙语发表的随机对照临床试验。采用Jadad量表评估研究的方法学质量。对研究结果的分析是通过对内容的批判性审查来完成的。结果:对7项研究进行了全面回顾,这些确定的干预措施包括激光(n=4)、经皮神经电刺激(TENS;n=1),干扰电流(IFC)单独(n=1)和IFC联合超声(US;n = 1)。根据Jadad量表,只有两项研究的方法学质量较好。大多数研究(n=6)采用美国风湿病学会的标准进行FMS的临床诊断。疼痛是最常被评估的FMS症状。干预方法和持续时间差异很大,没有提及电热和光疗方法使用的参数。在所有的研究中,疼痛程度都显著降低。结论:FMS治疗的结果推广、不良反应及剂量等方面仍有局限性。电热和光疗治疗FMS的有效性有待进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信