Excess mortality among essential workers in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic

M. Matz, C. Allemani, M. V. van Tongeren, V. Nafilyan, S. Rhodes, K. van Veldhoven, L. Pembrey, M. Coleman, N. Pearce
{"title":"Excess mortality among essential workers in England and Wales during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"M. Matz, C. Allemani, M. V. van Tongeren, V. Nafilyan, S. Rhodes, K. van Veldhoven, L. Pembrey, M. Coleman, N. Pearce","doi":"10.1136/jech-2022-218786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Exposure to SARS-CoV-2, subsequent development of COVID-19 and death from COVID-19 may vary by occupation, and the risks may be higher for those categorised as ‘essential workers’. Methods We estimated excess mortality by occupational group and sex separately for each month in 2020 and for the entire 12 months overall. Results Mortality for all adults of working age was similar to the annual average over the previous 5 years. Monthly excess mortality peaked in April, when the number of deaths was 54.2% higher than expected and was lowest in December when deaths were 30.0% lower than expected. Essential workers had consistently higher excess mortality than other groups throughout 2020. There were also large differences in excess mortality between the categories of essential workers, with healthcare workers having the highest excess mortality and social care and education workers having the lowest. Excess mortality also varied widely between men and women, even within the same occupational group. Generally, excess mortality was higher in men. Conclusions In summary, excess mortality was consistently higher for essential workers throughout 2020, particularly for healthcare workers. Further research is needed to examine excess mortality by occupational group, while controlling for important confounders such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status. For non-essential workers, the lockdowns, encouragement to work from home and to maintain social distancing are likely to have prevented a number of deaths from COVID-19 and from other causes.","PeriodicalId":15778,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"660 - 666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2022-218786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background Exposure to SARS-CoV-2, subsequent development of COVID-19 and death from COVID-19 may vary by occupation, and the risks may be higher for those categorised as ‘essential workers’. Methods We estimated excess mortality by occupational group and sex separately for each month in 2020 and for the entire 12 months overall. Results Mortality for all adults of working age was similar to the annual average over the previous 5 years. Monthly excess mortality peaked in April, when the number of deaths was 54.2% higher than expected and was lowest in December when deaths were 30.0% lower than expected. Essential workers had consistently higher excess mortality than other groups throughout 2020. There were also large differences in excess mortality between the categories of essential workers, with healthcare workers having the highest excess mortality and social care and education workers having the lowest. Excess mortality also varied widely between men and women, even within the same occupational group. Generally, excess mortality was higher in men. Conclusions In summary, excess mortality was consistently higher for essential workers throughout 2020, particularly for healthcare workers. Further research is needed to examine excess mortality by occupational group, while controlling for important confounders such as ethnicity and socioeconomic status. For non-essential workers, the lockdowns, encouragement to work from home and to maintain social distancing are likely to have prevented a number of deaths from COVID-19 and from other causes.
COVID-19大流行期间英格兰和威尔士基本工作人员的死亡率过高
暴露于SARS-CoV-2、随后发展为COVID-19和死于COVID-19可能因职业而异,对于那些被归类为“关键工人”的人来说,风险可能更高。方法按职业组和性别分别估计2020年每个月和整个12个月的超额死亡率。结果所有工作年龄成年人的死亡率与前5年的年平均死亡率相似。月超额死亡率在4月达到峰值,当时死亡人数比预期高54.2%,在12月最低,死亡人数比预期低30.0%。整个2020年,基本工作者的超额死亡率一直高于其他群体。基本工作者类别之间的超额死亡率也存在很大差异,保健工作者的超额死亡率最高,社会护理和教育工作者的超额死亡率最低。男性和女性之间的超额死亡率差别也很大,即使在同一职业群体中也是如此。一般来说,男性的超额死亡率更高。总而言之,2020年基本工作者的超额死亡率持续较高,特别是卫生保健工作者。在控制种族和社会经济地位等重要混杂因素的同时,需要进一步的研究来检查职业群体的超额死亡率。对于非必要的工作人员来说,封锁、鼓励在家工作和保持社交距离可能阻止了一些人死于COVID-19和其他原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信