Personal Protection Equipment and Emergency Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain

C. Y. Benítez, J. Fernando, A. Güemes, J. Aranda, F. Turégano, L. Ponchietti, F. Pareja, V. Duran, J. Blas
{"title":"Personal Protection Equipment and Emergency Surgery during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain","authors":"C. Y. Benítez, J. Fernando, A. Güemes, J. Aranda, F. Turégano, L. Ponchietti, F. Pareja, V. Duran, J. Blas","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ab s t r Ac t Introduction: In December 2019, in Wuhan, China, a new viral disease, COVID-19, was diagnosed, and in January 2020, the first case was diagnosed in Spain. In April, Spain had reported more than 200,000 cases, 38,000 of which were health workers, representing more than 16% of the volume of contagion in the general population. The objective of our study was to determine the availability, characteristics of use, and the need for improvisation of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Materials and methods: An online, anonymous, prospective survey was carried out from April 2 to 15 by an e-mail invitation to 562 of the Trauma and Emergency Surgery sections of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. The survey collected demographic data, the region of clinical practice, patterns of PPE use in emergency surgeries, and the improvisation of equipment. Results: Total 58 health workers from 12 communities completed the survey, 95% surgeons. Total 28% received training with PPE during the pandemic, and 44% rated it as insufficient. The PPE used in surgery were double glove (74%), face shield (72%), surgical glasses (67%), waterproof gown (67%), and boot covers (32%). Lack of N95/FPP2/3 was reported by 82% and other elements of PPE by 68%. More than half of the respondents (51%) improvised PPE. Conclusion: The results reflect a low degree of training on PPE use before and during the first wave of the pandemic, the lack of PPE, especially masks, and the need to use nonapproved material as a protection mechanism.","PeriodicalId":74395,"journal":{"name":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Panamerican journal of trauma, critical care & emergency surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10030-1292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ab s t r Ac t Introduction: In December 2019, in Wuhan, China, a new viral disease, COVID-19, was diagnosed, and in January 2020, the first case was diagnosed in Spain. In April, Spain had reported more than 200,000 cases, 38,000 of which were health workers, representing more than 16% of the volume of contagion in the general population. The objective of our study was to determine the availability, characteristics of use, and the need for improvisation of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain. Materials and methods: An online, anonymous, prospective survey was carried out from April 2 to 15 by an e-mail invitation to 562 of the Trauma and Emergency Surgery sections of the Spanish Association of Surgeons. The survey collected demographic data, the region of clinical practice, patterns of PPE use in emergency surgeries, and the improvisation of equipment. Results: Total 58 health workers from 12 communities completed the survey, 95% surgeons. Total 28% received training with PPE during the pandemic, and 44% rated it as insufficient. The PPE used in surgery were double glove (74%), face shield (72%), surgical glasses (67%), waterproof gown (67%), and boot covers (32%). Lack of N95/FPP2/3 was reported by 82% and other elements of PPE by 68%. More than half of the respondents (51%) improvised PPE. Conclusion: The results reflect a low degree of training on PPE use before and during the first wave of the pandemic, the lack of PPE, especially masks, and the need to use nonapproved material as a protection mechanism.
西班牙COVID-19大流行期间的个人防护装备和紧急手术
导语:2019年12月,中国武汉确诊了一种新型病毒性疾病COVID-19, 2020年1月,西班牙确诊了首例病例。4月,西班牙报告了20多万例病例,其中3.8万例是卫生工作者,占总人口感染人数的16%以上。本研究的目的是确定西班牙第一波COVID-19大流行期间个人防护装备(PPE)的可用性、使用特点和应急需求。材料和方法:4月2日至15日,通过电子邮件邀请西班牙外科医生协会创伤和急诊外科分会的562名成员进行了一项在线、匿名、前瞻性调查。调查收集了人口统计数据、临床实践区域、急诊手术中个人防护装备的使用模式以及设备的临时使用。结果:共有来自12个社区的58名卫生工作者完成了调查,其中95%为外科医生。28%的人在大流行期间接受了个人防护装备培训,44%的人认为培训不足。手术中使用的个人防护装备为双手套(74%)、面罩(72%)、手术眼镜(67%)、防水服(67%)和靴套(32%)。82%报告缺乏N95/FPP2/3, 68%报告缺乏PPE的其他成分。一半以上的答复者(51%)临时使用个人防护装备。结论:调查结果反映了疫情前和第一波期间对个人防护装备使用的培训程度较低,缺乏个人防护装备,尤其是口罩,需要使用未经批准的材料作为防护机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信