Performance Evaluation of Two System Models for a MIMO System to Hover the Bicopter Unmanned Aerial Vehicle

J. Prakosa, S. Agmal, E. Kurniawan, M. J. Kholili, Chifayah Astuti
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Two System Models for a MIMO System to Hover the Bicopter Unmanned Aerial Vehicle","authors":"J. Prakosa, S. Agmal, E. Kurniawan, M. J. Kholili, Chifayah Astuti","doi":"10.15294/jte.v14i1.35746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) control system models are highly challenging due to multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMO). Not only does it have various angular position outputs such as roll, yaw, and pitch, but also flight control has more than one input; for instance, a bicopter has dual rotors. More rotors have more complex model. The hover condition has a zero resultant force which can be utilized to design a system model. On the other hand, an attractive identification system method is applied to develop the design. This research aims to evaluate the performance of two MIMO design on bicopter between methods based on the hover principle and identification technique. Experimental validation by employing bicopter simulator is an excellent strategy to fulfil this purpose. The results of the investigation of the experiment showed that the identification model was more accurate than the hover design, particularly regarding the overshot phenomenon and error. In addition, the hover principle tended to build ideal model because it did not include the dynamic, uncertainty and nonlinear conditions in aeroplane control design.  Although the identification system was complicated because it previously needed to measure the input and output values, it performed closer to the actual experiment. It performed more satisfactory overshoot values compared with the experimental validation than the hover model by 1°, 3°, and 8° in roll, pitch, and yaw angles, respectively.","PeriodicalId":33631,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknik Elektro","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknik Elektro","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jte.v14i1.35746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) control system models are highly challenging due to multiple inputs and multiple outputs (MIMO). Not only does it have various angular position outputs such as roll, yaw, and pitch, but also flight control has more than one input; for instance, a bicopter has dual rotors. More rotors have more complex model. The hover condition has a zero resultant force which can be utilized to design a system model. On the other hand, an attractive identification system method is applied to develop the design. This research aims to evaluate the performance of two MIMO design on bicopter between methods based on the hover principle and identification technique. Experimental validation by employing bicopter simulator is an excellent strategy to fulfil this purpose. The results of the investigation of the experiment showed that the identification model was more accurate than the hover design, particularly regarding the overshot phenomenon and error. In addition, the hover principle tended to build ideal model because it did not include the dynamic, uncertainty and nonlinear conditions in aeroplane control design.  Although the identification system was complicated because it previously needed to measure the input and output values, it performed closer to the actual experiment. It performed more satisfactory overshoot values compared with the experimental validation than the hover model by 1°, 3°, and 8° in roll, pitch, and yaw angles, respectively.
多输入多输出(MIMO)悬停系统两种系统模型的性能评价
由于多输入多输出(MIMO),构建无人机(UAV)控制系统模型极具挑战性。它不仅有各种角度位置输出,如滚转、偏航和俯仰,而且飞行控制有多个输入;例如,一架直升飞机有双旋翼。转子越多,模型越复杂。悬停状态的合力为零,可以用来设计系统模型。另一方面,采用了一种吸引人的识别系统方法来进行设计。本研究旨在比较基于悬停原理和辨识技术的两种多输入多输出设计方法在直升机上的性能。利用直升机模拟器进行实验验证是实现这一目标的一个很好的策略。实验研究结果表明,该识别模型比悬停设计更准确,特别是在超冲现象和误差方面。此外,悬停原理由于不考虑飞机控制设计中的动态性、不确定性和非线性条件,因而容易建立理想模型。虽然识别系统由于之前需要测量输入和输出值而变得复杂,但它的表现更接近实际实验。与实验验证相比,该模型的滚转角、俯仰角和偏航角分别比悬停模型高1°、3°和8°,超调值更令人满意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书