The Buddha's Shadow and God's Flesh: Image and Anti-Image in Huiyuan and Julian of Norwich

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 LITERATURE
Yun Ni
{"title":"The Buddha's Shadow and God's Flesh: Image and Anti-Image in Huiyuan and Julian of Norwich","authors":"Yun Ni","doi":"10.1353/rel.2022.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:This essay compares the ideology of visualization of the late fourth-century Chinese Buddhist monk Huiyuan 慧遠 (334–417) and the late fourteenth-century English Christian mystic Julian of Norwich (1342–1430). Specifically, it compares how the two authors deal with the limits and possibilities of visualization in understanding the relationship between the transcendent and the immanent. Although Huiyuan and Julian lived a thousand years apart, their articulations of the imagistic representation of the transcendent reveal synchronic connections between Buddhist and Christian ideas about the absolute presence and necessary absence of the divine. Both religious thinkers use details related to the skin and to textiles when they address the representation of the \"ineffable.\" The ways they treat the boundaries between skin and textiles expose fundamental differences between the Trinity of the Christian God and the Buddha's three bodies (the Trikāya), but the two religious writers reflect on a similar oscillation between the active generation and passive reception of mental images.","PeriodicalId":43443,"journal":{"name":"RELIGION & LITERATURE","volume":"1 1","pages":"27 - 47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RELIGION & LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/rel.2022.0001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:This essay compares the ideology of visualization of the late fourth-century Chinese Buddhist monk Huiyuan 慧遠 (334–417) and the late fourteenth-century English Christian mystic Julian of Norwich (1342–1430). Specifically, it compares how the two authors deal with the limits and possibilities of visualization in understanding the relationship between the transcendent and the immanent. Although Huiyuan and Julian lived a thousand years apart, their articulations of the imagistic representation of the transcendent reveal synchronic connections between Buddhist and Christian ideas about the absolute presence and necessary absence of the divine. Both religious thinkers use details related to the skin and to textiles when they address the representation of the "ineffable." The ways they treat the boundaries between skin and textiles expose fundamental differences between the Trinity of the Christian God and the Buddha's three bodies (the Trikāya), but the two religious writers reflect on a similar oscillation between the active generation and passive reception of mental images.
佛影与神肉:汇源与诺里奇朱利安的形象与反形象
摘要:本文比较了4世纪晚期中国佛教高僧汇源(334-417)和14世纪晚期英国基督教神秘主义者诺里奇的朱利安(1342-1430)的形象化思想。具体而言,它比较了两位作者在理解超越与内在之间的关系时如何处理可视化的局限性和可能性。虽然汇源和朱利安相隔一千年,但他们对超验的意象表现的阐述揭示了佛教和基督教关于神的绝对存在和必要缺席的观念之间的共时性联系。两位宗教思想家在谈到“不可言喻”的表现时,都使用了与皮肤和纺织品有关的细节。他们对待皮肤和纺织品之间界限的方式暴露了基督教三位一体的上帝和佛陀的三个身体之间的根本差异(Trikāya),但这两位宗教作家反映了类似的心理图像的主动产生和被动接受之间的振荡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信