Aspetti della fine della cultura Palafitticolo-Terramaricola (completo)

P. Frontini
{"title":"Aspetti della fine della cultura Palafitticolo-Terramaricola (completo)","authors":"P. Frontini","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/2349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims at reconstructing some aspects of the crisis which lead to the collapse of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture at the end of the Recent Bronze Age. The area delimited by the rivers Serio, Po and Adige and by the hills to the North is taken into account. The chronological sequence presented is based on the stratigraphic series recorded both to the North and to the South of the river Po. With regard to the end of the Middle Bronze Age and the Recent Bronze Age the following phases have been distinguished: Middle Bronze Age 3A (BM 3A); Middle Bronze Age 3B (BM 3B); Recent Bronze Age 1 (BR 1); Recent Bronze Age 2 (BR 2); Recent Bronze Age 3 (BR 3). The dating contexts of each phase have been quoted (chapter 1). The typology includes pottery types which can be used as chronological and/or cultural indicators (chapter 2). On the basis of the geographical distribution of the pottery types, three cultural groups have been distinguished. The northern one, occupying the southern hills in the Brescia district, is characterized by a conservative pottery style during the BM 3 and the BR. Pottery types widespread in the Subappennine are rare till the end of the BR 1. The western and the eastern group are located in the plain, both of them in contact with the peninsular regions. Pottery types show main cultural links, on the one hand, between the western group and the Emilia region to the West of the river Panaro, on the other hand between the eastern group and eastern Emilia and Romagna (chapter 3). The study of the settlements dating from the BM 3 to the end of the BR (chapter 4), the changing in the settlement pattern during this period and the number of abandoned villages in each phase indicate the intensity of the crisis in the three cultural districts (chapter 5) and show that the disappearance of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture was the consequence of a gradual process. The crisis affected mainly the plain, especially the western district and it is likely that some groups moved from here to the northern one from the BR 2 on. The eastern group, confined to the East of the river Tartaro during the BR 1, seems to have enlarged its territory in the BR 2, including the area delimited by the rivers Tartaro and Mincio, which earlier belonged to the western group. Some eastern settlements – such as Fondo Paviani and perhaps a few others- overcame the crisis and left the tradition of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture to Frattesina, a near site which flourished during the BF. Even in the area under consideration, just like in the area to the South of the Po river, the collapse of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture is the result of many negative factors: climatic-environmental, demographic, social, economical and political ones. A more complex social organization and different environmental characteristics, as some scholars claim, may explain the stability of some settlements in the eastern group, such as Fondo Paviani. The finding of Mycenean and Aegean type pottery is the main archaeological evidence distinguishing them from the other terramara sites. The dramatic decrease in the number of settlements at the end of the BR and at the beginning of the BF in the area under study allow the assumption that part of the population move to the “diaspora”.","PeriodicalId":30393,"journal":{"name":"IpoTESI di Preistoria","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IpoTESI di Preistoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/2349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims at reconstructing some aspects of the crisis which lead to the collapse of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture at the end of the Recent Bronze Age. The area delimited by the rivers Serio, Po and Adige and by the hills to the North is taken into account. The chronological sequence presented is based on the stratigraphic series recorded both to the North and to the South of the river Po. With regard to the end of the Middle Bronze Age and the Recent Bronze Age the following phases have been distinguished: Middle Bronze Age 3A (BM 3A); Middle Bronze Age 3B (BM 3B); Recent Bronze Age 1 (BR 1); Recent Bronze Age 2 (BR 2); Recent Bronze Age 3 (BR 3). The dating contexts of each phase have been quoted (chapter 1). The typology includes pottery types which can be used as chronological and/or cultural indicators (chapter 2). On the basis of the geographical distribution of the pottery types, three cultural groups have been distinguished. The northern one, occupying the southern hills in the Brescia district, is characterized by a conservative pottery style during the BM 3 and the BR. Pottery types widespread in the Subappennine are rare till the end of the BR 1. The western and the eastern group are located in the plain, both of them in contact with the peninsular regions. Pottery types show main cultural links, on the one hand, between the western group and the Emilia region to the West of the river Panaro, on the other hand between the eastern group and eastern Emilia and Romagna (chapter 3). The study of the settlements dating from the BM 3 to the end of the BR (chapter 4), the changing in the settlement pattern during this period and the number of abandoned villages in each phase indicate the intensity of the crisis in the three cultural districts (chapter 5) and show that the disappearance of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture was the consequence of a gradual process. The crisis affected mainly the plain, especially the western district and it is likely that some groups moved from here to the northern one from the BR 2 on. The eastern group, confined to the East of the river Tartaro during the BR 1, seems to have enlarged its territory in the BR 2, including the area delimited by the rivers Tartaro and Mincio, which earlier belonged to the western group. Some eastern settlements – such as Fondo Paviani and perhaps a few others- overcame the crisis and left the tradition of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture to Frattesina, a near site which flourished during the BF. Even in the area under consideration, just like in the area to the South of the Po river, the collapse of the palafitticolo-terramaricola culture is the result of many negative factors: climatic-environmental, demographic, social, economical and political ones. A more complex social organization and different environmental characteristics, as some scholars claim, may explain the stability of some settlements in the eastern group, such as Fondo Paviani. The finding of Mycenean and Aegean type pottery is the main archaeological evidence distinguishing them from the other terramara sites. The dramatic decrease in the number of settlements at the end of the BR and at the beginning of the BF in the area under study allow the assumption that part of the population move to the “diaspora”.
(完整)
该研究旨在重建导致近青铜器时代末期palafitticolo-terramaricola文化崩溃的危机的某些方面。由塞里奥河、波河和阿迪热河以及北部的丘陵所划分的区域被考虑在内。本文给出的年代顺序是根据波河北部和南部的地层序列记录的。关于中青铜器时代和最近青铜器时代的结束,可以区分出以下阶段:中青铜器时代3A (BM 3A);青铜时代中期3B (BM 3B);近青铜时代1 (br1);近代青铜时代2 (br2);最近的青铜时代3 (BR 3)。每个阶段的年代背景已被引用(第1章)。类型学包括陶器类型,可以用作时间和/或文化指标(第2章)。根据陶器类型的地理分布,可以区分出三个文化群体。北部位于布雷西亚地区的南部山丘上,以BM 3和BR时期的保守陶器风格为特征。陶器类型广泛分布在亚亚平宁是罕见的,直到BR 1结束。西部和东部群位于平原上,都与半岛地区有联系。陶器类型显示了主要的文化联系,一方面,西部群体与帕纳罗河以西的艾米利亚地区之间,另一方面,东部群体与东艾米利亚和罗马涅之间(第3章)。从公元前3世纪到公元前4世纪末期的定居点研究(第4章),这一时期聚落格局的变化和每个阶段被遗弃村庄的数量表明了三个文化区危机的强度(第5章),并表明palafitticolo-terramaricola文化的消失是一个渐进过程的结果。这场危机主要影响了平原地区,尤其是西部地区,一些团体很可能从这里从br2转移到北部地区。东部地区在第1代被限制在塔尔塔罗河以东,在第2代似乎扩大了其领土,包括塔尔塔罗河和明西奥河所划分的地区,这些地区以前属于西部地区。一些东部定居点,如Fondo Paviani和其他一些定居点,克服了危机,将palafitticolo-terramaricola文化的传统遗留给了Frattesina,这是一个在BF期间蓬勃发展的附近地区。即使在考虑的地区,就像在波河以南地区一样,palafitticolo-terramaricola文化的崩溃是许多负面因素的结果:气候-环境,人口,社会,经济和政治因素。一些学者声称,更为复杂的社会组织和不同的环境特征可能解释了东部群体的一些定居点的稳定性,例如Fondo Paviani。迈锡尼和爱琴海类型陶器的发现是区分它们与其他土马拉遗址的主要考古证据。研究地区在边界隔离结束时和边界隔离开始时住区数量急剧减少,因此可以假设部分人口迁移到“散居”地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信