The North Sea legal regime

P.W. Birnie
{"title":"The North Sea legal regime","authors":"P.W. Birnie","doi":"10.1016/0951-8312(91)90004-L","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>If conflicts of uses in, and further degradation of, the marine environment of the North Sea occur by the year 2000 this will not be for want of a framework for the international legal regime. This now exists at the global, regional and sub-regional level. During the past 20 years, in response to the impetus provided by the United Nations Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment held in 1972, not only have longstanding international bodies such as the IMO (International Maritime Organization), the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), the Nordic Council, the Council of Europe and the European Community adopted active programmes for protection of the marine environment which had led to the adoption of treaties, regulations, guidelines and codes of practice, but also many new regional commissions and organizations have been established, to develop the measures concerning specific aspects of the required regime. Thus, the Oslo Commission now deals with measures to control and prevent ocean dumping; the Paris Commission with Land-based Sources of Marine Pollution; the Bonn Agreements with Co-operation in dealing with oil and other spillages. Even NATO has established a Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society (CCMS) to promote environmental protection in its area. What is lacking is any one body that takes an overall view of the situation.</p><p>This paper outlines the regime developed through all these bodies and also examines whether there is a need to develop any new comprehensive body; whether an existing body could be given the lead role, or whether the on-going North Sea Conference, backed by the services of the new Task Force, can fill this role.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100978,"journal":{"name":"Ocean and Shoreline Management","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 177-197"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0951-8312(91)90004-L","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean and Shoreline Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095183129190004L","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

If conflicts of uses in, and further degradation of, the marine environment of the North Sea occur by the year 2000 this will not be for want of a framework for the international legal regime. This now exists at the global, regional and sub-regional level. During the past 20 years, in response to the impetus provided by the United Nations Stockholm Conference on the Human Environment held in 1972, not only have longstanding international bodies such as the IMO (International Maritime Organization), the OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), the Nordic Council, the Council of Europe and the European Community adopted active programmes for protection of the marine environment which had led to the adoption of treaties, regulations, guidelines and codes of practice, but also many new regional commissions and organizations have been established, to develop the measures concerning specific aspects of the required regime. Thus, the Oslo Commission now deals with measures to control and prevent ocean dumping; the Paris Commission with Land-based Sources of Marine Pollution; the Bonn Agreements with Co-operation in dealing with oil and other spillages. Even NATO has established a Committee on the Challenges of Modern Society (CCMS) to promote environmental protection in its area. What is lacking is any one body that takes an overall view of the situation.

This paper outlines the regime developed through all these bodies and also examines whether there is a need to develop any new comprehensive body; whether an existing body could be given the lead role, or whether the on-going North Sea Conference, backed by the services of the new Task Force, can fill this role.

北海的法律制度
如果到2000年北海海洋环境的使用发生冲突和进一步退化,这将不会是因为缺乏国际法律制度的框架。这在全球、区域和分区域各级都存在。在过去20年中,在1972年举行的联合国斯德哥尔摩人类环境会议的推动下,不仅国际海事组织、经济合作与发展组织、北欧理事会、欧洲理事会和欧洲共同体等长期存在的国际机构通过了保护海洋环境的积极方案,从而通过了各项条约,已经设立了条例、准则和业务守则,以及许多新的区域委员会和组织,以制定有关所需制度的具体方面的措施。因此,奥斯陆委员会现在处理控制和防止海洋倾倒的措施;海洋陆源污染巴黎委员会;处理石油和其他泄漏的《波恩合作协定》。甚至北约也成立了一个现代社会挑战委员会(CCMS)来促进其所在地区的环境保护。现在缺乏的是一个能全面看待局势的机构。本文概述了通过所有这些机构制定的制度,并审查了是否需要制定任何新的综合性机构;现有的机构是否可以发挥主导作用,或者正在进行的北海会议是否可以在新工作组的服务支持下发挥这一作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信