How to Problematize the Global?

Q4 Social Sciences
Antonia Witt, Felix Anderl, Amitav Acharya, Deepshikha Shahi, Isaac Kamola, S. Cornelissen
{"title":"How to Problematize the Global?","authors":"Antonia Witt, Felix Anderl, Amitav Acharya, Deepshikha Shahi, Isaac Kamola, S. Cornelissen","doi":"10.1177/03058298221139330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International Relations (IR) has long been criticized for taking a particular (Western) experience as basis for formulating theories with claim to universal validity. In response, recent discussions have therefore centered on making IR ‘truly global’, that is, more inclusive and less parochial in its language and substance. But the concept of the global underpinning this discussion is both illusive and strongly contested. It requires problematization. But how? In this Forum, scholars discuss this question with a forward-looking agenda. Building on recent critical engagements with the question of the global as a concept in general and Global IR specifically, the authors ask how the global should be problematized in order to achieve a (more) progressive agenda for IR. They draw on different regional and disciplinary perspectives to both further the agenda of a less exclusive and racist discipline without falling into the trap of shallow inclusivity, and to discuss ways of problematizing the global without falling back into nativism or nationalism.","PeriodicalId":36600,"journal":{"name":"Millennium DIPr","volume":"1 1","pages":"33 - 80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium DIPr","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298221139330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

International Relations (IR) has long been criticized for taking a particular (Western) experience as basis for formulating theories with claim to universal validity. In response, recent discussions have therefore centered on making IR ‘truly global’, that is, more inclusive and less parochial in its language and substance. But the concept of the global underpinning this discussion is both illusive and strongly contested. It requires problematization. But how? In this Forum, scholars discuss this question with a forward-looking agenda. Building on recent critical engagements with the question of the global as a concept in general and Global IR specifically, the authors ask how the global should be problematized in order to achieve a (more) progressive agenda for IR. They draw on different regional and disciplinary perspectives to both further the agenda of a less exclusive and racist discipline without falling into the trap of shallow inclusivity, and to discuss ways of problematizing the global without falling back into nativism or nationalism.
如何将全球问题化?
长期以来,国际关系(IR)一直被批评以特定的(西方)经验为基础,制定声称具有普遍有效性的理论。因此,最近的讨论集中在使国际关系“真正全球化”上,也就是说,在语言和内容上更具包容性,而不是狭隘性。但支撑这一讨论的全球概念既是虚幻的,也是备受争议的。它需要问题化。但如何?在本次论坛上,学者们以前瞻性的议程来讨论这个问题。基于最近对全球作为一个一般概念和全球国际关系具体问题的批判性讨论,作者提出了如何将全球问题化以实现(更)进步的国际关系议程的问题。他们利用不同的区域和学科视角,既进一步推进不那么排他性和种族主义学科的议程,又不会陷入肤浅包容性的陷阱,并讨论在不陷入本土主义或民族主义的情况下将全球问题化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Millennium DIPr
Millennium DIPr Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
1 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信