Contested Fracking Environments: What's the Stories?

P. Jones, D. Comfort
{"title":"Contested Fracking Environments: What's the Stories?","authors":"P. Jones, D. Comfort","doi":"10.36959/742/210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Within the UK several areas have the potential to produce shale gas by fracking but the environments of proposed shale gas development within the UK are strongly contested. .On the one hand, there are political and corporate claims that the commercial development of shale gas could play an important role in the UK’s future energy mix, reduce dependency on foreign sources of energy and stimulate investment in new jobs and businesses. On the other hand, many groups have been campaigning to oppose shale gas development, believing it to have potentially damaging environmental and human consequences. With these two sets of contrasting perspectives on shale gas development by fracking in mind, the aims of this paper are twofold. Firstly, to explore how contrasting positions on fracking are reflected in the stories posted on the Internet by Cuadrilla Resources, one of the principal shale gas companies in the UK, and Frack Off, a grass roots direct action campaign which aims to stop the extraction of shale gas resources. Secondly, to offer some reflections on the role of storytelling in current fracking controversies and, in so doing, to explore some of the wider issues in the debates and conflicts about shale gas development by fracking.","PeriodicalId":7252,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Environmental Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Environmental Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/742/210","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Within the UK several areas have the potential to produce shale gas by fracking but the environments of proposed shale gas development within the UK are strongly contested. .On the one hand, there are political and corporate claims that the commercial development of shale gas could play an important role in the UK’s future energy mix, reduce dependency on foreign sources of energy and stimulate investment in new jobs and businesses. On the other hand, many groups have been campaigning to oppose shale gas development, believing it to have potentially damaging environmental and human consequences. With these two sets of contrasting perspectives on shale gas development by fracking in mind, the aims of this paper are twofold. Firstly, to explore how contrasting positions on fracking are reflected in the stories posted on the Internet by Cuadrilla Resources, one of the principal shale gas companies in the UK, and Frack Off, a grass roots direct action campaign which aims to stop the extraction of shale gas resources. Secondly, to offer some reflections on the role of storytelling in current fracking controversies and, in so doing, to explore some of the wider issues in the debates and conflicts about shale gas development by fracking.
有争议的水力压裂环境:故事是什么?
在英国,有几个地区有潜力通过水力压裂法生产页岩气,但在英国境内拟议的页岩气开发环境受到强烈质疑。一方面,有政治和企业声称,页岩气的商业开发可以在英国未来的能源结构中发挥重要作用,减少对外国能源的依赖,并刺激新的就业机会和商业投资。另一方面,许多团体一直在反对页岩气的开发,认为它可能会对环境和人类造成破坏。考虑到这两种截然不同的页岩气压裂开发观点,本文的目的是双重的。首先,探讨英国主要页岩气公司之一的Cuadrilla Resources和旨在阻止页岩气资源开采的草根直接行动运动Frack Off在互联网上发布的故事中,对水力压裂的不同立场是如何反映出来的。其次,对目前的水力压裂争议中讲故事的作用提出一些反思,并在此过程中探讨有关水力压裂开采页岩气的辩论和冲突中的一些更广泛的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信