ECDSA Passive Attacks, Leakage Sources, and Common Design Mistakes

Jeremy Dubeuf, D. Hély, V. Beroulle
{"title":"ECDSA Passive Attacks, Leakage Sources, and Common Design Mistakes","authors":"Jeremy Dubeuf, D. Hély, V. Beroulle","doi":"10.1145/2820611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Elliptic Curves Cryptography (ECC) tends to replace RSA for public key cryptographic services. ECC is involved in many secure schemes such as Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) key agreement, Elliptic Curve Integrated Encryption Scheme (ECIES), and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). As for every cryptosystem, implementation of such schemes may jeopardize the inherent security provided by the mathematical properties of the ECC. Unfortunate implementation or algorithm choices may create serious vulnerabilities. The elliptic curve scalar operation is particularly sensitive among these schemes. This article surveys passive attacks against well-spread elliptic curve scalar multiplication algorithms highlighting leakage sources and common mistakes that can be used to attack the ECDSA scheme. Experimental results are provided to illustrate and demonstrate the effectiveness of each vulnerability. Finally, the article describes the link between partial leakage and lattice attack in order to understand and demonstrate the impact of small leakages on the security of ECDSA. An example of side channel and lattice attack combination on NIST P-256 is provided in the case where the elliptic curve scalar multiplication is not protected against DPA/CPA and a controllable device is not accessible.","PeriodicalId":7063,"journal":{"name":"ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst.","volume":"27 1","pages":"31:1-31:24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2820611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Elliptic Curves Cryptography (ECC) tends to replace RSA for public key cryptographic services. ECC is involved in many secure schemes such as Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman (ECDH) key agreement, Elliptic Curve Integrated Encryption Scheme (ECIES), and Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm (ECDSA). As for every cryptosystem, implementation of such schemes may jeopardize the inherent security provided by the mathematical properties of the ECC. Unfortunate implementation or algorithm choices may create serious vulnerabilities. The elliptic curve scalar operation is particularly sensitive among these schemes. This article surveys passive attacks against well-spread elliptic curve scalar multiplication algorithms highlighting leakage sources and common mistakes that can be used to attack the ECDSA scheme. Experimental results are provided to illustrate and demonstrate the effectiveness of each vulnerability. Finally, the article describes the link between partial leakage and lattice attack in order to understand and demonstrate the impact of small leakages on the security of ECDSA. An example of side channel and lattice attack combination on NIST P-256 is provided in the case where the elliptic curve scalar multiplication is not protected against DPA/CPA and a controllable device is not accessible.
ECDSA被动攻击、泄漏源和常见设计错误
椭圆曲线密码术(Elliptic Curves Cryptography, ECC)正逐渐取代RSA成为公钥加密服务的主流。ECC涉及到许多安全方案,如椭圆曲线Diffie-Hellman (ECDH)密钥协议、椭圆曲线集成加密方案(ECIES)、椭圆曲线数字签名算法(ECDSA)等。对于每一个密码系统来说,这样的方案的实现可能会危及ECC的数学特性所提供的固有安全性。不幸的实现或算法选择可能会产生严重的漏洞。其中椭圆曲线标量运算尤为敏感。本文研究了针对扩散良好的椭圆曲线标量乘法算法的被动攻击,重点介绍了可用于攻击ECDSA方案的泄漏源和常见错误。实验结果说明和证明了每个漏洞的有效性。最后,本文描述了部分泄漏和晶格攻击之间的联系,以了解和演示小泄漏对ECDSA安全性的影响。在椭圆曲线标量乘法不受DPA/CPA保护且无法访问可控器件的情况下,在NIST P-256上提供了侧信道和晶格攻击组合的示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信