European mobile markets and the doctrine of “4 networks good, 3 networks bad”

P. Curwen, J. Whalley
{"title":"European mobile markets and the doctrine of “4 networks good, 3 networks bad”","authors":"P. Curwen, J. Whalley","doi":"10.1108/INFO-05-2016-0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nIn light of the recent European Commission decisions that clearly favour the maintenance of a four-network structure in European mobile markets, the purpose is to provide an empirical examination of the case for and against such a structure. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nA table of concentration ratios in 35 sample European markets is constructed and is followed by a detailed analysis of all relevant merger/takeover cases since 2012. These are then used to provide a general analysis of the desirability of further consolidation in the European mobile sector. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nAlthough the relevant investigatory bodies claim to have made out a watertight case for the maintenance of existing structures, the paper explains why these claims should be met with some scepticism, especially in light of the development of “quad-play” in all markets. \n \n \n \n \nResearch limitations/implications \n \n \n \n \nWhen a decision is made on a market structure, it is pointless to pursue the “but what if?” alternatives any further. However, it should be possible in a few years’ time to assess whether the Commission’s predictions have come to pass. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nAs the UK decision has only just been delivered, the only commentary so far has had a narrow focus, whereas this paper seeks to provide useful and relevant background data about the structure of markets and technological developments.","PeriodicalId":88488,"journal":{"name":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fruhneuzeit-Info","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/INFO-05-2016-0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose In light of the recent European Commission decisions that clearly favour the maintenance of a four-network structure in European mobile markets, the purpose is to provide an empirical examination of the case for and against such a structure. Design/methodology/approach A table of concentration ratios in 35 sample European markets is constructed and is followed by a detailed analysis of all relevant merger/takeover cases since 2012. These are then used to provide a general analysis of the desirability of further consolidation in the European mobile sector. Findings Although the relevant investigatory bodies claim to have made out a watertight case for the maintenance of existing structures, the paper explains why these claims should be met with some scepticism, especially in light of the development of “quad-play” in all markets. Research limitations/implications When a decision is made on a market structure, it is pointless to pursue the “but what if?” alternatives any further. However, it should be possible in a few years’ time to assess whether the Commission’s predictions have come to pass. Originality/value As the UK decision has only just been delivered, the only commentary so far has had a narrow focus, whereas this paper seeks to provide useful and relevant background data about the structure of markets and technological developments.
欧洲移动市场和“4个网络好,3个网络坏”的原则
鉴于最近欧盟委员会的决定明确支持在欧洲移动市场中维持四网络结构,目的是对支持和反对这种结构的案例进行实证研究。设计/方法/方法构建了35个样本欧洲市场的集中度表,然后对2012年以来所有相关合并/收购案例进行了详细分析。这些然后被用来提供进一步整合在欧洲移动部门的可取性的一般分析。尽管相关调查机构声称已经为现有结构的维护提出了一个无懈可击的案例,但本文解释了为什么这些说法应该受到一些怀疑,特别是考虑到“四人游戏”在所有市场的发展。研究局限/启示当市场结构做出决定时,追求“但是如果?”是毫无意义的。的选择。然而,在几年的时间里,应该有可能评估欧盟委员会的预测是否已经实现。原创性/价值由于英国的决定才刚刚发布,迄今为止唯一的评论焦点狭窄,而本文旨在提供有关市场结构和技术发展的有用和相关的背景数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信