Dynamics Differences between Minimal Models of Second and First-Order Chemical Self-Replication

Lauren A. Moseley, E. Peacock-López
{"title":"Dynamics Differences between Minimal Models of Second and First-Order Chemical Self-Replication","authors":"Lauren A. Moseley, E. Peacock-López","doi":"10.3390/dynamics3030023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To further explore the origins of Life, we consider three self-replicating chemical models. In general, models of the origin of Life include molecular components that can self-replicate and achieve exponential growth. Therefore, chemical self-replication is an essential chemical property of any model. The simplest self-replication mechanisms use the molecular product as a template for its synthesis. This mechanism is the so-called First-Order self-replication. Its regulatory limitations make it challenging to develop chemical networks, which are essential in the models of the origins of Life. In Second-Order self-replication, the molecular product forms a catalytic dimer capable of synthesis of the principal molecular product. In contrast with a simple template, the dimers show more flexibility in forming complex chemical networks since the chemical activity of the dimers can be activated or inhibited by the molecular components of the network. Here, we consider three minimal models: the First-Order Model (FOM), the Second-Order Model (SOM), and an Extended Second-Order Model (ESOM). We construct and analyze the mechanistic dimensionless ordinary differential equations (ODEs) associated with the models. The numerical integration of the set of ODEs gives us a visualization of these systems’ oscillatory behavior and compares their capacities for sustained autocatalytic behavior. The FOM model displays more complex oscillatory behavior than the ESOM model.","PeriodicalId":80276,"journal":{"name":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dynamics (Pembroke, Ont.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics3030023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To further explore the origins of Life, we consider three self-replicating chemical models. In general, models of the origin of Life include molecular components that can self-replicate and achieve exponential growth. Therefore, chemical self-replication is an essential chemical property of any model. The simplest self-replication mechanisms use the molecular product as a template for its synthesis. This mechanism is the so-called First-Order self-replication. Its regulatory limitations make it challenging to develop chemical networks, which are essential in the models of the origins of Life. In Second-Order self-replication, the molecular product forms a catalytic dimer capable of synthesis of the principal molecular product. In contrast with a simple template, the dimers show more flexibility in forming complex chemical networks since the chemical activity of the dimers can be activated or inhibited by the molecular components of the network. Here, we consider three minimal models: the First-Order Model (FOM), the Second-Order Model (SOM), and an Extended Second-Order Model (ESOM). We construct and analyze the mechanistic dimensionless ordinary differential equations (ODEs) associated with the models. The numerical integration of the set of ODEs gives us a visualization of these systems’ oscillatory behavior and compares their capacities for sustained autocatalytic behavior. The FOM model displays more complex oscillatory behavior than the ESOM model.
二阶和一级化学自复制极小模型的动力学差异
为了进一步探索生命的起源,我们考虑了三种自我复制的化学模型。一般来说,生命起源的模型包括可以自我复制和实现指数增长的分子成分。因此,化学自复制是任何模型的基本化学性质。最简单的自我复制机制使用分子产物作为其合成的模板。这种机制就是所谓的一阶自我复制。它的监管限制使得开发化学网络具有挑战性,而化学网络在生命起源模型中至关重要。在二级自我复制中,分子产物形成催化二聚体,能够合成主分子产物。与简单的模板相比,二聚体在形成复杂的化学网络方面表现出更大的灵活性,因为二聚体的化学活性可以被网络的分子成分激活或抑制。在这里,我们考虑三种最小模型:一阶模型(FOM),二阶模型(SOM)和扩展二阶模型(ESOM)。我们构造并分析了与这些模型相关的机械性无量纲常微分方程。通过对ode集合的数值积分,我们可以直观地看到这些系统的振荡行为,并比较它们持续自催化行为的能力。FOM模型比ESOM模型表现出更复杂的振荡行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信