Observations on the Semantic Trajectory of Pluralism in Scholarly Discourse

IF 0.4 Q1 HISTORY
J. Terrier
{"title":"Observations on the Semantic Trajectory of Pluralism in Scholarly Discourse","authors":"J. Terrier","doi":"10.3167/choc.2018.130106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse.\nIt presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution\non the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline\n(philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it\nreferences the rich German debate and the important French intellectual\ndevelopments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the\nadversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates\non political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism,\nof a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy,\neven by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary\nunity.","PeriodicalId":42746,"journal":{"name":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contributions to the History of Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2018.130106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Th is article off ers a history of pluralism as a term in scholarly discourse. It presents the existing research on the question and off ers a contribution on the basis of an inclusive approach that is not limited to one discipline (philosophy or political science) or to one linguistic area. In particular, it references the rich German debate and the important French intellectual developments. Moreover, it considers not only the proponents but also the adversaries of pluralism. Th ere are two recurring elements in the debates on political pluralism. One is the existence, even among the critics of pluralism, of a recognition of plurality at some level. Th e other is the advocacy, even by authors who strongly emphasize confl ict and dissent, of some necessary unity.
学术话语中多元化的语义轨迹观察
这篇文章讲述了多元主义作为一个学术话语术语的历史。它介绍了关于这个问题的现有研究,并在不局限于一个学科(哲学或政治学)或一个语言领域的包容性方法的基础上做出了贡献。特别是,它引用了丰富的德国辩论和重要的法国智力发展。此外,它不仅考虑了多元主义的支持者,也考虑了反对者。在关于政治多元化的辩论中,有两个反复出现的因素。一个是存在,甚至在多元主义的批评者中,在某种程度上承认多元性。另一个是倡导必要的团结,即使是那些强烈强调冲突和异议的作者也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Contributions to the History of Concepts is no longer published by Brill from 2010.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信