Usefulness of the Berlin Questionnaire for Screening Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hyunju Yang, Sung-Hee Yoo
{"title":"Usefulness of the Berlin Questionnaire for Screening Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea","authors":"Hyunju Yang, Sung-Hee Yoo","doi":"10.13078/jsm.220020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a sleep clinic.Methods: We used a retrospective review of 77 subjects with suspected OSA to conduct a secondary analysis of a previously published sleep study. A total of 77 subjects attended and completed overnight, in-laboratory polysomnography. Subjects completed the standard BQ in the evening just before the sleep study.Results: The mean age of 77 subjects was 49.94±15.78 years, of which 37 (48.1%) were male and 42 (63.7%) were white. Forty-six subjects (59.7%) were diagnosed with OSA through polysomnography. In the analysis of each item of the standard BQ, the sensitivity ranged from 4.6% to 92.5%, and the specificity ranged from 13.3% to 85.7%. For item 8, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 4.6%, 84.9%, 0.3, and 1.1, respectively. The area under the curve values of the standard BQ and after deleting item 8 were 0.634 and 0.751, respectively. When item 8 was deleted and each item on the standard BQ was calculated as one point, the cutoff values representing the highest Yuden index were 3.5 and 4.5.Conclusions: A modified BQ that selects four different questions for each subject, regardless of the number of positive categories in the standard BQ, will provide improved accuracy in screening subjects with a high likelihood of having OSA.","PeriodicalId":90527,"journal":{"name":"Indian journal of sleep medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian journal of sleep medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13078/jsm.220020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the Berlin questionnaire (BQ) as a screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in a sleep clinic.Methods: We used a retrospective review of 77 subjects with suspected OSA to conduct a secondary analysis of a previously published sleep study. A total of 77 subjects attended and completed overnight, in-laboratory polysomnography. Subjects completed the standard BQ in the evening just before the sleep study.Results: The mean age of 77 subjects was 49.94±15.78 years, of which 37 (48.1%) were male and 42 (63.7%) were white. Forty-six subjects (59.7%) were diagnosed with OSA through polysomnography. In the analysis of each item of the standard BQ, the sensitivity ranged from 4.6% to 92.5%, and the specificity ranged from 13.3% to 85.7%. For item 8, the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 4.6%, 84.9%, 0.3, and 1.1, respectively. The area under the curve values of the standard BQ and after deleting item 8 were 0.634 and 0.751, respectively. When item 8 was deleted and each item on the standard BQ was calculated as one point, the cutoff values representing the highest Yuden index were 3.5 and 4.5.Conclusions: A modified BQ that selects four different questions for each subject, regardless of the number of positive categories in the standard BQ, will provide improved accuracy in screening subjects with a high likelihood of having OSA.
柏林问卷对筛查阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的有效性
目的:本研究旨在评估柏林问卷(BQ)在睡眠诊所中作为阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)筛查工具的有效性。方法:我们对77名疑似阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的受试者进行回顾性研究,对先前发表的一项睡眠研究进行二次分析。共有77名受试者参加并完成了夜间实验室多导睡眠描记术。受试者在睡眠研究前的晚上完成了标准的BQ。结果:77例患者平均年龄49.94±15.78岁,其中男性37例(48.1%),白人42例(63.7%)。46例(59.7%)经多导睡眠图诊断为OSA。在对标准BQ各项目的分析中,灵敏度为4.6% ~ 92.5%,特异度为13.3% ~ 85.7%。项目8的敏感性为4.6%,特异性为84.9%,阳性似然比为0.3,阴性似然比为1.1。标准BQ曲线下面积为0.634,删除第8项后曲线下面积为0.751。删除第8项后,将标准BQ上的每一项计算为1点,Yuden指数最高的分界值分别为3.5和4.5。结论:无论标准BQ中阳性类别的数量如何,为每个受试者选择四个不同问题的改进BQ将提高筛查OSA高可能性受试者的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书