Freedom and inequality: On the problem of the history and philosophy of liberalism

Q4 Engineering
V. Rozhkov
{"title":"Freedom and inequality: On the problem of the history and philosophy of liberalism","authors":"V. Rozhkov","doi":"10.18500/1819-7671-2021-21-3-283-287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the study of the problem of the doctrinal identification of freedom and inequality by classical liberalism and neoliberalism. Identifying the features of the naturalistic and theological approaches to the manifestation of inequality in human communities, the author notes the philosophical justification of the legal argumentation of inequality in the theories of natural law and the social contract of modern thinkers. The appeal to the value dynamics reflected in the slogans of the French revolution of the 18th century allows the author to reveal the gradual displacement of the priorities of “Equality” and “Brotherhood”, which were put forward by the revolutionary democracy, by the liberal movements. The final statement of Locke’s version of the orientation of classical liberalism on the triad “Freedom. Property. Life”, according to the author, logically determines the identification of freedom with inequality, and equality with slavery by representatives of liberal circles. The development of the concepts of “social solidarity” by the theorists of neoliberalism, according to the author’s proof, does not change the liberal attitude to “freedom in inequality”. The analysis of the categories of freedom and inequality allows the author to formulate the contradictions of this provision. The article concludes that with the aggravation of the derived contradiction to the maximum, the risk of self-denial of liberalism increases.","PeriodicalId":52312,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya of Saratov University, New Series: Physics","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya of Saratov University, New Series: Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2021-21-3-283-287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of the doctrinal identification of freedom and inequality by classical liberalism and neoliberalism. Identifying the features of the naturalistic and theological approaches to the manifestation of inequality in human communities, the author notes the philosophical justification of the legal argumentation of inequality in the theories of natural law and the social contract of modern thinkers. The appeal to the value dynamics reflected in the slogans of the French revolution of the 18th century allows the author to reveal the gradual displacement of the priorities of “Equality” and “Brotherhood”, which were put forward by the revolutionary democracy, by the liberal movements. The final statement of Locke’s version of the orientation of classical liberalism on the triad “Freedom. Property. Life”, according to the author, logically determines the identification of freedom with inequality, and equality with slavery by representatives of liberal circles. The development of the concepts of “social solidarity” by the theorists of neoliberalism, according to the author’s proof, does not change the liberal attitude to “freedom in inequality”. The analysis of the categories of freedom and inequality allows the author to formulate the contradictions of this provision. The article concludes that with the aggravation of the derived contradiction to the maximum, the risk of self-denial of liberalism increases.
自由与不平等:论自由主义的历史与哲学问题
本文致力于研究古典自由主义和新自由主义对自由和不平等的理论认同问题。作者指出了自然主义和神学方法对人类社会不平等表现的特点,并指出了现代思想家在自然法理论和社会契约理论中对不平等的法律论证的哲学论证。通过对18世纪法国大革命口号中体现的价值动态的诉求,作者揭示了革命民主主义所提出的“平等”和“兄弟情谊”的优先事项逐渐被自由主义运动所取代。最后陈述了洛克版本的古典自由主义取向上的三位一体“自由”。财产。在作者看来,“生活”在逻辑上决定了自由圈的代表把自由等同于不平等,把平等等同于奴役。根据作者的证明,新自由主义理论家对“社会团结”概念的发展并没有改变自由主义者对“不平等中的自由”的态度。通过对自由和不平等范畴的分析,作者可以阐述这一规定的矛盾之处。文章的结论是,随着派生矛盾的最大程度的加剧,自由主义自我否定的风险也随之增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信