Revisiting the determinants of knowledge-sharing behavior in organizations: a meta-analytic structural equation model application

IF 2.1 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, Roziah Mohd Rasdi
{"title":"Revisiting the determinants of knowledge-sharing behavior in organizations: a meta-analytic structural equation model application","authors":"Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh, Roziah Mohd Rasdi","doi":"10.1108/gkmc-02-2022-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe existing literature on knowledge-sharing (KS) behavior in the organizational context demonstrates that there is diversity, if not divergence, in understanding KS. Thus, this paper aims to integrate social cognitive theory and social exchange theory to construct a research model for determining the incentive for knowledge sharing among individuals in organizations based on past empirical results.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAccordingly, the methodology adopted in this study is the meta-analytic structural equation modeling based on the data gathered from 78 studies (80 samples, n = 29,318).\n\n\nFindings\nThe most significant predictors of KSB were organizational support and social interaction ties, whereby KS intention and attitude were most optimally predicted by organizational commitment, knowledge self-efficacy, social interaction ties, organizational expectancy and reciprocal benefit. This study carried out a moderation analysis to look into potential causes of inconsistent results.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis meta-analysis shows the most influencing factors that trigger KSB in organizations. Moreover, this study clarifies the possible reasons for the inconsistent findings of the previous studies. Thus, it contributes to the KS literature.\n","PeriodicalId":43718,"journal":{"name":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Knowledge Memory and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/gkmc-02-2022-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The existing literature on knowledge-sharing (KS) behavior in the organizational context demonstrates that there is diversity, if not divergence, in understanding KS. Thus, this paper aims to integrate social cognitive theory and social exchange theory to construct a research model for determining the incentive for knowledge sharing among individuals in organizations based on past empirical results. Design/methodology/approach Accordingly, the methodology adopted in this study is the meta-analytic structural equation modeling based on the data gathered from 78 studies (80 samples, n = 29,318). Findings The most significant predictors of KSB were organizational support and social interaction ties, whereby KS intention and attitude were most optimally predicted by organizational commitment, knowledge self-efficacy, social interaction ties, organizational expectancy and reciprocal benefit. This study carried out a moderation analysis to look into potential causes of inconsistent results. Originality/value This meta-analysis shows the most influencing factors that trigger KSB in organizations. Moreover, this study clarifies the possible reasons for the inconsistent findings of the previous studies. Thus, it contributes to the KS literature.
重新审视组织中知识共享行为的决定因素:一个元分析结构方程模型的应用
目的现有的关于组织背景下知识共享行为的文献表明,在对知识共享的理解上,即使没有分歧,也存在着多样性。因此,本文旨在结合社会认知理论和社会交换理论,在以往实证结果的基础上,构建组织中个体知识共享激励机制的研究模型。因此,本研究采用的方法是基于78项研究(80个样本,n = 29,318)收集的数据的元分析结构方程模型。结果发现组织支持和社会互动关系对员工工作满意度的预测最显著,其中组织承诺、知识自我效能感、社会互动关系、组织期望和互惠关系对员工工作满意度的预测最优。本研究进行了适度分析,以探讨结果不一致的潜在原因。原创性/价值本荟萃分析显示了组织中触发KSB的最具影响力的因素。此外,本研究澄清了以往研究结果不一致的可能原因。因此,它有助于KS文献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication
Global Knowledge Memory and Communication INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
16.70%
发文量
77
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信